Moore: Westminster Government Won't Block Independence Vote
THE SCOTSMAN: Michael Moore. the Secretary of State for Scotland, said today that the UK Government will not obstruct or pre-empt a referendum on Scottish independence.

The Lib Dem MP also said his party "would have to be tone deaf" to miss the point that the Westminster coalition had a bearing on their heavy defeat in Scotland.

Lib Dem disaffection was a strong factor in the SNP`s landslide victory which has cleared the way for an independence referendum in the latter part of the new Scottish Parliament.

Mr Moore said: "As a UK Government we will not be putting obstacles in the way of any referendum.

"When we get to the point of a referendum actually taking place, as a Liberal Democrat I will obviously campaign against it." » | David Gunn | Sunday, May 08, 2011

AV Referendum: Britain Overwhelmingly Votes No
THE DAILY TELEGRAPH: Plans to change the way the MPs are elected have been overwhelmingly rejected by voters.

More than two thirds of people voted to keep the first-past-the-post system in what was the first UK-wide referendum for 36 years.

With the count 85 per cent complete, the No to AV campaign passed the crucial figure of 9.87million votes at 7.41pm on Friday night to secure victory.

It was a boost to David Cameron who had campaigned hard for a No vote and a blow to Nick Clegg, who had made a referendum on voting reform a condition of the Coalition deal which is this week one year old. » | Andrew Porter, and Christopher Hope | Friday, May 06, 2011

Liberal Democrats Have Taken 'Big Knocks', Says Nick Clegg
THE GUARDIAN: Lib Dem leader admits party taking brunt of anger at coalition amid worst local elections performance in 30 years

The Liberal Democrats appear to have suffered their worst performance at the polls in 30 years, suffering heavy losses across the north of England, Scotland and Wales.

Nick Clegg admitted his party was taking the brunt of the blame for a perception that the coalition government is dragging Britain back to the Thatcherism of the 1980s.

The Liberal Democrat leader and deupty prime minister said the party had taken "big knocks" in the local elections.

"Clearly what happened last night – especially in those parts of the country, Scotland, Wales, the great cities of the north, where there are real anxieties about the deficit reduction plans we are having to put in place ... we are clearly getting the brunt of the blame," he told reporters.

"To the many families in those parts of the country especially there are some very strong memories of what life was like under Thatcherism of the 1980s and that's what they fear they are returning to. We need to get up, dust ourselves down and move on." » | Polly Curtis, Patrick Wintour and Hélène Mulholland | Friday, May 06, 2011

Kriminelle Ausländer: Volksentscheid spaltet Schweiz
FRANKFURTER ALGEMEINE ZEITUNG: Die Schweiz entscheidet am Sonntag per Volksabstimmung über die automatische Abschiebung krimineller Ausländer. Ein Jahr nach dem Minarett-Verbot könnte das Land erneut weiter nach rechts rücken – Umfragen sagen jedenfalls einen Sieg der Abschiebungs-Befürworter voraus. Doch die Meinungen sind durchaus geteilt.

Das Video hier abspielen
FAZ: Nach Minarett-Referendum: „Muslime sollen Geld aus der Schweiz abziehen“ – Aus Protest gegen den Schweizer Volksentscheid für ein Bauverbot für Minarette, hat der türkische Europaminister Bagis wohlhabende Muslime in aller Welt aufgerufen, ihr Vermögen von dort abzuziehen und ihr Geld in der Türkei anzulegen. Auch Syrien ruft zu einer Kampagne gegen die Alpenrepublik auf. >>> Mittwoch, 02. Dezember 2009

LE POINT: La Suisse va-t-elle bientôt expulser les étrangers criminels ? : Dimanche, les Helvètes se prononcent sur deux textes qui réclament le renvoi des étrangers ayant commis des délits graves. >>> Le Point.fr | Samedi 27 Novembre 2010

