Wednesday, April 21, 2010

Met Allows Islamic Protesters to Throw Shoes

Photobucket
Protesters throw shoes at a placard of Barack Obama in Jakarta, Indonesia. Photo: Times Online

TIMES ONLINE: SCOTLAND YARD has bowed to Islamic sensitivities and accepted that Muslims are entitled to throw shoes in ritual protest — which could have the unintended consequence of politicians or the police being hit.

News of the concession by the Metropolitan police has come to light amid a series of trials of more than 70 mostly Muslim demonstrators who were charged with violent disorder after last year’s Gaza protests outside the Israeli embassy in London.

Aquib Salim, 21, an IT student at Queen Mary, London University, who was involved in a shoe-throwing incident, is almost certain to avoid a prison sentence as a result.

Chris Holt, Salim’s solicitor, said he was likely to get a suspended sentence after he pleaded guilty to a single charge of throwing a stick at police lines.

“The court accepted that the earlier shoe-throwing incident was simply a ritual form of protest and therefore not a criminal act of violence,” Holt said.

Judge Denniss agreed that the act of shoe-throwing should not be considered in a charge of violent disorder against the student because it was “a symbolic” political gesture.

Shoes, and particularly the soles of shoes, are regarded as ritually unclean in the Islamic world. An Iraqi journalist became a folk hero for throwing a shoe at President George W Bush during a press conference in December 2008. >>> David Leppard | Sunday, April 11, 2010

HT: Robert Spencer of Jihad Watch: here and here
Dubai Briton Drops Appeal and Goes to Jail for a Month Over a Kiss

MAIL ONLINE: A British woman convicted of indecency for kissing a man in Dubai gave up the battle to prove her innocence yesterday and went to jail.

Estate agent Charlotte Adams believes she will get back to Britain quicker if she serves her one-month sentence.

The 26-year-old tourist, who has been stuck in the Arab state for five months, waived her right to a final appeal and was sent to Dubai Central Prison.

She was allegedly seen passionately kissing Ayman Najafi in a diner at the Jumeirah Beach Residence.

They were each given one-month prison sentences last month for breaching strict public decency laws.

The pair, both from North London, lost an appeal last month against their convictions.

At the time Miss Adams said: 'I want to go to jail straight away. I can't get on with my life at the moment. I'm stuck in this country with no money and I can't work.' >>> Daily Mail Reporter | Wednesday, April 21, 2010
General Election 2010: Nick Clegg Says 'Desperate' Gordon Brown Cannot Be Trusted

THE TELEGRAPH: Nick Clegg has delivered his most outspoken attack on Gordon Brown, calling him “a desperate politician” as he signalled that he would find it difficult to do a deal with the Prime Minister in a hung parliament.

Photobucket
Nick Clegg said that Labour had failed to deliver in its 13 years in charge and could not be trusted now. Photograph: The Telegraph

Labour has become increasingly keen to ally itself with the Liberal Democrats as its chances of victory fade.

But in his first newspaper interview since his party’s shock rise in the opinion polls, Mr Clegg told The Daily Telegraph that Labour had failed to deliver in its 13 years in charge and could not be trusted now.

He said: “Brown systematically blocked, and personally blocked, political reform. I think he is a desperate politician and I just do not believe him.” He added: “And do I think Labour delivered fairness? No. Do I think the Labour Party in its heart has a faith in civil liberties? No. Do I think they’ve delivered political reform? No. They are clutching at straws.”

The highly personal attack on Mr Brown’s integrity will lead to further speculation that the price for any deal with Labour would be that it ditches Mr Brown as leader. >>> Andrew Porter, Political Editor | Tuesday, April 21, 2010

Generals Add Their Fire to Clegg’s Attack on Trident

TIMES ONLINE: Britain should be prepared to scrap its nuclear deterrent, a group of generals write in The Times today, pushing the future of Trident to the forefront of the election.

The generals say that the next government would threaten both frontline Forces and global disarmament talks unless it considers different ways of spending the £80 billion required to replace the fleet of submarines.

