Saturday, December 05, 2009

Tony Blair Funded by Obscure Oligarch

Just when you thought it couldn’t get any seedier… – © Mark

THE TELEGRAPH: Tony Blair’s new paymaster is an obscure oligarch with business links to Syria, Iran and Afghanistan, The Daily Telegraph has learnt.

Nizami Piriyev, left, an Azerbaijan-based millionaire, paid Mr Blair, centre, to fly to Baku. Photograph: The Telegraph

Nizami Piriyev, an Azerbaijan-based millionaire, paid Mr Blair to fly to Baku, the capital, earlier this week to open his new “methanol plant” funded by a British government-backed bank.

The disclosure comes amid growing scrutiny of Mr Blair’s network of private backers, with the Kuwaiti government understood to be one of his biggest financial supporters.

The former prime minister has earned an estimated £14 million since leaving Downing Street in June 2007. He no longer has to disclose the sources of his income.

Westminster watchdogs have raised concerns over the employment of former ministers, including prime ministers, by the private sector after they leave office.

Mr Blair typically charges tens of thousands of pounds simply to give a speech and is therefore thought to have received more than £100,000 for his trip to Azerbaijan.

He made the trip to Baku, his first to the former Soviet bloc country, to open the methanol plant of Azmeco, the Azerbaijan Methanol Company. Mr Blair’s presence as the “special guest” of Mr Piriyev, the company’s chairman, surprised many onlookers. >>> Holly Watt and Robert Winnett | Saturday, December 05, 2009

MAIL ONLINE: Blair, Prince Andrew... and a private meeting in Azerbaijan >>> Ian Gallagher in Baku, Azerbaijan | Saturday, December 05, 2009

Friday, December 04, 2009

Al-Andalus: الأندلس

Winston Churchill: Zürich Speech

COUNCIL OF EUROPE: Mr President, ladies and gentlemen,

I am honoured today by being received in your ancient university and by the address which has been given to me and which I greatly value. I wish to speak to you to-day about the tragedy of Europe, this noble Continent, comprising on the whole the fairest and the most cultivated regions of the earth enjoying a temperate and equable climate, the home of all the great parent races of the western world, the foundation of Christian faith and Christian ethics. 



It is the origin of most of the culture, arts, philosophy, and science both of ancient and modern times. If Europe were once united in the sharing of its common inheritance there would be no limit to the happiness, the prosperity, and the glory which its 300,000,000 or 400,000,000 people would enjoy. 



Yet it is from Europe that have sprung that series of frightful nationalistic quarrels, originated by the Teutonic nations in their rise to power, which we have seen in this twentieth century and even in our own lifetime wreck the peace and mar the prospects of all mankind. 



And what is this plight to which Europe has been reduced? Some of the smaller States have indeed made a good recovery, but over wide areas are a vast quivering mass of tormented, hungry, careworn, and bewildered human beings, who wait at the ruins of their cities and their homes and scan the dark horizons for the approach of some new form of tyranny or terror. 



Among the victors there is a ballet of voices, among the vanquished the sullen silence of despair. That is all that Europeans, grouped in so many ancient states and nations, and that is all that the Germanic races have got by tearing each other to pieces and spreading havoc far and wide. Indeed, but for the fact that the great republic across the Atlantic Ocean at length realised that the ruin or enslavement of Europe would involve her own fate as well, and stretched out hands of succour and guidance; but for that, the Dark Ages would have returned in their cruelty and -squalor. They may still return. 



Yet all the while there is a remedy which, if it were generally and spontaneously adopted by the great majority of people in many lands, would as if by a miracle transform the whole scene and would in a few years make all Europe, or the greater part of it, as free and as happy as Switzerland is to-day. 



What is this sovereign remedy? It is to recreate the European fabric, or as much of it at we can, and to provide it with a structure under which it can dwell in peace, in safety, and in freedom. We must build a kind of United States of Europe. In this way only will hundreds of millions of toilers be able to regain the simple joys and hopes which make life worth living. The process is simple. All that is needed is the resolve of hundreds of millions of men and women to do right instead of wrong and to gain as their reward blessing instead of cursing. 



