Wednesday, February 25, 2009

A Conservative Hero Visits the US – What We Can Learn from Geert Wilders

RENEW AMERICA: Appearing briefly on Fox's Glenn Beck show Feb 23, 2009, Dutch Freedom Party MP, Geert Wilders said "we should throw out every bit of hate crime legislation that is ever proposed." Why would he say this and why should we take him seriously?

Besides being asked to leave Great Britain on his arrival there outcast Wilders is also slated for trial for his recent video production of his anti-Koran piece called "Fitna." Wilders is a common sense kind of man with a strong heart for the principles of free speech and an eye for anything that smacks of the strangling of freedom under the feigned hypocrisy of political correctness.

While the trend in conservative reporting in media is full of dire warnings, the Obama administration is barreling ahead with a socialist doctrine and fiscal quackery that seems little affected by anyone's warnings. Top conservative shows are laced with pop quizzes, comedy and laughing at left wing absurdities and general debate Wilders seems more focused and his warnings point back to the social trends of pre-war Germany. Those trends gave the world the Nazi menace that cost the lives of millions, shouldn't we give wilders center stage and our ears?

Wilders has clearly stated that he does not hate Muslims but he hates Islam. In America where our very foundations are all Christian and biblically based the slow apostasy of American Christendom has eroded our understanding of our own Christian beginnings. How then can we be expected to understand Wilder's statement about Islam?

Wilders contends that the Koran is a fascist book on the same level as Hitler's Mein Kampf and that Islam is a Trojan horse that has already been received by Europe and the belly of that horse has already spilled out on the continent with the Islamification of Europe proceeding in all haste. Europe may well become Eurabia according to Wilders if the current coddling of Muslim extremists and the courting of Sharia law are not stopped.

Wilders has made note that while he sees free speech being throttled for the sake of "peace with the Muslims," a Muslim cleric can pronounce a Jihad on a county or an individual with relative impunity. It is reported that al-Qaeda called for the assassination of Wilders immediately after the release of his film and his reward from his own country was a lawsuit invoked by what the Netherlander constabulary sees as an attempt to "incite hatred." >>> By Michael Bresciani | Wednesday, February 25, 2009

The Dawning of a New Dark Age – Paperback (US) Barnes & Noble >>>
The Dawning of a New Dark Age – Hardcover (US) Barnes & Noble >>>
Geert Wilders’ New York Speech

Thank you.



Thank you very much for inviting me. And – to the immigration authorities – thank you for letting me into this country. It is always a pleasure to cross a border without being sent back on the first plane.



Today, the dearest of our many freedoms is under attack all throughout Europe. Free speech is no longer a given. What we once considered a natural element of our existence, our birth right, is now something we once again have to battle for. 


As you might know, I will be prosecuted, because of my film Fitna, my remarks regarding Islam, and my view concerning what some call a ‘religion of peace’. A few years from now, I might be a criminal.



Whether or not I end up in jail is not the most pressing issue; I gave up my freedom four years ago. I am under full-time police protection ever since. The real question is: will free speech be put behind bars? And the larger question for the West is: will we leave Europe’s children the values of Rome, Athens and Jerusalem, or the values of Mecca, Teheran and Gaza?



This is what video blogger Pat Condell said in one of his latest you tube appearances. He says: “If I talked about Muslims the way their holy book talks about me, I’d be arrested for hate speech.” Now, Mr Condell is a stand-up comedian, but in the video he is dead serious and the joke is on us. Hate speech will always be used against the people defending the West – in order to please and appease Muslims. They can say whatever they want: throw gays from apartment buildings, kill the Jews, slaughter the infidel, destroy Israel, jihad against the West. Whatever their book tells them.



Today, I come before you to warn of a great threat. It is called Islam. It poses as a religion, but its goals are very worldly: world domination, holy war, sharia law, the end of the separation of church and state, slavery of women, the end of democracy. It is NOT a religion, it is an political ideology. It demands your respect, but has no respect for you.



There might be moderate Muslims, but there is no moderate Islam. Islam will never change, because it is built on two rocks that are forever, two fundamental beliefs that will never change, and will never alter. First, there is the Quran, Allah’s personal word, uncreated, forever, with orders that need to be fulfilled regardless of place or time. And second, there is al-insal [sic] al-kamil, the perfect man, Muhammad the role model, whose deeds are to be imitated by all Muslims. And since Muhammad was a warlord and a conqueror we know what to expect. Islam means submission, so there cannot be any mistake about it’s goal. That’s a given. It’s fact.