Their intervention, although nonpolitical, offers timely support for Nick Clegg, who goes into tomorrow night’s foreign affairs debate with Gordon Brown and David Cameron as the only party leader arguing against a like-for-like replacement. >>> Deborah Haynes and Roland Watson | Wednesday, April 21, 2010

TIMES ONLINE: Money spent on Trident can’t go on troops: Four former senior military commanders ask if our nuclear deterrent is value for money >>> Edwin Bramall, David Ramsbotham, Hugh Beach, Patrick Cordingley | Wednesday, April 21, 2010

Nile Gardiner: Nick Clegg’s Israel-bashing Is Sickening

THE TELEGRAPH – BLOG: With Thursday night’s foreign policy debate looming, it’s important to take a look at Nick Clegg’s willingness to vilify Israel, and his inclination towards bashing the Israelis over the head. I’ve written about Clegg’s distinctly anti-American views and his complete disregard for the NATO alliance, but his policies towards Israel deserve attention as well.

Israel is a close ally of both Great Britain and the United States, the only full democracy in the Middle East along with Iraq, and is under constant fire from Iranian and Syrian-backed terrorist groups such as Hamas and Hizbollah. Its very existence is threatened by the rise of a nuclear-armed Iran, which has malevolently warned of another Holocaust. Yet, the leader of the Liberal Democrats still thinks it’s necessary to demonise Israel, one of our only friends in the region. He’s doing everything but directly call Gaza an Israeli-administered concentration camp.

In his statements, Clegg has drawn a dangerous and false parallel between the Israelis and Islamist terrorist groups. For example he wrote a piece for The Guardian in January 2009 entitled “We Must Stop Arming Israel” condemning Israel’s response to Hamas attacks, and in effect calling for the EU to isolate and even sanction Israel:
Brown must stop sitting on his hands. He must condemn unambiguously Israel’s tactics, just as he has rightly condemned Hamas’s rocket attacks. Then he must lead the EU into using its economic and diplomatic leverage in the region to broker peace. The EU is by far Israel’s biggest export market, and by far the biggest donor to the Palestinians. It must immediately suspend the proposed new cooperation agreement with Israel until things change in Gaza, and apply tough conditions on any long-term assistance to the Palestinian community.
Read on and comment >>> Nile Gardiner | Wednesday, April 21, 2010

Tuesday, April 20, 2010

Too Fat to Fight

TAGES ANZEIGER: Jeder vierte Jugendliche in den USA hat Übergewicht. Für die US-Armee ist dieser Trend eine Gefahr für die nationale Sicherheit.

Photobucket
Untauglich für die Armee: Eine übergewichtige Familie in New York. Bild: Tages Anzeiger

Amerikas Jugend ist mittlerweile so dick, dass sich selbst das US-Militär Sorgen macht. Der Bericht einer Gruppe von pensionierten Armeeangehörigen bezeichnet die Fettleibigkeit als eine Gefahr für die nationale Sicherheit. 27 Prozent der US-Bürger zwischen 17 und 24 Jahren können der Armee nicht beitreten, weil sie übergewichtig sind. Das sind 9 Millionen Männer und Frauen. Jedes Jahr ist das Militär gezwungen, 1200 Rekruten wegen Gewichtsproblemen zu entlassen. «Too fat to fight», «Zu fett, um zu kämpfen» ist das Verdikt und der Titel des Berichts.

«Wenn so viele junge Erwachsene wegen ihres Gewichts nicht kämpfen können, betrifft dies unsere nationale Sicherheit und Bereitschaft», sagt der pensionierte General Jamie Barnett gegenüber der «USA Today». Er ist Teil des Nonprofitunternehmens «Mission: Readiness, Military Leaders for Kids», das aus 130 zurückgetretenen Generälen, Admirälen und anderen Militärkadern besteht. Kalorienreiche Schulkantinen >>> jak | Dienstag, 20. April 2010
'Civil Rights Godmother' Dorothy Height Dies

THE TELEGRAPH: Dorothy Height, "the godmother of the civil rights movement", has died aged 98.