THE TIMES: Swiss anti-immigrant party pushes plan to expel foreign criminals >>> Charles Bremner | Saturday, November 27, 2010 (Paywall: £)

THE TIMES: Financial crisis has created fertile ground for the far Right in Europe >>> Roger Boyes, Vienna | Saturday, April 24, 2010 (Paywall: £)

THE TIMES: Hungarian far-right party Jobbik sets up London branch >>> Fiona Hamilton, London Correspondent | Saturday, December 05, 2009 (Paywall: £)

Verbunden >>>

Bild: Die Presse
Schweiz: Warnung vor Anti-Ausländer-Volksbegehren
DIE PRESSE: Die Schweizer Volkspartei will kriminelle Ausländer automatisch abschieben. Würde das Volksbegehren angenommen, hätte das sogar gravierende wirtschaftliche Folgen, so eine Studie.

Der Think Tank "Forum Außenpolitik" warnt vor dem Anti-Ausländer-Volksbegehren, das die Schweizer Volkspartei (SVP) am 28. November zur Abstimmung bringt. Würde das Volksbegehren angenommen, hätte das gravierende außen- und wirtschaftspolitische Konsequenzen, warnt das "foraus" in seiner jüngsten Studie. Das Begehren "Für die Ausschaffung von kriminellen Ausländern" sei nicht mit der Schweizer Rechtsordnung und den völkerrechtlichen Verpflichtungen der Schweiz vereinbar, so "foraus"-Präsident Nicolas Forster. 



Mit der Initiative verfolgt die SVP das Ziel, dass kriminelle Ausländer konsequent ausgewiesen werden. Automatisch das Aufenthaltsrecht verlieren soll, wer wegen eines Tötungs- oder Sexualdelikts sowie wegen Raubes oder Einbruchs verurteilt wurde. Auch der missbräuchliche Bezug von Sozialhilfe soll ein Grund sein. Konflikt mit EU-Abkommen >>> Ag. | Montag, 19. Juli 2010

Now Italy May Follow Switzerland with Referendum on Islamic Minarets
MAIL ONLINE: Italy could be the next European country to consider a referendum on the building of Islamic minarets following the Swiss vote to ban the structures.

Cabinet minister Roberto Calderoli, of the xenophobic Northern League, said Italy should confirm its Roman Catholic roots and hold a vote as soon as possible.

Like the Swiss, Italian voters can have a direct say on an issue if a minimum number of signatures are gathered calling for a referendum.

The League is expected to now start the process for a referendum, despite the Vatican expressing unease over the Swiss vote.

Official Vatican newspaper L'Osservatore Romano compared it to a decision by the European Court of Human Rights last month to ban crucifixes from Italian classrooms - a decision that provoked widespread outrage in Italy.

Calderoli said the Swiss decision was a triumphant 'yes to bell towers and no to minarets' that served as an important example for other European countries losing touch with their Christian identities.

He added: 'Respect for other religions is important, but we've got to put the brakes on Muslim propaganda or else we'll end up with an Islamic political party like they have in Spain.'

Others within the anti-immigration Northern League have called for a cross to be inserted on the Italian national flag to symbolise the deep Christian roots of the country.

Italy has one of the tallest minarets in Europe standing just a metre shorter than St Peter's Basilica, at the Mosque and Islamic Cultural Centre in Rome.

The country has around 1.2 million Muslims, making Islam the second religion after Catholicism. >>> Nick Pisa | Tuesday, December 01, 2009

Erdogan: „Das ist rassistisch und faschistisch“
DIE PRESSE: Der türkische Premier Erdogan übt herbe Kritik am Schweizer Referendum.