Much work has been done upon this task by the exertions of the pan-European union which owes so much to and which commanded the services of the famous French patriot and statesman Aristide Briand. There is also that immense body which brought into being amidst high hopes after the first world war - the League of Nations. The league did not fail because of its principles or conceptions. It faded because those principles were deserted by those States which had brought it into being, because the Governments of those States feared to face the facts and act while time remained. This disaster must not be repeated. There is therefore much knowledge and material with which to build, and also bitter, dearly bought experience to spur. 



I was very glad to read in the newspapers a few days ago that my friend President Truman had expressed his interest and sympathy with this great design. 



There is no reason why a regional organisation of Europe Should [sic] in any way conflict with the world organisation of the United Nations. On the contrary, I believe that the larger synthesis can only survive if it is founded upon broad natural groupings. There is already a natural grouping in the western hemisphere. We British have our own commonwealth of nations. These do not weaken, on the contrary they strengthen, the world organisation. They are in fact its main support. 



And why should there not be a European group, which could give a sense of enlarged patriotism and common citizenship to the distracted peoples of this mighty continent? And why should it not take its rightful place with other great groupings and help to shape the honourable destiny of man? 


In order that this may be accomplished there must be an act of faith in which the millions of families, speaking many languages, must consciously take part. 



We all know that the two world wars through which we have passed arose out of the vain passion of the newly united Germany to play a dominating part in the world. In this last struggle crimes and massacres have been committed for which there is no parallel since the invasion of the Mongols during the thirteenth century, no equal at any in human history. The guilty must be punished. Germany must be deprived of the power to rearm and make another aggressive war. 



But when all this has been done, as it will be done. as it is being done then there must be an end to retribution. There must be what Mr Gladstone many years ago, called the ' blessed act of oblivion.' We must all turn our backs upon the horrors of the past and we must look to the future. We cannot afford to must look forward across the years that are to come, hatreds and revenges which have sprung from the injuries of the past. If Europe is to be saved from infinite misery and indeed from final doom, there must be this act of faith in the European family this 'act of oblivion against all crimes and follies of the past. Can these peoples of Europe rise to the heights of the soul and of the instinct and spirit of man? If they could, the wrongs and injuries which have been indicted would have been washed away on all sides by the miseries which have been endured. Is there any need for further floods of agony? Is the only lesson of history to be that mankind is unteachable? Let there be justice, mercy, and freedom. The peoples have only to will it and all will achieve their hearts' desire. 


I am now going to say something that will astonish you. The first step in the recreation of the European family must be a partnership between France and Germany. In this way only can France recover the moral and cultural leadership of Europe. There can be no revival of Europe without a spiritually great France and a spiritually great Germany. 



The structure of the United States of Europe will be such as to make the material strength of a single State less important. Small nations will count as much as large ones and gain their honour by a contribution to the common cause. The ancient states and principalities of Germany, freely joined for mutual convenience in a federal system, might take their individual places among the United States of Europe. 



I shall not try to make a detailed programme. There are hundreds of millions of people who want to be happy and free, prosperous and safe, who wish to enjoy the four freedoms of which the great President Roosevelt spoke, and live in accordance with the principles embodied in the Atlantic Charter. 



If this is their wish, if it is the wish of Europeans from many lands, they have only to say so and means can certainly be found and the machinery erected to carry that wish to full fruition. 



But I must give you warning. Time may be short. At present there is a breathing space. The cannons have ceased firing. The fighting has stopped, but the dangers have not stopped. If we are to form a United States of Europe, or whatever name it may take, we must begin now. 



In these present days we dwell strangely and precariously under the shield, and I will even say protection, of the atomic bomb. The atomic bomb is still only in the hands of a State and nation which we know, will never use it except in the cause of right and freedom, but it may well be that in a few years this awful agency of destruction will be widespread and that the catastrophe following from its use by several warring nations will not only bring to an end all that we call civilisation but may possibly disintegrate the globe itself. 



I must now sum-up the propositions which are before you. 



Our constant aim must be to build and fortify the strength of the United Nations organisation. Under and within that world concept we must recreate the European family in a regional structure called - it may be - the United States of Europe and the first practical step will be to form a Council of Europe. 