Photobucket
Dorothy Height became president of the National Council of Negro Women in 1957 and held the post for 40 years. Photograph: The Telegraph

Miss Height, the leading female voice of the 1960s US civil rights movement and a participant in historic marches with Martin Luther King Jr and others, died on Tuesday of natural causes.

She led the National Council of Negro Women for 40 years. She continued actively speaking out into her 90s but had been at Howard University Hospital for some time. President Barack Obama called her "the godmother of the civil rights movement" and a hero to many Americans. Mr Obama said in a statement that Height was the only woman at the highest level of the civil rights movement and witnessed "every march and milestone along the way." >>> | Tuesday, April 20, 2010
General Election 2010: David Cameron's Image-makers Created the Vacuum That Nick Clegg Has Filled

THE TELEGRAPH: The Tories are suffering because they don’t have enough solid policies, argues Simon Heffer .

Photobucket
Photo: The Telegraph

The appointment of Nick Clegg as the nation’s favourite son-in-law is more easily explained than many would have us believe. The British public engages with politics only every four or five years. Until a week ago many did not know who Mr Clegg was. Indeed, a considerable number probably still do not. Then he appeared on television (the principal medium of engagement) with equal status to the Prime Minister and the Leader of Her Majesty’s Loyal Opposition, yet with the incalculable bonus of being neither. The usually uninterested public, in this rare moment of engagement, did what it often does at such times, and became impressed by the last charlatan to come along.

The post of novelty charlatan was previously held by Mr Cameron. He established his claim to it when he sought the leadership of his party in 2005, with a performance of equivalent meretriciousness and vacuousness to that executed by Mr Clegg. He now knows how David Davis felt: elbowed aside by somebody more glamorous, more novel, more manipulative, less contaminated by the past. We must doubt that the Liberal Democrats will win the general election, or that Mr Clegg will be prime minister, but the change effected by the unprecedented television debate will have elements of permanence.

Despite being in third place in the polls, Labour is loving this. If the shift to the Lib Dems is remotely reflected at the ballot box, Labour will suffer badly; but the suffering of the Conservative Party, which we were told was going to win the election, is of a different order. There is rage (and I use that word with care) not just that Mr Cameron and his teenage advisers agreed to give Mr Clegg such a platform as these three debates offer; there is rage, albeit hypocritical and belated, that the entire strategy pursued by the Cameron regime over the past four and a half years has left the party so pathetically incapable of defending itself against this mountebank and his frequently preposterous party. For the strategy has left the Conservative Party – and Mr Cameron in particular, as was clear in the first televised debate – without much in the way of conviction to use to counter the Clegg soufflé, and apparently believing in nothing. >>> Simon Heffer | Tuesday, April 20, 2010
UK Investigates Goldman as Bankers Net $5.5bn

TIMES ONLINE: Goldman Sachs has announced it will pay its bankers a share of $5.5 billion (£3.5 billion) for three months work just hours after the Financial Services Authority launched a formal investigation into the US bank.

Staff will receive average compensation of $166,000 each for the first quarter of 2010 after the bank beat expectations with a $3.5 billion net profit.

Goldman Sachs has seen $10 billion wiped from its market value since the Securities and Exchange Commission launched a $1 billion lawsuit against the bank, alleging the bank and one of its vice presidents, Fabrice Tourre, committed securities fraud.

Today, Britain’s FSA said that it has decided to start a “formal enforcement investigation” into Goldman Sachs International, its London-based business, after an initial review of the US case.

The bankers’ payouts beat the start of last year, when average remuneration for the first quarter was $149,000. However, this quarter’s pay is still considerably below the $226,000 allocated to each worker in the first quarter of bank’s record year of 2007.

The amount Goldman put aside for pay this quarter is equivalent to 43 per cent of its $12.8 billion net revenue, the lowest first-quarter compensation ratio in the bank’s history.

In a statement today, Goldman’s chairman and chief executive Lloyd Blankfein alluded to the scandal surrounding the bank. Even before Friday’s shock charges, Goldman had already been criticised for accepting a $10 billion state bailout then paying out billions of dollars in bonuses to its employees.