Reccep Tayyip Erdogan. Bild: Die Presse
Ankara/Genf/Rom. Die hitzige Debatte rund um das Ergebnis des Schweizer Referendums über Minarettneubauten geht weiter. Der türkische Ministerpräsident Recep Tayyip Erdogan ortete nun in Europa eine „zunehmende rassistische und faschistische“ Haltung. Vor der Parlamentsfraktion seiner Regierungspartei AKP zeigte sich Erdo?an [sic] besorgt über das Ergebnis der Abstimmung. Islamophobie sei wie Antisemitismus ein „Verbrechen gegen die Menschlichkeit“. Die Schweiz müsse daher das Verbot zurücknehmen. Ebenfalls betroffen zeigte sich der türkische Staatspräsident Abdullah Gül, der das Ergebnis der Abstimmung als „Schande“ bezeichnete. Laut UN-Menschenrechtskommissarin Navi Pillay sei die Abstimmung „klar diskriminierend“ gewesen. Vor allem kritisierte Pillay, dass das Ergebnis nur die islamische Religion beträfe. Die Schweizer würden mit ihrer Entscheidung die Menschenrechte missachten. >>> APA/duö | Dienstag, 01. Dezember 2009

International Anger at Swiss Mosque Minaret Ban

Dutch Call for Anti-minaret Referendum
RADIO NETHERLANDS WORLDWIDE: Dutch MP Geert Wilders' Freedom Party has said it wants a referendum on the building of minarets similar to the one held in Switzerland on Sunday . Mr Wilders expects the Dutch to ban new minarets just like a 57.5 percent majority of Swiss did.

The referendum result is hailed as a breakthrough by the opposition MP. "It's the first time that people in Europe have stood up to a form of Islamisation."

Other xenophobic nationalist parties in Europe are taking a similar line to the Netherlands' Freedom Party. Mario Borghezio, a Euro-MP for Italy's Northern League (Lega Nord) called for a referendum in Italy, saying "The flag of a courageous Switzerland which wants to remain Christian is flying over a near-Islamised Europe."
 


Switzerland is home to 6 million Christians and 400,000 Muslims. There are currently 200 mosques in the Alpine country, but only four minarets. >>> | Monday, November 30, 2009

Les sociétés européennes crispées face à l'enracinement de l'islam
LE MONDE: Frontalement, les Suisses ont répondu, dimanche 29 novembre, à des questions qui taraudent, à des degrés divers, l'ensemble des pays européens. L'islam est-il compatible avec les sociétés européennes ? Peut-il devenir un élément des identités nationales qui ont forgé le continent ?

En approuvant l'interdiction de construire des minarets, les Suisses ont répondu "non" et il n'est pas certain que d'autres, à leur place, auraient voté différemment. Car même si c'est "l'islamisme" qu'ils prétendent combattre, c'est en réalité la présence même de l'islam sur des terres chrétiennes que les groupes politiques les plus actifs mettent en question.

Le parti flamand d'extrême droite, en Belgique, et le Parti pour la liberté, aux Pays-Bas, ne s'y sont pas trompés : dès dimanche, leurs responsables ont annoncé leur intention de déposer des propositions visant à interdire la construction de minarets. Il s'agit, pour le député flamand Filip Dewinter, de donner aux musulmans un "signal qu'ils doivent s'adapter à notre manière de vivre et non l'inverse".

En France, la vice-présidente du Front national, Marine Le Pen, ne dit pas autre chose. Se félicitant du vote suisse, elle a demandé aux "élites de cesser de nier les aspirations et les craintes des peuples européens, qui rejettent les signes ostentatoires des groupes politico-religieux musulmans, souvent à la limite de la provocation".

"Signes ostentatoires" : le mot est lâché. Car si l'image de l'islam, dégradée par la violence de l'actualité internationale depuis une décennie, explique en partie les soupçons d'extrémisme accolés aux musulmans à travers le monde, elle ne suffit pas à justifier le rejet de l'islam en Europe. C'est indéniablement la visibilité des musulmans, qui, dans les sociétés européennes, pose problème. >>> Stéphanie Le Bars | Lundi 30 Novembre 2009

As the Swiss Say No to Minarets, I Vote We Have Many More Referendums
THE TELEGRAPH: Why is making decisions for the nation a right of the government and not one of the people, asks Melanie McDonagh.