This is Europe 2009. Muslim settlers calling for our destruction, and free speech on trial. All this is the outcome of a sick and evil ideology, the ideology that is weakening us, the surrender ideology of cultural relativism. It believes that all cultures are equal, and therefore Islam deserves an equal place in the West. It is their duty, the left thinks, to facilitate Islam. This way the cultural relativists paradise comes within reach and we will all be happy, and sing kumbaya.



The forces of Islam couldn’t agree more. Islam being facilitated by government is their agenda too. But they see it as jizya, the money dhimmis pay in order not to be killed or raped by their Muslim masters. Therefore, they happily accept the welfare cheque or the subsidies for their mosque or the money governments donate to their organizations.


This is just one example of cultural relativists and Muslim settlers having the same agenda. There is another. Islam considers itself a religion and therefore we are not permitted to criticize it. The left agrees. Although it hated Christianity for decades, now that Islam appears on the scene, they suddenly change course and demand ‘respect’ for something they call a religion.



Again we see the left and Islam having the same agenda: it is a religion, so shut up.



This all culminates in a third coming-together: nor the left nor Islam is in favor of criticism. In fact, given the opportunity, they would simply outlaw it. Multiculturalism is the left’s pet project. It is actually their religion. Their love of it is so great, if you oppose it, it must be hate. And if you say it, it is labeled hate speech. Now here is something the Islam can agree on.



This is the essence of my short introduction today: where the left and Islam come together, freedom will suffer.



My friends, make no mistake, my prosecution is a full-fledged attack by the left on freedom of speech in order to please Muslims. It was started by a member of the Dutch Labour party, and the entire legal proceeding is done by well-to-do liberals, the radical chic of Dutch society, the snobbish left. Too much money, too much time, too little love of liberty. If you read what the court of Amsterdam has written about me, you read the same texts that cultural relativists produce.




How low can we go in the Netherlands? About my prosecution, The Wall Street Journal noted: “this is no small victory for Islamic regimes seeking to export their censorship laws to wherever Muslims reside”. The Journal concluded that by The Netherlands accepting the free speech standards of, “Saudi-Arabia”, I stand correct in my observation that - I quote - “Muslim immigration is eroding traditional Dutch liberties”.



Now, if the Wall Street Journal has the moral clarity to see that my prosecution is the logical outcome of our disastrous, self-hating, multiculturalists immigration policies, then why can’t the European liberal establishment see the same thing? Why aren’t they getting at least a little bit scared by the latest news out of, for example, the UK. News that tells that the Muslim population in Britain is growing ten times as fast as the rest of society. Why don’t they care?



The answer is: they don’t care because they are blinded by their cultural relativism. Their disdain of the West is so much greater than the appreciation of our many liberties. And therefore, they are willing to sacrifice everything. The left once stood for women rights, gay rights, equality, democracy. Now, they favour immigration policies that will end all this. Many even lost their decency. Elite politicians have no problem to participate in or finance demonstrations where settlers shout “Death to the Jews”. Seventy years after Auschwitz they know of no shame.



Two weeks ago, I tried to get into Britain, a fellow EU country. I was invited to give a speech in Parliament. However, upon arrival at London airport, I was refused entry into the UK, and sent back on the first plane to Holland. I would have loved to have reminded the audience of a great man who once spoke in the House of Commons. In 1982 President Reagan gave a speech there very few people liked. Reagan called upon the West to reject communism and defend freedom. He introduced a phrase: ‘evil empire’. Reagan’s speech stands out as a clarion call to preserve our liberties. I quote: If history teaches anything, it teaches self-delusion in the face of unpleasant facts is folly. What Reagan meant is that you cannot run away from history, you cannot escape the dangers of ideologies that are out to destroy you. Denial is no option.



So, what should we do? Is this a good moment for freedom-loving people to give in or to change course? To all-of-a-sudden start singing praise of Islam, or proclaiming there is such a thing as a moderate Islam? Will we now accept the continuation of Muslim mass immigration to the West? Will we appease sharia and jihad? Should we sacrifice gay rights and women rights? Or democracy? Should we sell out Israel, our dearest ally, and a frontline state of Islam?