Mr Blankfein said: “In light of recent events involving the firm, we appreciate the support of our clients and shareholders and the dedication and commitment of our people”. >>> Christine Seib | Tuesday, April 20, 2010
”They Promised Us Cash, But They’ve Given Us Ash!”*

THE TELEGRAPH: The ban on flights over most of Britain caused by a cloud of volcanic ash drifting from Iceland has been extended until tomorrow morning as Boris Johnson, the Mayor of London, expressed fear the restrictions could be "indefinite".

Photobucket
Lighting could be seen amid the erupting lava and ash. Photo: The Telegraph

Mr Johnson questioned the Government's handling of the volcanic ash cloud crisis and said the public needed to know the risks of flying against the reality of the country being without air travel.

He said experts within the aviation industry had told him they were used to operating in countries with volcanos and understood the risks, implying they did not agree with the current flight ban.

But Mr Johnson said if it was "genuinely impossible" to fly, then plans had to be made for the long-term, as the economy of the nation was being affected.

He said: "My anxiety clearly, given the damage that this is going to do to the UK economy, is that this no-fly zone, this closure of the airspace over the country, could just go on for an indefinite period of time at this level of risk to aviation." Iceland volcano: Boris Johnson voices fears of 'indefinite' flight ban >>> Lucy Cockcroft and Gordon Rayner | Tuesday, April 20, 2010

*Source unknown
Atomstreit: Iran weist russische Piloten aus

ZEIT ONLINE: Russland war lange Zeit ein Fürsprecher Teherans, doch inzwischen will auch Moskau UN-Sanktionen gegen Iran mittragen. Teheran reagiert verunsichert.

Photobucket
Irans Präsident Mahmud Ahmadineschad hat angewiesen, dass alle russischen Piloten innerhalb von zwei Monaten Iran verlassen müssen. Bild: Zeit Online

Die iranische Regierung hat alle russischen Piloten, die in der Islamischen Republik arbeiten, aufgefordert das Land innerhalb von zwei Monaten zu verlassen. Es gäbe genügend iranische Piloten, die die Aufgabe übernehmen könnten, so der iranische Transportminister. In der Vergangenheit gab es zwar Probleme und Abstürze bei Flugzeugen mit russischen Piloten, doch der Vorgang geht weit darüber hinaus: Iran sieht sich von seinem Partner Russland international im Stich gelassen.

"Die Iraner brauchen Russlands Unterstützung. Das Ausweisen der Piloten zeugt von einer deutlichen Verunsicherung in Teheran", sagt Walter Posch, Iran-Experte bei der Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik in Berlin. Die beiden Länder pflegen seit langer Zeit gute wirtschaftliche und politische Beziehungen. Im August soll das erste von Russland gebaute Atomkraftwerk in Iran in Betrieb genommen werden. Gleichzeitig schützte Russland Iran mit seinem Veto im UN-Sicherheitsrat zuverlässig vor Sanktionen. Doch damit soll jetzt Schluss sein, wie Russlands Präsident Dimitrij Medwedjew auf dem Nukleargipfel in Washington bekannt gab. >>> Von Raphael Thelen | Montag, 19. April 2010
NATO Calls on Russia to Help Build Missile Defense Shield





RUSSIA TODAY: NATO calls on Russia to help build missile defense shield: Speaking at a news conference in Brussels, Secretary General of NATO Andres Fogh Rasmussen said the alliance should bring Russia onboard as it plans to build a missile defense “roof” in Europe. >>> | Published April 19, 2010; Edited Apiril 20, 2010
Bakijew findet in Weissrussland Exil: Lukaschenko gewährt gestürztem kirgisischem Präsidenten Zuflucht

NZZ ONLINE: Der gestürzte kirgisische Präsident Bakijew hat in der weissrussischen Hauptstadt Minsk sein Exil gefunden. Das teilte der autoritäre Präsident Alexander Lukaschenko mit. «Er kann hier bleiben und leben, und es gibt Arbeit für ihn», sagte Lukaschenko.