If at first all the States of Europe are not willing or able to join a union we must nevertheless proceed to assemble and combine those who will and those who can. 



The salvation of the common people of every race and of every land from war and servitude must be established on solid foundations, and must be created by the readiness of all men and women to die rather than to submit to tyranny. 



In all this urgent work France and Germany must take the lead together. Great Britain, the British Commonwealth of Nations, mighty America, and, I trust. Soviet Russia- - for then, indeed, all would be well - must be the friends and sponsors of the new Europe and must champion its right to live. 



Therefore I say to you: ' Let Europe arise.'

Winston Churchill,
September 19, 1946,
Zürich, Switzerland [Source: Council of Europe]

Die Rede in der deutschen Sprache… >>>

Le discours en français... >>>
Iranian artist Shirin Neshat, third from right, leads actors in expressing support for Iran's opposition movement at the Venice film festival in September. Photograph: The Wall Street Journal

Iranian Crackdown Goes Global

THE WALL STREET JOURNAL: NEW YORK -- His first impulse was to dismiss the ominous email as a prank, says a young Iranian-American named Koosha. It warned the 29-year-old engineering student that his relatives in Tehran would be harmed if he didn't stop criticizing Iran on Facebook.

Two days later, his mom called. Security agents had arrested his father in his home in Tehran and threatened him by saying his son could no longer safely return to Iran.

"When they arrested my father, I realized the email was no joke," said Koosha, who asked that his full name not be used.

Tehran's leadership faces its biggest crisis since it first came to power in 1979, as Iranians at home and abroad attack its legitimacy in the wake of June's allegedly rigged presidential vote. An opposition effort, the "Green Movement," is gaining a global following of regular Iranians who say they never previously considered themselves activists.

The regime has been cracking down hard at home. And now, a Wall Street Journal investigation shows, it is extending that crackdown to Iranians abroad as well.

In recent months, Iran has been conducting a campaign of harassing and intimidating members of its diaspora world-wide -- not just prominent dissidents -- who criticize the regime, according to former Iranian lawmakers and former members of Iran's elite security force, the Revolutionary Guard, with knowledge of the program.

Part of the effort involves tracking the Facebook, Twitter and YouTube activity of Iranians around the world, and identifying them at opposition protests abroad, these people say.

Interviews with roughly 90 ordinary Iranians abroad -- college students, housewives, doctors, lawyers, businesspeople -- in New York, London, Dubai, Sweden, Los Angeles and other places indicate that people who criticize Iran's regime online or in public demonstrations are facing threats intended to silence them. >>> Farnaz Fassihi | Friday, December 04, 2009
Calls for Ban of Separate Jewish and Muslim Cemeteries

EUROPEAN JEWISH PRESS: Days after Swiss voters banned the construction of minarets in the country

GENEVA---The leader of a Swiss political party is calling to ban separate Jewish and Muslim cemeteries, only days after Swiss voters approved a ban on the building of minarets in the country.

It doesn't bother me to be buried next to a person of another religion," Christophe Darbellay, president of the Christian Democratic People's Party (CVP/PDC), declared in an interview with the Swiss daily newspaper Le Matin. >>> Maureen Shamee | Friday, December 04, 2009
Dutch MPs Cancel Turkey Visit Over Wilders Ban

NRC HANDELSBLAD INTERNATIONAL: Dutch members of parliament have cancelled a scheduled visit to Turkey after the Turkish government refused to meet with the delegation if anti-Islam politician Geert Wilders was part of it.

When the matter was put to a vote in Dutch parliament on Wednesday, all parties opted to cancel the visit, which was scheduled for January, even though Turkish members of parliament and local social organisations had said they would meet with the delegation regardless.

"This was a unanimous decision. We deeply regret the fact that this will make an effective dialogue impossible, but if the Turkish government refuses to meet with us, the most essential parts of our schedule will not be able to go ahead," Harm Evert Waalkens, leader of the parliamentary delegation, said on Wednesday. One of the main reasons for the visit was Turkey's accession to the European Union.

A representative of the Turkish ministry of foreign affairs called the Dutch parliament's decision "unilateral."