The Swiss have spoken and, oh dear, the government isn't best pleased. Against all the approved advice, from churches, politicians and business, the people have voted to ban minarets.

The outcome of yesterday's referendum was entirely unexpected, given that Swiss manufacturers, pallid at the thought of Abu Dhabi saying no to Swatches, had lobbied vigorously against a ban. The government wasn't keen on reprisals from excitable Islamists. But notwithstanding all the high-level advice, the people were having none of it.

Actually, the notion of building minarets in Switzerland is pretty redundant. They couldn't be used to call the faithful to prayer because noise regulations, this being Switzerland, don't permit it. Small Islamic communities all over Switzerland just wanted to make their presence felt. On the skyline.

It was interesting, the nature of the coalition against the minarets. The campaign was led by the populist Swiss People's Party, but it was supported, unexpectedly, by Swiss feminists because they have issues with Islam's treatment of women. And – who knows – because of the phallic shape of the structures concerned. In fact, the most notable thing about the poll was that, in favour of the ban, women outnumbered men.

Personally, I blame the Turkish prime minister, Tayyip Erdogan. The opponents of minarets hardly needed to make an argument; all they needed to do was quote, out of context, his pronouncement that minarets are the bayonets of Islam and the job was done. Nice one, Mr E.

Actually, I felt rather cheered when I heard that the Swiss had voted as they did, for the simple and sufficient reason that I like it when people don't do what they're told by politicians. I was ecstatic when the Danes voted against the Nice Treaty; I felt a kind of subversive thrill when Ireland turned against the Lisbon Treaty, though it did vote the approved way second time round.

Referendums are brilliant, precisely because they give people a chance to consider what everyone says they ought to think and do, and then do just what they want anyway. It's the nearest we get nowadays to the full-on democracy of Athens, unless you count reality television.

The sad thing, of course, is that it couldn't happen here. Whenever anyone suggests having more referendums, politicians say, in a grand way: nope, we are a parliamentary democracy. Finis. >>> Melanie McDonagh | Monday, November 30, 2009

Meinung aus Berlin: Sieg der Angst
BERLINER ZEITUNG: Damit hatte kaum jemand gerechnet. Die Schweizer haben sich in ihrer Mehrheit dafür ausgesprochen, den Bau von Minaretten zu verbieten - und dies, obwohl die Regierung, alle großen Parteien außer der rechtspopulistischen SVP, die beiden Landeskirchen, die jüdische Gemeinde, die Gewerkschaften und die Unternehmer sich einmütig gegen ein Verbot ausgesprochen hatten. Es ist eine herbe Niederlage für die Regierung, und das Parlament scheint nicht mehr jene zu vertreten, die es gewählt haben.

Doch um Religion ging es nur vordergründig. Nichts zeigt dies deutlicher als ein Satz auf der Website der Volksinitiative "Für ein Verbot von Minaretten". Wörtlich heißt es dort: "Wer Minarette baut, will hier bleiben." Genau so ist es. Und man darf den Initiatoren im Umkehrschluss getrost unterstellen: Sie wollen, dass die Muslime gehen. Und wenn man sie schon nicht abschieben kann, dann sollen sie wenigstens Bürger zweiter Klasse sein - mit weniger Rechten als Christen. Ein Verstoß gegen das verfassungsmäßige Diskriminierungsverbot.