Well, my humble opinion is: No way, Jose!




I suggest to defend [sic] freedom in general and freedom of speech in particular. I propose the withdrawal of all hate speech legislation in Europe. I propose a European First Amendment. In Europe we should defend freedom of speech like you Americans do. In Europe freedom of speech should be extended, instead of restricted. Of course, calling for violence or unjustly yelling “fire” in a crowded theatre have to be punished, but the right to criticize ideologies or religions are necessary conditions for a vital democracry. As George Orwell once said: “If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear”.




Let us defend freedom of speech and let us gain strength and work hard to become even stronger. Millions think just like you and me. Millions think liberty is precious. That democracy is better than sharia. And after all, why should we be afraid? Our many freedoms and our prosperity are the result of centuries of endeavour. Centuries of hard work and sacrifice. We do not stand alone, and we stand on the shoulders of giants.




Late December 1944 the American army was suddenly faced with a last-ditch effort by the Germans. In the Ardennes, in the Battle of the Bulge, Hitler and his national-socialists fought for their last chance. And they were very successful. Americans faced defeat, and death.



In the darkest of winter, in the freezing cold, in a lonely forest with snow and ice as even fiercer enemies than the Nazi war machine itself, the American army was told to surrender. That might be their only chance to survive. But General McAuliffe thought otherwise. He gave the Germans a short message. This message contained just four letters. Four letters only, but never in the history of freedom was a desire for liberty and perseverance in the face of evil expressed more eloquently than in that message. It spelled N – U – T – S. “Nuts”.



My friends, the national-socialists got the message. Because it left no room for interpretation!



I suggest we walk in the tradition of giants like General McAuliffe and the American soldiers who fought and died for the freedom of my country and for a secular and democratic Europe, and we tell the enemies of freedom just that. NUTS! Because that’s all there is to it. No explanations. No beating around the bush. No caveats.



Our enemies should know: we will never apologize for being free men, we will never bow for the combined forces of Mecca and the left. And we will never surrender. We stand on the shoulders of giants. There is no stronger power than the force of free men fighting for the great cause of liberty. Because freedom is the birthright of all man.

Hat tip: Pamela Geller of Atlas Shrugs >>>

The Dawning of a New Dark Age – Paperback (US) Barnes & Noble >>>
The Dawning of a New Dark Age – Hardcover (US) Barnes & Noble >>>
Aluf Benn: Bibi Deserves a Chance

HAARETZ: Benjamin Netanyahu deserves a chance to lead Israel on the basis of his worldview and with the coalition he forms, with or without Tzipi Livni and Ehud Barak. Netanyahu is coming back to power a decade after he was toppled in elections, and not because the Israelis have fallen in love with his ideas and personality. His dream of bringing to Likud a large bloc of centrist votes, like Ariel Sharon did in 2003, did not happen. But in the 18th Knesset no coalition is possible without Likud.

Netanyahu deserves a chance because his return to power exemplifies the democratic game. There is no other candidate whose views, skills and weaknesses are better known to the public. After his 2006 defeat he did not "tend to his affairs at home." Instead, he waited, as a leader of the opposition, for the fall of Ehud Olmert. Netanyahu also excelled in political maneuvering when he cut a deal with Shas and prevented Livni from becoming prime minister after Olmert resigned.

Netanyahu deserves a chance because for years he has warned against an Iranian nuclear bomb, which he believes will pose the worst threat to Israel's existence ever. Netanyahu felt that some of his predecessors could have done more to curb the Iranian threat. Now he has been given that responsibility. He wants to convince Barack Obama that his presidency will be judged by the results of his dealings with Iran. Netanyahu will not oppose dialogue between the United States and Iran. During their meeting last summer he told Obama: "The target is more important than the method." In Netanyahu's opinion, Obama will try to talk with the Iranians for two to three months, and will find out - as expected - that they are toying with him. Then he will turn to a more aggressive option. The United States has many ways to strike Iran, and Obama has greater legitimacy to use force than his predecessor, who was mixed up in Iraq. From Netanyahu's point of view, dealing with Iran is the key to progress in the diplomatic process. The depth of Israel's concessions in the territories will reflect the severity of the blow against Iran's nuclear program. >>> By Aluf Benn | Wednesday, February 25, 2009

The Dawning of a New Dark Age – Paperback (US) Barnes & Noble >>>
The Dawning of a New Dark Age – Hardcover (US) Barnes & Noble >>>
Pakistan Christians Worried over Sharia Law Plans

RELIGIOUS INTELLIGENCE: Christians in Pakistan have expressed concern over plans to implement Sharia law in the Malakand region.