Der gestürzte kirgisische Präsident Kurmanbek Bakijew hat in Weissrussland Zuflucht gefunden. Wie der weissrussische Präsident Alexander Lukaschenko am Dienstag mitteilte, traf Bakijew aus Kasachstan kommende in Minsk ein. >>> ddp | Dienstag, 20. April 2010
US Summons Syrian Diplomat Over Hizbollah 'Arms Transfer'

THE TELEGRAPH: The United States has summoned the senior Syrian diplomat in Washington to address "provocative behaviour" regarding the potential transfer of Scud missiles to Hizbollah that it said could be a threat to both Lebanon and Israel.

Photobucket
Lebanese Hezbollah student supporters carry a mock rocket during a protest held by a Hezbollah-run school. Photograph: The Telegraph

"The United States condemns in the strongest terms the transfer of any arms, and especially ballistic missile systems such as the Scud, from Syria to Hizbollah," the statement, issued by State Department spokesman Gordon Duguid, said.

"The transfer of these arms can only have a destabilising effect on the region, and would pose an immediate threat to both the security of Israel and the sovereignty of Lebanon."

The US statement stopped short of confirming the alleged transfer of long-range Scud missiles to Lebanese Hizbollah guerrillas, which if true could cast doubt on US President Barack Obama's diplomatic outreach to Syria.

The State Department said this was the fourth time in recent months that Washington had raised the issue with the Syrian Embassy.

US officials said last week they believed Syria intended to transfer the weaponry, but had doubts about whether the missiles were delivered fully assembled or had actually been transferred to Lebanon.

Damascus has denied the transfer and said Israel might be using the accusation as a pretext for a military strike against Syrian targets. >>> | Tuesday, April 20, 2010
Leo McKinstry: The Lib Dems’ Stance on Immigrants Us Their Most Dishonest (and Dangerous) Policy Yet

MAIL ONLINE: The Lib Dems' surge continues to gather momentum, transforming the nature of British politics. For the first time in more than a century, they are the front-runners in an election campaign, something that would have been unthinkable before Nick Clegg's assured performance in last week's historic TV debate.

A key part of their growing appeal is their claim to be the party of moderation and honesty. That was certainly the tone that Nick Clegg adopted on Thursday night, posing as the honest man of reason who could be trusted to hold the centre ground and be straight with the British public.

Yet, on perhaps the most important issue that British society faces, the Lib Dems are anything but moderate, reasonable or straight. On the question of immigration, the chief concern of many voters after more than a decade of Labour's disastrous open-door policy, Clegg and his party are ideological extremists. >>> Leo McKinstry | Tuesday, April 20, 2010
Bill Discriminates Against Muslims: Protesters

CBC NEWS: About 60 women, a third donning the Muslim veil, demonstrated Saturday in front of Montreal City Hall and demanded the province scrap legislation that would require anyone receiving public services to show their face.

Bill 94 was proposed last month amid Quebec's public debate over how far governments should go to accommodate religious customs.

Government officials have said the bill is a solution to the need to balance individual freedoms with the values of Quebec society, including the equality between men and women and secular public institutions.

But protesters described the legislation as being discriminatory. >>> CBC News | Sunday, April 18, 2010
Behind the Veil: An Intimate Journey Into the Lives of Kandahar’s Women

Islamic Banking & Finance: Shariah Investments

Royaume-Uni : Séisme britannique en vue?

Photobucket
Nick Clegg, leader des «lib-dems», peut compter sur des partisans très actifs. Mais il pourrait être confronté à un vif débat idéologique au sein même de son parti, notamment au niveau des finances publiques. Photo : Le Temps

LE TEMPS: Depuis la bonne prestation, lors du premier débat télévisé, de son leader Nick Clegg que certains comparent déjà à Barack Obama, le troisième parti britannique brouille les cartes électorales

C’est un véritable tremblement de terre électoral qui est en train de se produire en Grande-Bretagne. Le traditionnel Petit Poucet de la politique britannique, le Parti libéral-démocrate, connaît un bond phénoménal dans les sondages. Deux d’entre eux le mettent même en tête (autour de 33%), devant les conservateurs (32%), reléguant les travaillistes en troisième position (26%).