Aber es geht nicht um Muslime, sondern um Ausländer generell. Sprüche wie "Keine Steuergelder für Koranschulen!" oder "Das Minarett ist die Speerspitze der Scharia" kaschieren dies bloß. Islam und Terror scheinen seit dem 11. September 2001 wesensverwandt. Deshalb eignet sich der Muslim als Sündenbock. In der Schweiz macht der Anteil der Immigranten an der Gesamtbevölkerung inzwischen 21 Prozent aus. Die Ängste vor "Überfremdung" sind da, man muss sie ernst nehmen. Just das aber tun Rechtspopulisten nicht. Wer landesweit Plakate klebt, auf denen neben einer tief verschleierten Frau Minarette als Raketen dargestellt werden, schürt die Ängste, spielt mit ihnen, instrumentalisiert sie für andere Zwecke und behindert eine sachliche Diskussion objektiv vorhandener Probleme. Wer insinuiert, dem Unternehmerverband gehe es nur um die Absatzmärkte in der islamischen Welt, und gleichzeitig weiß, dass die Schweiz die Ausländer braucht, um die Wirtschaft am Laufen zu halten und die Renten zu sichern, betreibt billigen Populismus. >>> Thomas Schmid | Montag, 30. November 2009

BNP: Switzerland Takes Stand against Islamic Colonisation >>>

Women Lead Swiss in Vote to Ban Minarets
Photograph: The Sunday Times
THE SUNDAY TIMES: A right-wing campaign to outlaw minarets on mosques in a referendum being held in Switzerland today has received an unlikely boost from radical feminists arguing that the tower-like structures are “male power symbols” and reminders of Islam’s oppression of women.

A “stop the minarets” campaign has provoked ferment in the land of Heidi, where women are more likely than men to vote for the ban after warnings from prominent feminists that Islam threatens their rights.

Forget about tranquil Alpine scenery and cowbells: one of the most startling features of the referendum campaign has been a poster showing a menacing woman in a burqa beside minarets rising from the Swiss flag.

It seems to have struck a nerve in Langenthal, a small town near Bern where Muslims plan to put up a minaret next to their prayer room in a bleak former paint factory.

“If we give them a minaret, they’ll have us all wearing burqas,” said Julia Werner, a local housewife. “Before you know it, we’ll have sharia law and women being stoned to death in our streets. We won’t be Swiss any more.”

A spoof video game on the internet called Minaret Attack shows minarets popping up all over the idyllic Swiss countryside, after which a message proclaims: “Game over! Switzerland is covered in minarets. Vote to ban them on November 29.”

“It’s a dirty campaign,” said Mutalip Karaademi, an Albanian who leads Langenthal’s small Muslim community. “They’re trying to provoke us.”

A poll suggested the Swiss would narrowly reject a ban but the feminist involvement is having an effect: according to one poll, 39% of women were in favour of a ban, but only 31% of men.

Tatiana, a teacher who had previously voted for the left, was quoted in a newspaper as saying she would vote for the minaret ban as she could “no longer bear being mistreated and terrorised by boys who believe women are worthless”. >>> Matthew Campbell | Sunday, November 29, 2009

Tories Face Lisbon Referendum Turmoil as the Czechs Vow to Ratify EU Treaty by New Year
MAIL ONLINE: The Czech Republic will ratify the Lisbon Treaty before the New Year, the country's prime minister promised today.

In a move that could derail Conservative Party plans to hold a referendum on the EU agreement if they win power at the general election next spring, Czech Prime Minister Jan Fischer said the country will not derail the long-awaited reform treaty.

The Czech Constitutional Court is studying a complaint against the treaty and the Eurosceptic Czech President, Vaclav Klaus, has not yet signed it.

Lisbon cannot take effect unless all 27 EU countries ratify it. All but the Czech Republic and Poland have done so.

Mr Fischer was speaking after talks in Brussels in the wake of the Irish 'Yes' vote last weekend.

One man holds the key - eurosceptic Czech president Vaclav Klaus, whose signature is required to complete full ratification of the treaty.

He says he is waiting for the outcome of a treaty challenge lodged with the constitutional court by a group of Czech senators.

And Mr Fischer, who has little sway over his president, said procedures were being speeded up.