The move was part of a package to secure a cease-fire with pro-Taliban groups in the region that includes the Swat Valley, but it has caused unease among the region’s Christian groups. Their concerns have been echoed by human rights groups. The concession by the federal government was agreed last week in an attempt to broker a truce with pro-Taliban groups in the region, but Christians say that the introduction of the Islamic legal system renders constitutional and juridical law redundant. [Source: Religious Intelligence] Nick Mackenzie | Wednesday, February 25, 2009

The Dawning of a New Dark Age (Paperback & Hardback) – Free delivery >>>
Warning! Ridiculous Liberal Twaddle! Riz Khan: Banning Geert Wilders

Part 1:


Part 2:


The Dawning of a New Dark Age – Paperback (US) Barnes & Noble >>>
The Dawning of a New Dark Age – Hardcover (US) Barnes & Noble >>>
Asma Gull Hasan: My Muslim President Obama

FORBES: Why members of the Islamic faith see him as one of the flock.

I know President Obama is not Muslim, but I am tempted nevertheless to think that he is, as are most Muslims I know. In a very unscientific oral poll, ranging from family members to Muslim acquaintances, many of us feel, just as African-Americans did for the non-black but culturally leaning African-American President Bill Clinton, that we have our first American Muslim president in Barack Hussein Obama.

I know it's odd to say this. At first, I thought I was the only Muslim engaging in this folly, and I am reluctant to express it lest right-wing zealots try to use "Muslim" as a smear and cite my theory as proof of an Islamic traitor in the White House or some such nonsense. But, since Election Day, I have been part of more and more conversations with Muslims in which it was either offhandedly agreed that Obama is Muslim or enthusiastically blurted out. In commenting on our new president, "I have to support my fellow Muslim brother," would slip out of my mouth before I had a chance to think twice.

"Well, I know he's not really Muslim," I would quickly add. But if the person I was talking to was Muslim, they would say, "yes he is." They would cite his open nature and habit of reaching out to critics, reminiscent of the Prophet Muhammad's own approach, and also Obama's middle name, Hussein. Most of the Muslims I know (me included) can't seem to accept that Obama is not Muslim.

Of the few Muslims I polled who said that Obama is not Muslim, even they conceded that he had ties to Islam. These realists said that, although not an avowed and practicing Muslim, Obama's exposure to Islam at a young age (both through his father and his stint in Indonesia) has given him a Muslim sensibility. In my book, that makes you a Muslim--maybe not a card-carrying one, but part of the flock for sure. One realist Muslim ventured that Obama worships at a Unitarian Church because it represents the middle ground between Christianity and Islam, incorporating the religious beliefs of the two faiths Obama feels connected to. Unitarianism could be Obama's way of still being a Muslim. (And let's not forget that the church Obama worshiped at for so many years had a minister who reminds most Muslims of their own raving, excitable ministers. Even if Obama really is Christian, he picked the most Muslim-esque minister out of the bunch to guide him.)

The rationalistic, Western side of me knows that Obama has denied being Muslim, that his father was non-practicing, that he doesn't attend a mosque. Many Muslims simply say back, "my father's not a strict Muslim either, and I haven't been to a mosque in years." Obama even told The New York Times he could recite the adhan, the Islamic call to prayer, which the vast majority of Muslims, I would guess, do not know well enough to recite. >>> Asma Gull Hasan | Wednesday, February 25, 2009

The Dawning of a New Dark Age (Paperback – USA)
The Dawning of a New Dark Age (Hardcover – USA)
Geert Wilders in NYC calls for an International First Amendment


Hat tip: Atlas Shrugs >>>

The Dawning of a New Dark Age (Paperback & Hardback) – Free delivery >>>
Miliband Faces High Court Battle In UK Over Gaza Rights

THE GUARDIAN: Lawyers for Palestinian families claim foreign secretary's failure to ban arms sales to Israel flouted international law

The foreign secretary, David Miliband, has acted "in flagrant and continuing breach of international law" in failing to suspend arms exports to Israel, the high court will be told.