"We have made our point clear," the spokesperson said. "We have not forbidden Wilders to visit, but we are unwilling to roll out the red carpet for him since the media attention he will garner by coming to Turkey will overshadow all other members of the delegation. But we are not praising God for the fact that he will not be coming. We will evaluate the decision of the Dutch parliament." >>> By Handelsblad’s news staff | Thursday, December 03, 2009
Opinion – Taj Hargey: Minarets Are Not an Essential Part of Islam

TIMES ONLINE: The Swiss vote does not infringe Muslim religious rights

Switzerland’s referendum vote to ban minarets is needlessly xenophobic but it does not infringe the religious liberty of Swiss Muslims. Minarets remain emblematic of mosques in the Muslim heartlands but there is no theological reason why houses of worship in the West have to incorporate such towers.

Their original purpose was to relay the prayer call with the unamplified voice. Today this is done by modern technology, so minarets are not integral to contemporary mosque design. European mosques should stop mindlessly mimicking Eastern design and create prayer halls that blend into the landscape.

Muslims who have settled in Switzerland (and elsewhere in Europe) should not confuse culture with creed. To become integrated into their surroundings, they must relinquish the cultural baggage of their ancestral homelands. They should practice a Swiss Islam that is rooted in the society in which they live.

Although the Swiss have been convinced by right-wing zealots that minarets are a problem, local Muslims should not embrace a victim mentality. They must confront the toxic radicalisation of their faith that is imported from overseas. The Wahhabi denomination >>> Taj Hargey | Tuesday, December 01, 2009

Dr Taj Hargey is the chairman of the Muslim Educational Centre of Oxford and the imam of the Summertown Islamic Congregation in Oxford

Thursday, December 03, 2009

La City redoute une régulation à la "française"

LE MONDE: Michel Barnier se serait bien passé de cette empoignade. Le prochain commissaire au marché intérieur craint de voir son début de mandat empoisonné par l'opposition entre le Royaume-Uni et la France au sujet de la régulation financière. Entre Paris et Londres, le ton est monté de plusieurs crans depuis la nomination du Français par le président de la Commission européenne, José Manuel Barroso, à un poste stratégique en ces temps de crise, puisqu'il chapeaute les services financiers.

Les Britanniques s'inquiètent du sort de la City de Londres, la principale place financière européenne. Ils ont tout fait pour empêcher M. Barroso de nommer à cette fonction une personnalité soucieuse de pousser les feux de la régulation. Ils n'ont ensuite pas apprécié que Nicolas Sarkozy présente leur pays, dans un commentaire accordé au Monde, comme le "grand perdant" de la récente répartition des postes bruxellois. Et jette ensuite de l'huile sur le feu en affirmant que ce sont "les idées françaises de régulation qui triomphent en Europe".

Cette "guéguerre" complique la formation des cabinets des commissaires, à Bruxelles. Déjà flanqué, à la demande du premier ministre britannique, Gordon Brown, d'un directeur général britannique, M.Barnier refuse de recruter un conseiller proche des intérêts de la City. Ce qui déplaît à Londres, lequel a fait pression sur Catherine Ashton, la toute nouvelle haute représentante de l'Union européenne pour la politique étrangère, afin qu'elle renonce à ce st.ade à recruter un Français dans son cabinet. >>> Philippe Ricard et Marc Roche | Jeudi 03 Décembre 2009
Les Français opposés à un référendum sur les minarets et à la construction de mosquées

LE MONDE: Le résultat du référendum suisse sur les minarets n'en finit pas de faire des vagues en France. Et de souligner les contradictions de l'opinion. L'organisation d'un référendum sur l'interdiction de construire des minarets serait une mauvaise chose pour 54 % des Français, indique un sondage BVA pour Canal+, jeudi 3 décembre. Les réponses diffèrent selon la couleur politique des sondés : 61 % des sympathisants de droite approuvent l'idée d'un référendum, contre 31 % parmi les sympathisants de gauche. >>> LeMonde.fr avec AFP | Jeudi 03 Décembre 2009
Weltwoche-Videokommentar von Roger Köppel zum Minarettenverbot