After a treaty meeting by video conference with European Commission president Jose Manuel Barroso and European Parliament president Jerzy Buzek, he said: 'Everything is in place for the treaty to be ready and implemented by the end of this year. >>> | Wednesday, October 07, 2009

Melanie Phillips: If Cameron Doesn’t Stop Blair Being Shoehorned as EU President, There’ll Be No Point in Him Becoming Britain’s Prime Minister
MAIL ONLINE: By the end of the Tory party conference, which starts today in Manchester, it would come as no surprise to find that Jerusalem had been replaced by the Czech national anthem.

It appears that David Cameron is sweating on the Czech Republic to help him escape from the biggest dilemma he faces.

Now that the Irish people have had their arms twisted to deliver the required 'yes' vote on the EU's constitutional Lisbon treaty, a deeply unwelcome ball has been bounced into Cameron's court.

He has promised that Britain would hold its own referendum on the treaty - but only if it has not been ratified by every other country, and thus is not in operation, by the time he comes to power.

Ireland's 'yes' vote increases the likelihood that it will be in operation by the next General Election. Only the Poles and Czechs now stand in its way.

The Poles are said to be likely to roll over soon; the Czech constitutional court is considering whether the treaty is consistent with Czech law.

If the Czechs say no, Cameron is off the hook. The big question, however, is whether Cameron will hold a referendum if the treaty has been ratified. He ducked it again yesterday.

The Irish vote has changed nothing, he protested. Well, nothing - and everything.

Yesterday, Tory Euro-federalists and Eurosceptics were trading blows about this even before the conference had properly started.

However, those who are calling for the referendum pledge to be honoured, even if the treaty is in force, fail to acknowledge that it would not be possible to renounce the treaty at that point because it would have turned into the constitution of Europe.

Notoriously, Cameron merely says that if the treaty has already been ratified the Tories 'will not let matters rest there'. What on earth does this mean?

If he is seriously suggesting that he would then try to repatriate certain powers to this country as he has pledged to do, he is being - to put it politely - disingenuous.

The EU constitution that the treaty brings into being cannot be undone or unpicked.

As Cameron desperately tried to shut this issue down yesterday, he was in danger of thus giving the impression that he did not grasp why Europe is indeed an issue of overriding importance.

If this constitution comes into force, the EU will be changed, unalterably and for ever, into a wholly new entity: a 27-nation superstate with no democratic legitimacy which will nevertheless rule our lives - and, in all probability, with Tony Blair as its President.

It would be beyond intolerable if, at the very moment that the British electorate finally voted out the government he led and consigned Blairism to the bin, the man who did so much damage to Britain as its Prime Minister should be shoehorned into a post which makes him the effective ruler of this country.

For if this constitution comes into effect, Britain and the other EU member states will no longer be self-governing nations.

Foreign policy, defence, social, economic and welfare policies, immigration, internal security - every national interest will be subordinated to this new anti-democratic entity.

As such, 'President' Blair would be committing the single most treacherous act of all towards his own country - taking away its own democratic power of self-government.

And as a zealot whose aim has always been to supersede the nation state by trans-national bodies which promise the arrival of the brotherhood of man, we can be sure that 'President' Blair would make full use of the despotic powers of the EU constitution to impose upon us all a frightening degree of uniformity and control.

So David Cameron would have defeated Labour only to find himself once again being ruled by Tony Blair. >>> Melanie Phillips | Monday, October 05, 2009

EU Ponders New President, Foreign Minister: After Ireland's Vote, Many See Top Post Going to Tony Blair
THE WALL STREET JOURNAL: BRUSSELS -- The Irish answer to the Lisbon Treaty formally opens the gates to the politically charged business of choosing Europe's first-ever president and foreign minister of the assembly of the European Union's 27 member governments.

For weeks, pundits and politicians have been handicapping the field, with former British prime minister Tony Blair emerging as the man to beat, although his candidacy faces some high hurdles.

The Lisbon Treaty calls for the two new posts to be chosen by national leaders and confirmed by the European Parliament. Inevitably, their selection will be part of a continental horse-trading game involving other IOUs among nations, and plum positions in the European Commission, the EU's executive branch.