In what is thought to be the first legal challenge resulting from Israel's operation in Gaza, lawyers representing more than 30 Palestinian families have accused Miliband, along with the ministers for defence and business, of acting illegally by failing to suspend arms sales and government assistance after alleged Israeli human rights violations.

Lawyers acting on behalf of the Palestinian charity Al-Haq said the case would be the first of numerous actions brought against Israel, as activity is stepped up to examine the humanitarian and financial cost of recent events.

"The UK has urgent international obligations that it must fulfil immediately," Phil Shiner, the lawyer representing Al-Haq, said today.

A Foreign Office statement said the claims made on behalf of Al-Haq were "wholly inapt" for resolution in the UK courts and insisted "the government continues to work hard in an effort to secure peace in the Middle East".

"Britain has some of the tightest regulations in the world for arms sales," the statement adds.

"The government monitors the situation in Israel with care in considering applications for arms export licences."

A high court judge will examine the papers in the case and decide within seven days whether it should proceed. >>> Afua Hirsch and David Pallister | Wednesday, February 25, 2009

The Dawning of a New Dark Age (Paperback - UK)
The Dawning of a New Dark Age (Hardback - UK)
Proche-Orient: L'Europe met la pression sur Netanyahou

LE PARISIEN: Les ministres européens des Affaires étrangères ont appelé lundi le nouveau gouvernement israélien à relancer le processus de paix avec les Palestiniens. Le vice-Premier ministre tchèque Alexandr Vondra, dont le pays préside l'UE, a estimé qu'il fallait «aller de l'avant avec le processus de paix», même s'il a reconnu qu'un gouvernement mené par Benjamin Netanyahou pourrait signifier «un début un peu secoué», à son arrivée à une réunion avec ses homologues européens à Bruxelles.

Le ministre suédois Carl Bildt a, lui, dénoncé «certaines conditions posées par des partis» lors des contacts pris par le chef du Likoud (droite) pour former un gouvernement d'union avec le parti Kadima (centre-droit) de Tzipi Livni, le parti travailliste d'Ehoud Barak et l'extrême-droite nationaliste d'Avigdor Lieberman. Certaines conditions «sont clairement incompatibles avec des engagements» déjà pris dans le cadre du processus de paix, a-t-il déclaré aux journalistes. «Il est très important d'envoyer un signal fort que cela n'est pas acceptable». >>> Leparisien.fr avec AFP | Lundi 23 Février 2009

The Dawning of a New Dark Age (Broché) >>>
The Dawning of a New Dark Age (Relié) >>>
Antisemitismus: Die Hamas sendet über das TV Hass nach Europa

WELT ONLINE: Eine neue Studie hat gezeigt, dass gerade junge Muslime in Deutschland von einem ausgeprägten Antisemitismus befallen sind. Ein Grund dafür ist sicherlich, dass der Fernsehsender der Hamas "al-Aksa TV" sein Propaganda-Programm bis in europäische Wohnzimmer sendet. Und seine Zielgruppe sind Kinder.

Am vergangenen Montag wies der Vorsitzende der Grünen und EU-Parlamentarier, Cem Özdemir, bei der Präsentation einer Studie über Antisemitismus bei Muslimen in Deutschland darauf hin, dass dieser nicht unterschätzt werden dürfe.



Er und die Verfasser der Untersuchung machten für die überproportional ausgeprägte Judenfeindlichkeit unter muslimischen Jugendlichen unter anderem türkische und arabische Medien verantwortlich, die "eine sehr verzerrte und stereotype Sicht auf Israel und die Juden in die Wohnzimmer nach Deutschland“ senden würden.

Eines dieser Medien, die zum Hass gegen Nichtmuslime aufruft, ist der Sender "al-Aksa TV" der palästinensischen Hamas. Er in den Wohn- und Kinderzimmern Europas frei empfangbar und insbesondere aufgrund seiner auf Kleinkinder abzielenden Sendungen höchst problematisch.