DIE WELTWOCHE: Die Totengräber der Demokratie: Nach dem Ja zur Minarett-Initiative wollen Politiker, Richter und Professoren den Volksentscheid kippen. Sie verbünden sich mit europäischen Eliten zu einer antidemokratischen Allianz. Das Austricksen des Souveräns hat System und Tradition. >>> | Mittwoche, 02. Dezember 2009

DIE WELTWOCHE: Einwanderung: Bern verliert die Kontrolle >>> Von Pierre Heumann | Mittwoch, 02. Dezember 2009
Gay by Nature: Part One

PINK NEWS: What causes homosexuality? Can sexual orientation be changed? And are the brains of gay people different from those of straight people? Adrian Tippetts meets Dr Qazi Rahman, an assistant professor in Cognitive Biology from Queen Mary University London, to find out more.

While almost all scientists accept homosexuality has purely natural causes, the debate has been mired in confusion. There have been conflicting reports about the existence of ‘gay’ genes and their significance. Religious propagandists have tried to promote the myths that sexuality is changeable. And the mainstream media, more interested in causing controversy than holding rational debate, has done little to raise public understanding about the issue. For Dr Rahman, who heads QMUL’s Biological and Experimental Psychology Group, it is quite clear: you’re born gay, and that’s that.

I begin by asking him what aspects of biology are responsible for sexual orientation.

"The whole nature-nurture debate is entirely pointless,” he says. “Sexual orientation is not a choice because humans come in two types: one with a vagina, the other with a penis, so sexual orientation is entirely biological.

"We all end up at the same point: heterosexuality or homosexuality. There is little variation in between but this is not to exclude bisexual behaviour. People do not end up sexually attracted to bananas or animals for example. This is not a flippant comment. What I am saying is that we see the same characteristic traits and behaviours, resulting from a relatively small number of factors. >>> Adrian Tippetts | Tuesday, December 01, 2009

Gay by Nature: Part Two >>> Adrian Tippetts | Wednesday, December 02, 2009

WASHINGTON TIMES: New York Chooses Benightedness Over Enlightenment >>>

Voting for Discrimination

THE NEW YORK TIMES – Editorial: The New York State Senate held an emotional debate on Wednesday in which there was talk of belief and conscience and eloquent reminders of earlier civil rights struggles. It then took a stand against equality and fairness.

By a 38-to-24 vote, lawmakers chose to continue the state’s discrimination against couples who want to get married and simply happen to be the same sex.

Like Gov. David Paterson and advocates who pressed for the vote, we had hoped a sufficient number of senators would do the right thing when required to take a stand. In the end, though, not a single Republican possessed the courage or sense of justice to depart from an obsolete and narrow-minded party line, even the handful who had indicated that they might.

Also succumbing to what Senator Thomas Duane, a Democrat of Manhattan, called “contagious lack of backbone” were eight Democrats: Joseph Addabbo Jr., Darrel Aubertine, Rubén Díaz Sr., Shirley Huntley, Carl Kruger, Hiram Monserrate, George Onorato and William Stachowski.

Mr. Paterson was right to insist on the vote during the current special session, but he was too weak to get the job done. The Democratic Senate leaders — John Sampson of Brooklyn, Pedro Espada Jr. of the Bronx, and Malcolm Smith of Queens — also failed to deliver. >>> NYT | Wednesday, December 02, 2009

Björn Borg: Love for All



Björn Borg: Love for All >>>
Climate Scientist James Hansen Hopes Summit Will Fail

TIMES ONLINE: A leading scientist acclaimed as the grandfather of global warming has denounced the Copenhagen summit on climate change next week as a farce.

James Hansen, the director of Nasa’s Goddard Insitute for Space Studies, told The Times that he planned to boycott the UN conference because it was seeking a counter-productive agreement to limit emissions through a “cap and trade” system.

“They are selling indulgences there. The developed nations want to continue basically business as usual so they are expected to purchase indulgences to give some small amount of money to developing countries. They do that in the form of offsets and adaptation funds.” he said.

Dr Hansen, 68, the fifth of seven children of an Iowa farmer, joined Nasa after taking his PhD to study Venus but changed course when he realised that man-made emissions were choking the atmosphere on his own planet.