Cet incroyable rebondissement s’est joué en tout juste 90 minutes. Jeudi soir, lors du premier débat télévisé électoral de l’histoire britannique, Nick Clegg, le leader des «lib-dems», a pris tout le monde par surprise. Inconnu d’une bonne partie des 10 millions de téléspectateurs, il a fait souffler un vent frais sur l’échiquier politique du Royaume-Uni, face au premier ministre travailliste Gordon Brown et au leader conservateur David Cameron. Son argument clé? Renvoyer les deux vieux partis dos à dos, promettant «un vrai changement». Très implantés localement >>> Eric Albert | Lundi 19 Avril 2010
La Turquie prête à servir d'"intermédiaire" avec l'Iran

LE MONDE: La Turquie est "prête à agir comme intermédiaire" pour aider au règlement de la question nucléaire iranienne, a déclaré mardi le ministre des affaires étrangères turc, Ahmet Davutoglu, lors d'une conférence de presse à Téhéran. "La Turquie est prête à servir d'intermédiaire pour un échange d'uranium" entre l'Iran et les grandes puissances "et nous espérons avoir un rôle utile dans ce dossier", a déclaré M. Davutoglu à l'issue d'une rencontre avec son homologue iranien Manouchehr Mottaki.

Le chef de la diplomatie turque a par ailleurs réaffirmé que pour Ankara "la solution [de la question nucléaire iranienne] passe par la négociation et par le processus diplomatique" plutôt que par des sanctions, envisagées par les grandes puissances. ”Manque de confiance” >>> LeMonde.fr avec AFP | Mardi 20 Avril 2010
Türkei: Erdoğan will seine Herrschaft ausbauen

DIE PRESSE: Der derzeitige Premier strebt ein Präsidialsystem nach amerikanischem Muster an. Nach der für 2011 geplanten Parlamentswahl, so verkündete Erdoğan, wolle er eine neue Verfassung zum Referendum vorlegen.

ISTANBUL. Der türkische Ministerpräsident Recep Tayyip Erdoğan macht ernst. Er will in der Türkei ein Präsidialsystem einführen. Schon in der Vergangenheit hatte er immer wieder mit diesem Gedanken gespielt. Doch niemals war er damit so konkret wie in den zwei Fernsehinterviews, die er am Wochenende gab.

Nach der für 2011 geplanten Parlamentswahl, so verkündete Erdoğan, wolle er eine neue Verfassung zum Referendum vorlegen, die auf einem Präsidialsystem nach amerikanischem, vielleicht auch französischem Muster beruhen soll. Laut Erdoğan soll danach die Rolle des Parlamentes gestärkt werden.

Verglichen mit dem amerikanischen System hat das türkische Parlament tatsächlich weniger Einfluss. Denn der Präsident kann seine Entscheidungen ganz unabhängig vom Parlament treffen. Niemand zweifelt im mindesten daran, dass Erdoğan selbst vor hat, die Rolle des neuen Präsidenten zu spielen. >>> Jan Keetman | Montag, 19. April, 2010
Obama on Israel's Independence Day: Our Ties Will Only Strengthen

HAARETZ: The relationship between Israel and the U.S. "will only be strengthened in the months and years to come," U.S. President Barack Obama said in a special statement for Israel's 62nd Independence Day.

"Minutes after David Ben-Gurion declared Israel's independence, realizing the dream of a state for the Jewish people in their historic homeland, the United States became the first country to recognize Israel," Obama said.

"To this day, we continue to share a strong, unbreakable bond of friendship between our two nations, anchored by the United States' enduring commitment to Israel's security," Obama continued.

Obama also said his administration would continue to work toward a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

"I look forward to continuing our efforts with Israel to achieve comprehensive peace and security in the region, including a two-state solution, and to working together to counter the forces that threaten Israel, the United States, and the world," he said.