Bei den "Pionieren von morgen" rufen regelmäßig etwa sprechende Plüschtiere gemeinsam mit Kindern als Moderatoren zum "Heiligen Krieg" gegen die Ungläubigen auf.



Die Plüschtiere dienen auch dazu, den Kindern das Konzept des Märtyrertums näher zu bringen. Denn die Puppen werden regelmäßig von so bezeichneten "jüdischen Terroristen" ermordet, und die nächsten Plüschtiere preisen dann den Märtyrertod und dessen Verlockungen. >>> Von Alexander Ritzmann | Sunday, 15. February 2009

The Dawning of a New Dark Age (Taschenbuch) – Deutschland & Österreich >>>
The Dawning of a New Dark Age (Gebundene Ausgabe) – Deutschland & Österreich >>>
Frostige Stimmung zwischen Obama und Clinton

WELT ONLINE: Nach seiner ersten Rede als US-Präsident im Kongress verteilte Barack Obama Küsschen an viele Mitarbeiter – nur an die Außenministerin nicht. Hillary Clinton hatte sich zuvor sehr desinteressiert verhalten, ihr Mann setzte in einem Interview gezielte Spitzen gegen Obama. Ist das Verhätnis Clinton-Obama beschädigt? >>> Von Torsten Krauel | Mittwoch, 25. Februar 2009

The Dawning of a New Dark Age (Taschenbuch) – Deutschland & Österreich >>>
The Dawning of a New Dark Age (Gebundene Ausgabe) – Deutschland & Österreich >>>
Blühende Geschäfte Deutschlands mit Iran: Bundeskanzlerin Merkel findet mit ihren Appellen zur freiwilligen Selbstbeschränkung wenig Gehör

NZZ Online: Die deutsche Bundeskanzlerin Merkel und Teile der Regierung sehen den schwungvollen Handel mit Iran mit offensichtlichem Unbehagen. Zu Exportverboten oder zur Einschränkung sogenannter Hermes-Exportbürgschaften ist es allerdings trotz den Vernichtungsdrohungen Präsident Ahmadinejads an die Adresse Israels bisher nicht gekommen.

Berlin, im Februar

Der Westen tut sich mit der Holocaustleugnung und der Vernichtungsdrohung des iranischen Präsidenten Ahmadinejad gegen Israel schwer. Politische Führer bekunden Entsetzen und Abscheu, können sich aber kaum zu konkreten Massnahmen durchringen. Sanktionen der Uno und der EU verpflichten Mitgliedstaaten, alle Lieferungen zu unterlassen, die zum Atom- und Raketenprogramm des Landes beitragen könnten, lassen im Übrigen aber den Handel zu. Über den Nutzen von Sanktionen wird zudem gestritten wie eh und je, wobei auffallend ist, dass es selten die erklärten Freunde Israels sind, die behaupten, Sanktionen seien kontraproduktiv, würden die Iraner erst recht in die Arme der Mullahs treiben und die Kriegsgefahr erhöhen. >>> Ulrich Schmid | Mittwoch, 25. Februar 2009

The Dawning of a New Dark Age (Taschenbuch und Gebundene Ausgabe) – Versandkostenfrei innerhalb der Schweiz >>>
Labour Peer Lord Ahmed Jailed for 12 Weeks over Text Message Death Crash on M1

MAIL Online: Labour life peer Lord Ahmed was jailed for 12 weeks today for dangerous driving by a judge who heard he sent and received a series of text messages from his car on a motorway.

Sheffield Crown Court was told Lord Ahmed was involved in an accident which left a man dead on the M1 near Rotherham, South Yorkshire, on Christmas Day 2007.

But the judge made clear the text messaging had finished before the accident took place and was not connected to the fatal incident. >>> By Daily Mail Reporter | Wednesday, February 25, 2009

The Dawning of a New Dark Age (Paperback & Hardback) – Free delivery >>>
Holocaust Row Bishop Arrives in Britain

THE TELEGRAPH: Bishop Richard Williamson, who was asked to leave Argentina after making "deeply offensive" comments about the Holocaust, has arrived back in Britain.