He was one of the first voices to raise the alarm about rising global temperatures in the early 1980s, forecasting correctly that the planet would warm in the coming decades. >>> James Bone in New York | Thursday, December 03, 2009
Dancing Cheek to Cheek

Gays and Transsexuals 'Will Never Go to Heaven'*, Cardinal Says

THE TELEGRAPH: The Roman Catholic Church still regards homosexuality as an “insult to God” and homosexuals and transsexuals will never go to Heaven, a leading cardinal said on Wednesday, prompting a rebuke from the Vatican.

"Transsexuals and homosexuals will never enter the Kingdom of Heaven and it is not me who says this, but Saint Paul," said Cardinal Javier Lozano Barragan, 76.

In remarks which outraged gay rights groups, he claimed that people were not born gay, but chose to embrace homosexuality of their own free will.

"People are not born homosexual, they become homosexual, for different reasons: education issues or because they did not develop their own identity during adolescence.

"Perhaps they aren't guilty but by acting against the dignity of the body they will certainly not enter the Kingdom of Heaven," said Cardinal Barragan, who recently retired as head of the Vatican's Council for Pastoral Assistance to Health Care Workers but still holds influential positions on several Church committees.

He quoted a passage from Paul's epistle to the Romans which speaks of "men committing indecent acts with other men".

"Homosexuality is therefore a sin, but this does not justify any form of discrimination. God alone has the right to judge," the cardinal said. "We on earth cannot condemn, and as human beings we all have the same rights."

But the Vatican distanced itself from the cardinal's comments in a statement that was highly unusual because it indirectly criticised a top Church official. >>> Nick Squires in Perugia | Thursday, December 03, 2009

* Who the hell cares? Hell's where all the interesting people are going to end up anyway!

Gay, lesbiche e trans all’inferno!

ARCIGAY: Mentre in tutta Italia imperversano violenze contro le persone omosessuali e campagne mediatiche contro la dignità delle persone transessuali, arrivano le considerazioni del cardinale messicano Javier Lozano Barragan, che sul sito www.pontifex.roma.it si scaglia oggi, prima contro la pillola del giorno dopo (in verità contro la RU486, ma i gerarchi cattolici fanno spesso confusione), e poi naturalmente contro gay e trans che non potranno mai entrare nel Regno dei Cieli.

Il presidente emerito del Pontificio Consiglio per gli operatori sanitari Pastorale per la salute, insiste poi nell’affermare che non si nasce omosessuali, che la causa del proprio orientamento sessuale la si deve cercare nell’educazione, in un mancato sviluppo dell’adolescenza. Si può anche esser incolpevoli, ma siccome gay e trans agiscono contro la dignità del corpo, certamente non andranno in paradiso, perché andare contro natura offende Dio. >>> Aurelio Mancuso, presidente nazionale Arcigay | Giovedi 03 dicembre 2009

Tariq Ramadan implore de ne pas bannir la burqa

LE TEMPS: Rudement pris à partie par des députés français, l’intellectuel suisse Tariq Ramadan s’est défendu lors d’une audition à Paris

Tariq Ramadan a imploré mercredi les députés français de ne pas interdire le port de la burqa, estimant qu’une telle mesure pousserait les musulmans à s’isoler encore plus, au moment où l’interdiction de la construction des minarets en Suisse semble aggraver le fossé entre islam et Occident.

«En ce qui me concerne, je pense que la burqa et le niqâb [sa version saoudienne] ne sont pas des prescriptions islamiques», alors que le simple foulard «en est une», a déclaré l’intellectuel suisse devant la mission parlementaire d’information sur le port du voile intégral.

Mais «une loi qui serait simplement perçue comme stigmatisante ne résoudrait pas le problème». D’autant que pour les femmes qui ont adopté le voile intégral, «l’autorité de ce qui se dit ici n’a absolument pas de poids par rapport à ce qui se dit là-bas» – c’est-à-dire en Arabie saoudite, d’où prêchent, par Internet, la plupart des religieux qui considèrent la burqa comme une obligation. Selon le Ministère français de l’intérieur, le port du voile intégral ne concerne que quelques centaines de personnes en France, mais le phénomène est en progression. >>> Sylvain Besson | Jeudi 03 Décembre 2009
Dhimmitude! Minarets : l'Europe doit changer son regard sur l'islam

LE FIGARO: TRIBUNE - Pour le grand rabbin de France Gilles Bernheim, la décision des Suisses d'interdire les minarets pose aussi la question de la place de la religion dans la société occidentale.