"On this day, we once again honor the extraordinary achievements of the people of Israel, and their deep and abiding friendship with the American people. I offer my best wishes to President Peres, Prime Minister Netanyahu and the people of Israel as they celebrate this happy occasion." >>> Natasha Mozgovaya | Tuesday, April 20, 2010

Watch video of Hillary Clinton’s message to Israel here

Memo from Jerusalem: Mood Is Dark as Israel Marks 62nd Year as a Nation

THE NEW YORK TIMES: JERUSALEM — Every year, Israelis approach the joy of their Independence Day right after immersing themselves in a 24-hour period of grief for fallen soldiers. Before the fireworks burst across the skies Monday night to celebrate the country’s 62nd birthday, the airwaves filled with anguished stories of servicemen and -women killed, the Kaddish prayer of mourning and speeches placing the deeply personal losses of a small country into the sweep of Jewish history.

So there is nothing new or unusual about Israelis’ marking their collective accomplishments with sorrow and concern. It happens all the time, especially among those on the political left who are angry that Israel’s occupation of the Palestinians shows no sign of ending.

But there is something about the mood this year that feels darker than usual. It has a bipartisan quality to it. Both left and right are troubled, and both largely about the same things, especially the Iranian nuclear program combined with growing tensions with the Obama administration.

“There is a confluence of two very worrying events,” said Michael Freund, a rightist columnist for The Jerusalem Post in a telephone interview. “One is the Iranian threat, an existential threat. Add to that the fact that for the first time in recent memory there is a president in the White House who is not overly sensitive to the Jewish state and its interests. You put the two together and it will affect anyone’s mood, even an optimist like me.”

Haaretz, the newspaper that serves as the voice of the shrinking political left in this country, is in a truly depressed mood. Its editorial on Monday contended that Israel “is isolated globally and embroiled in a conflict with the superpower whose friendship and support are vital to its very existence.” >>> Ethan Bronner | Monday, April 19, 2010

62, Under a US cloud

THE JERUSALEM POST: A new and largely unexpected diplomatic danger casts a shadow on Israel's 62nd independence day.

Israel turns 62 on a high in many areas. Prudent fiscal policies spared our economy many of the ravages of the global crisis. Time, that ultimate healer, seems to be mitigating some societal rifts, whether they be religious-secular, Sephardi-Ashkenazi, or newcomer-veteran. An IDF bolstered by the successful tenure of chief of General Staff Lt.-Gen. Gabi Ashkenazi has improved day-to-day security as well as military preparedness.

Less encouragingly, a succession of demoralizing corruption scandals is rocking our nation, undermining faith in our public servants. Looking ahead, our internal cohesiveness is by no means assured. Arabs and haredim largely resist full integration, do not subscribe to the state’s Zionist ideals, and do not contribute sufficiently to the economy. Our dysfunctional electoral system, granting inordinate power to tiny parties, still goes unreformed.

As we today make the abrupt annual shift from mourning our fallen soldiers to celebrating the independence for which they gave their lives, however, internal challenges are complicated by a new and largely unexpected diplomatic danger: our blighted relations with the US.

Israel at 62, aware of the demographic threat to our democracy of retaining the entire West Bank, is consensually supportive of a Palestinian state, provided this historically unprecedented entity does not threaten us militarily, or require our withdrawal to the vulnerable pre-1967 borders, or flood us with refugees. To advance these vital terms, we need the US at our side.

Israel at 62 lives in the shadow of an Iranian regime that seeks our demise; that arms, trains, funds and inspires Hamas in Gaza and Hizbullah in Lebanon; and that is speeding serenely ahead toward nuclear weapons. Here, too, we look to America to marshal sufficient economic – and if all else fails, military – pressure to deter the mullahs from this path or force them from power.

And Israel at 62 suffers growing pariah status, singled out for demonization in diplomatic forums, in legal arenas and in the media – its historic legitimacy undermined, its defensive measures assailed, its very right to survive questioned. Iran is central to this assault, bolstered by the bizarre partnership of the radical Left and the fascist Right in much of Western Europe and beyond. Here, once more, we depend on the US’s upright moral compass and the fundamental ethics of its citizens to counterbalance the United Nations and other skewed forums. >>> JPost Editorial | Sunday, April 18, 2010