Photobucket
Richard Williamson, the Holocaust-denying bishop, has arrived back in Britain. Here, he is being escorted out of Heathrow. Photo courtesy of The Telegraph

The British-born Roman Catholic bishop flew into London's Heathrow airport from Buenos Aires where he was met by a crowd of international media and an armed police guard.

The bishop, who was given 10 days to leave Argentina by the country's government, declined to answer questions from the press as he was taken to a waiting car by police officers.

Those meeting him, including other Roman Catholic priests, also declined to comment before the vehicle sped away.

The bishop had been resident in Argentina until this week at the St Pius X seminary in the capital.

But after remarks he made in a Swedish television interview were broadcast, the government branded his view "deeply offensive".

He claimed in the interview last month that historical evidence was "hugely against six million having been deliberately gassed in gas chambers as a deliberate policy of Adolf Hitler ... I believe there were no gas chambers."

He added: "I think that 200,000 to 300,000 Jews perished in the Nazi concentration camps but none of them in gas chambers."

The Vatican has ordered Bishop Williamson to retract his comments and the Catholic Church in England and Wales has said he must do so before he can "enter into full communion with the church". >>> | Wednesday, February 25, 2009

THE TELEGRAPH: Vatican Complains to Israel about 'Blasphemous' TV Programme

The Vatican has lodged a formal complaint with the Israeli government over a TV programme that "ridiculed and blasphemed" Jesus and Mary.

In the programme, the host denied Christian traditions - that Mary was a virgin and that Jesus walked on water - saying he would do so as a "lesson" to Christians who deny the Holocaust, a reference to the Vatican's recent lifting of the excommunication of a bishop who denied 6 million Jews were killed during the Second World War. The rehabilitation sparked outrage among Jews.

The host, a well-known Israeli comedian Lior Shlein, also claimed that Mary became pregnant at 15 by a schoolmate and said that Jesus could never have walked on water because "he was so fat he was ashamed to leave the house, let alone go to the Sea of Galilee with a bathing suit."A statement from the Vatican press office said its representative in Israel had complained to the government about the show, which was broadcast recently on private Channel 10, one of Israel's three main television stations. >>> | Saturday, February 21, 2009

The Dawning of a New Dark Age (Paperback & Hardback) – Free delivery >>>
Thanks to Muslims: Fight against Terror 'Spells End of Privacy'

THE GUARDIAN: Former security chief warns searching personal data will 'break moral rules'

Privacy rights of innocent people will have to be sacrificed to give the security services access to a sweeping range of personal data, one of the architects of the government's national security strategy has warned.

Sir David Omand, the former Whitehall security and intelligence co-ordinator, sets out a blueprint for the way the state will mine data - including travel information, phone records and emails - held by public and private bodies and admits: "Finding out other people's secrets is going to involve breaking everyday moral rules." >>> Alan Travis, Home Affairs Editor | Wednesday, February 25, 2009

The Dawning of a New Dark Age (Paperback & Hardback) – Free delivery >>>
Beijing's 'Happy Couples' Launch Campaign for Same-sex Marriages

THE GUARDIAN: Wedding pictures event as gay community fights hostility and discrimination

With her bouquet of roses and fluffy white dress, Han Xincheng looked the epitome of the glamorous modern Chinese bride. But, although her parents had been pressing her to marry, the photographs were not what they might have expected: she is gazing adoringly at another woman, surrounded by onlookers.

The series of "wedding pictures" staged by lesbians and gay men in the heart of Beijing might not raise eyebrows any longer in most western countries, but they are evidence that attitudes are finally changing in a country where gay sex was illegal until 1997 and homosexuality classified as a mental illness until four years later.

There is still no legal protection against discrimination in China and few role models: no mainstream figures are openly gay. Yet now parts of China's gay population are calling for the right to wed - and meeting with some sympathy. >>> Tania Branigan in Beijing | Wednesday, February 25, 2009

The Dawning of a New Dark Age (Paperback & Hardback) – Free delivery >>>
Fatties Die Just As Smokers Do! (But Don't We All?)

THE TELEGRAPH: Teenage obesity carries the same risk of premature death as those who smoke ten cigarettes a day, researchers have found.

Photobucket
Photo courtesy of the Neue Zürcher Zeitung

The number of early deaths in people who smoked more than ten cigarettes a day but were a healthy weight was the same as non-smokers who were obese, a study has found.