Toute décision qui aboutit à donner moins de droits aux fidèles d'une religion qu'aux fidèles d'une autre religion est une décision injuste. Ceci vaut en Suisse comme dans le reste du monde. Je suis contre l'interdiction de construire des minarets, qui a été votée en Suisse.

Quand on affirme un tel principe, il est nécessaire d'en poser le cadre. Loin de moi l'idée d'une surenchère de revendications particulières prenant pour seul argument le fait que la religion d'en face a plus ou mieux. Mon cadre est celui de la République, de la laïcité et de la Déclaration universelle des droits de l'homme qui prévoit, dans le même article, «la liberté de pensée, de conscience et de religion».

Chaque pays a une histoire religieuse. Vouloir balayer cet héritage serait un non-sens. En France, il y aura toujours davantage d'églises que de mosquées, synagogues et pagodes réunies. Ce qui est problématique dans la question posée aux Suisses, c'est la discrimination qu'elle instaure en autorisant la construction de clochers et de hauts édifices par les autres religions que l'islam. Jadis il est arrivé qu'on interdise aux juifs de construire des synagogues plus hautes que l'église : c'était défendre le principe d'une religion dominante, ce n'était pas déclarer l'autre religion indésirable.

Aujourd'hui, certains s'interrogent sur la conformité de la question posée avec des engagements internationaux signés par la Suisse. Mais si la question est viciée, alors pourquoi l'avoir posée ? La démocratie est-elle si mal en point que son paroxysme - l'initiative ou référendum populaire - puisse ainsi se tourner contre elle, sans quelqu'un pour bloquer la mécanique infernale ? L'affaire des minarets suisses a commencé en 2006, l'initiative populaire a été lancée en mai 2007 et les 100 000 signatures requises ont été déposées en juillet 2008. >>> Gilles Bernheim, grand rabbin de France | Mercredi 02 Décembre 2009
Schweizer in Libyen haben Angst: Neuer Prozess – Ungewisse Hoffnung auf Hilfe von Seif al-Islam Ghadhafi

NZZ ONLINE: Die Lage der beiden in Libyen verurteilten Schweizer ist prekär. Mitte Dezember wird ihnen in Tripolis ein weiterer Prozess gemacht. Man hofft, dass Seif al-Islam Ghadhafi, Sohn des libyschen Führers, sich für ihre Freilassung verwendet.

In der libyschen Presse ist die Verurteilung der beiden in Tripolis festgehaltenen Schweizer nur kurz erwähnt worden. Die im Ausland ansässige unabhängige libysche Presse repetierte, was die Schweizer Medien verbreitet hatten.

Ein libyscher Anwalt behauptet am Telefon, die beiden Schweizer hätten grosse Angst vor der «Gefängnisstrafe ohne Bewährung», zu der sie am Dienstag verurteilt worden seien. Ausserdem fürchteten sie sich vor dem zweiten Prozess, der für Mitte Dezember angekündigt worden ist. Dabei sollen Max Göldi und Rachid Hamdani der illegalen wirtschaftlichen Tätigkeit in Libyen angeklagt werden. Das bestätigten libysche Regierungsbeamte. >>> Kristina Bergmann, Kairo | Mittwoch, 02. Dezember 2009

Wednesday, December 02, 2009

’Tis the Season!

For the first time since 1990, Delia returns to television screens at Christmas time to unveil a celebration feast packed with indulgent, scrumptious recipes.

Delia is a firm believer that the festive period of cooking and feasting should be cherished, not feared. In a season which can be fraught with panic, Delia is here to allay cooks' worries. She steers through the minefield of timings and planning in the hectic weeks before Christmas Day; the key, of course, being to prepare as much as possible in advance.