Mr. Blair could give Europe a famous face and a connection to elites everywhere. As a left-of-center politician from Northern Europe, he offers political and geographical balance to the EU commission president, José Manuel Barroso, a Portuguese conservative. Mr. Barroso, a consensus-builder who doesn't ruffle many feathers, was reappointed to a five-year term this summer.

France regards Mr. Blair as a candidate who has "all the credentials," said a spokesman for French President Nicolas Sarkozy. German Chancellor Angela Merkel endorses the notion of a powerful personality as president, says a person familiar with her thinking. However, Ms. Merkel is concerned that Mr. Blair might not be acceptable to the European Parliament, the person said.

Other factors could cripple Mr. Blair's candidacy, say government officials in several EU countries. Mr. Sarkozy and Ms. Merkel -- who have the greatest weight in the voting -- could decide they don't want the high-profile Briton overshadowing them. Mr. Blair is known in Brussels for propelling the Iraq war, which is still very unpopular in Europe. >>> John W. Miller. Quentin Fottrell and David Gauthier-Villars contributed to this article. | Monday, October 05, 2009

Indian Ocean Island Votes on Becoming Fully French
INTERNATIONAL HERALD TRIBUNE: Voters on Mayotte, a tiny island in the Indian Ocean, decide by referendum Sunday whether to become a full-fledged part of France, a change of status that would end local traditions like polygamy and Islamic courts.

Mayotte, 400 km (250 miles) east of Mozambique and 300 km west of Madagascar, is a former French colony that voted against independence in referenda in 1974 and 1976. It stayed French, with a status allowing legal differences from the mainland.

It has a population of about 186,000 people, of whom 95 percent are Sunni Muslims.

Keen to strengthen ties with mainland France that have kept Mayotte richer and more stable than the coup-prone neighbouring archipelago of Comoros, many islanders have long demanded to upgrade their status to a "departement," or full part of France.

"We may be black, poor and Muslim, but we have been French longer than Nice," Abdoulatifou Aly, a legislator from Mayotte, was quoted as saying in French weekly L'Express.

President Nicolas Sarkozy promised during his 2007 campaign a referendum to allow the people of Mayotte to decide.

If, as expected, they vote yes, a government road map says that Mayotte will become France's 101st department in 2011. >>> By Estelle Shirbon, Reuters | Sunday, March 29, 2009

L’EXPRESS: Mayotte bientôt 101e département français

Le référendum sur la départementalisation de l'île a débuté ce dimanche matin: un scrutin à l'issue duquel la victoire du "oui" semble assurée.

Une femme vote à Mayotte le 29 mars 2009. Crédits photo: AFP/Richard Bouhet et L’Express
Les 70.000 électeurs de Mayotte votaient dimanche pour faire de leur petite île de l'Océan indien le 101e département français et le 5è DOM, dernière étape d'un long processus entamé en 1974, dont ils espèrent qu'il leur garantira la stabilité et une amélioration de leur niveau de vie. L'issue du référendum ne fait guère de doute dans cette île où l'ensemble de la classe politique et les syndicats ont fait campagne pour le "oui", et où les seules voix discordantes sont venues de dignitaires religieux musulmans, qui dénoncent la disparition progressive de certaines de leurs prérogatives.

Sous un ciel bleu et une chaleur accablante, les Mahorais se rendaient à la mi-journée dans les 130 bureaux de vote répartis dans l'île, les femmes drapées dans leur "salouva", grand tissu aux couleurs lumineuses, assorti au "kichali", voile porté sur la tête, et les hommes chapeautés du "kofia", couvre-chef traditionnel que l'on retrouve dans tout l'archipel des Comores. >>> | Dimanche 29 Mars 2009

European Dhimmi Alert: Swiss Government Opposes minaret Ban ahead of Vote
INTERNATIONAL HERALD TRIBUNE: BERN, Switzerland: The Swiss government is opposing an initiative to ban the construction of minarets at Islamic prayer houses in the country.

The Federal Council recommended on Wednesday rejecting the ban when it goes to popular referendum in two months.

The coalition government includes all major political factions except the right-wing Swiss People's Party. It is the strongest in the country and most supportive of the ban.

The government says the proposal violates human rights and the Swiss constitution and would not help combat Islamic fundamentalism.

Supporters of the ban say the minaret is a symbol of Muslim conquest that challenges traditional order in Switzerland.

Many Swiss laws result from referendums. [Source: International Herald Tribune] The Associated press | August 27, 2008

TAGES ANZEIGER:
Minarett-Initiative: Grüne bezweifeln Gültigkeit: Während die Parteien das schnelle bundesrätliche Nein zur Anti-Minarett-Initiative loben, stellen die Grünen deren Gültigkeit in Frage. Sie verstosse klar gegen die Religionsfreiheit, ein Verfassungsrecht >>> | 27. August 2008

The Dawning of a New Dark Age – Dust Jacket Hardcover, direct from the publishers (US) >>>
The Dawning of a New Dark Age – Paperback, direct from the publishers (US) >>>

Swiss People’s Party Force Referendum on Minarets
THE GUARDIAN: Far right groups in Switzerland have collected enough signatures to force a nationwide referendum on banning minarets, the distinctive towers of Islamic architecture.

In what is being seen as a sign of growing Islamophobia in Europe, more than 100,000 Swiss citizens signed a petition to halt the construction of minarets.



Under Switzerland's direct democracy rules, that level of support is enough to trigger a referendum. The Swiss interior ministry today confirmed a vote would take place, without setting a date. Swiss Far Right Forces Vote on Minaret Ban >>> By Matthew Weaver and agencies | July 8, 2008

TIMESONLINE:
Racism Row in Switzerland over Minaret Ban Referendum >>> By David Charter, Europe Correspondent | July 9, 2008

The Dawning of a New Dark Age – Dust Jacket Hardcover, direct from the publishers (US) >>>
The Dawning of a New Dark Age – Paperback, direct from the publishers (US) >>>

Court Challenge to EU Referendum
BBC: Millionaire Stuart Wheeler has won his battle to force a High Court review into whether the government should hold a referendum on the EU's Lisbon treaty.

Prime Minister Gordon Brown has ruled out a public vote on the treaty, saying it does not alter the UK constitution.

But Mr Wheeler said a vote was promised on the EU constitution and says the Lisbon treaty is virtually identical.

The hearing will be on 9 and 10 June. The Foreign Office said they were "confident" of their case.

In March MPs voted by 346 votes to 206 to approve the EU (Amendment) Bill, after topic-by-topic debates over six weeks.

The Bill - which is now in the Lords - will ratify the Lisbon Treaty, which was drawn up to replace the EU constitution after that was rejected by French and Dutch voters in 2005. Court Challenge to EU Referendum >>> | May 2, 2008

The Dawning of a New Dark Age (Paperback - UK)
The Dawning of a New Dark Age (Hardback - UK)

Give the People a Referendum! Let the People Decide!
BBC: European Union leaders are meeting in Brussels to debate a new treaty to improve how the 27-member bloc is run.

Germany, which holds the EU presidency, has called for a fair deal to replace a planned constitution that was rejected by French and Dutch voters in 2005.

But the summit is expected to be tense, with the UK and Poland both threatening to use their vetoes.

The UK opposes any growth of EU powers, while the Poles are resisting plans to reduce their voting rights.

The draft paper tabled by Germany makes several concessions to EU member states opposed to key parts of the failed constitution.

But both the British Prime Minister Tony Blair - attending his final EU meeting before leaving office next week - and his Polish counterpart have taken a hard line during the run-up to the summit. EU braced for treaty rows (more)

WATCH BBC VIDEO:
The British People Deserve Nothing Less Than a Referendum!

Mark Alexander