Delia treats viewers with Christmas classics, from gloriously fragrant home-made mincemeat and traditional Christmas pudding to a glossily bronzed turkey with all the trimmings. She spoils the hungry with a delicious chocolate and sour cherry crumble, her best cranberry and orange relish, and delectable scallops in the shell. Diners will ascend to culinary heaven with her fillet of beef with wild mushroom and red wine sauce, and roasted bacon with blackened crackling, and there's a twinkly delight as Delia indulges dessert lovers with a gorgeous panettone trifle.

Delia's Classic Christmas is a sumptuous celebration of Christmas cooking crammed with Delia's best Christmas recipes, practical tips and step-by-step guides to enjoying the preparations. |Source: BBC]

Watch* Delia’s Classic Christmas >>> | Tuesday, December 01, 2009

Duration: 60 minutes

*Unfortunately, it will be possible to watch this BBC cookery programme only if you are in the United Kingdom.
Addicted to Bonuses: The Fat Slobs at RBS Just Can’t Get Enough

Bonus showdown: Stephen Hester, Chief Executive of Royal Bank of Scotland. Photo: Mail Online

MAIL ONLINE: Royal Bank of Scotland directors were accused of holding taxpayers to ransom last night over plans to pay huge bonuses.

The board has threatened to resign en masse if the Treasury blocks the payments.

The row is over an estimated £1.5billion bonus pool for staff at the investment arm of the bank, which is largely owned by the public.

The pool is around 50 per cent bigger than last year and would give 20,000 bankers the equivalent of three times the national average salary each.

The Treasury has demanded a veto, following the taxpayers' £45billion bailout of the Edinburgh institution, but board members say their lawyers tell them they would have to resign if they lost the power to set pay levels.

It is an astonishing challenge to the Government, whose stake in the bank is set to rise to 84 per cent in the coming weeks.

Liberal Democrat spokesman Vince Cable said: 'I would welcome their resignations as they cannot hold the taxpayer to ransom. It's absolutely right that the government should impose bonus discipline on this bank.'

'As a state-run bank, the Government must finally take control and ensure that both its pay and lending practices are in the public interest.' Held to ransom by the bankers: Bosses at RBS (Yes, YOU own it) threaten to quit if they can't dole out huge bonuses >>> Simon Duke | Wednesday, December 02, 2009

THE TELEGRAPH: Lord Myners: 5,000 bankers earn more than £1m: At least 5,000 bankers will earn more than £1 million this year, according to the Government's City minister Lord Myners. >>> Harry Wallop, Consumer Affairs Editor | Wednesday, December 02, 2009
Labour Has Given Up Governing and Now Just Wants a Class War

THE TELEGRAPH: Gordon Brown is picking a fight with the Tories that will damage Britain, says Benedict Brogan.

So the general election is to be fought on the playing fields of Eton, which I suppose makes a nice change from the West Midlands marginals. No wonder Gordon Brown sounded so perky yesterday. He spoke like a man set free. In a fight to the death, there is no longer any point pretending to govern in the national interest. As it was in the beginning for Labour, so shall it be in the end: class war, plain and simple. Soak the rich, crow about it, and damn the consequences.

That enclave of privilege and educational excellence featured prominently at Prime Minister's Questions. Mr Brown spat out the name with the venom he reserves for those he despises most – namely Tories, those educated privately, and the English middle classes. "Is it public services for the many or inheritance tax cuts for the few? Your tax policy seems to have been dreamed up on the playing fields of Eton," Mr Brown taunted David Cameron, quoting no doubt from Labour's campaign battle plan. On the benches behind him, it was open season on the toffs in tails.

The brazenness with which Mr Brown reduced the election ahead to a battle between the rich and the rest has one advantage at least: it exposed the fraudulence of his claim to govern for all the people, or whatever the phrase was that he used when he first took over in 2007. He governs for himself and his party, first and always.

And, like the Russians retreating before Napoleon, Mr Brown pursues a scorched earth strategy. Its purpose is two-fold: to put the Tories on the spot as an Opposition by driving them towards difficult policy choices that can then be demolished, while doing everything to ensure that if they do get in, they will find the wells have been filled and the fields ploughed with salt. >>> Benedict Brogan | Wednesday, December 02, 2009