Smoking between one and ten cigarettes a day produced a similar risk to being overweight but not obese, the research in the British Medical Journal showed. Teenage Obesity Is as Bad for Health as Smoking: Research >>> By Rebecca Smith, Medical Editor | Wednesday, February 25, 2009

The Dawning of a New Dark Age (Paperback & Hardback) – Free delivery >>>

Tuesday, February 24, 2009

Holocaust-denying Bishop Flies Back to Britain after Argentina Orders Him Out

THE TELEGRAPH: Richard Williams, the British bishop whose denial of key facts of the Holocaust provoked a crisis in the Catholic Church, will arrive in London on Wednesday after being expelled from Argentina.

Bishop Williamson, of the ultra-conservative breakaway Catholic group the Society of St Pius X, was dressed all in black, including sunglasses and a black cap, as he made his way through Ezeiza international airport in Buenos Aires to board a British Airways flight.

A man accompanying him manhandled a journalist who asked Bishop Williamson his destination and whether he would recant his views.

He refused to answer questions about his departure, which followed a decision last week by the Argentine government that his immigration papers were not in order and he should leave the country within ten days.

An interview in which the bishop questioned the scale of the Holocaust and the use of gas chambers was broadcast in the week the Pope cancelled his excommunication, sparking fury among Jewish groups.

The government of Argentina, where he had served as head of a seminary near Buenos Aires for the last six years, said that his comments "profoundly insult Argentine society, the Jewish people and humanity in general".

The British-born bishop is a member of the ultra-conservative Catholic group founded by the late Archbishop Lefebvre.

Father Richard Bouchacourt, the head of the Society of St Pius X in South America, told the Telegraph that he hoped that the scandal and attention it had attracted would now be over.

"This has damaged the society and it has damaged the Pope," he said. >>> By Nick Evans in Buenos Aires | Tuesday, February 24, 2009

The Dawning of a New Dark Age (Paperback & Hardback) – Free delivery >>>
Studie gewährt Einblick in die "türkische Seele"

WELT ONLINE: "Wer sind wir?" wollte eine türkische Tageszeitung wissen und gab eine Art Bestandsaufnahme der türkischen Seele in Auftrag. Die Ergebnisse zeigen die Türken der Demokratie zugewandt, Ausländern gegenüber aber misstrauisch. 70 Prozent finden, dass Frauen nur mit Erlaubnis ihrer Männer arbeiten dürfen sollen.

Photobucket
Foto dank der Welt

Seit acht Jahren betreibt die islamisch geprägte Regierung der Türkei eine weitreichende Reformpolitik. Unter Ministerpräsident Recep Tayyip Erdogan wurde die Gesetzgebung zu einer riesigen Baustelle, Hunderte Gesetze wurden an EU-Standards angeglichen. Zugleich machte sich die Regierungspartei AKP daran, die islamische Identität der Gesellschaft und deren Ausdrucksmöglichkeiten zu stärken. Über Sinn und Unsinn dieser Doppelstrategie wird viel gestritten, aber einig ist man sich darin, dass das Land in einem tiefen Transformationsprozess steckt.

Um diesen zu messen, führte das Meinungsforschungsinstitut “Konda” im Auftrag der Tageszeitung “Hürriyet” eine Umfrage durch. Unter dem Titel “Wer sind wir?” sollte eine Art Bestandsaufnahme der türkischen Seele entstehen – wo steht das Land heute? Wie lang ist noch der Weg zu einer europäischeren Türkei?

Ziemlich weit, wenn man den Ergebnissen glaubt. Der positivste Wert sind 88 Prozent Zustimmung zu der Aussage: Die Türkei sollte immer und unter allen Umständen demokratisch regiert werden. Zugleich sagten 48 Prozent, die Armee müsse eingreifen “wenn nötig”. Im Klartext, undemokratische Mittel sind zuweilen nötig um die Demokratie zu bewahren. Das ist nun einmal die paradoxe Sichtweise vieler Türken – sie sehen ihre Parteipolitiker nicht unbedingt als vertrauenswürdige Demokraten. >>> Von Boris Kalnoky | Dienstag, 24. Februar 2009

The Dawning of a New Dark Age (Taschenbuch) – Deutschland & Österreich >>>
The Dawning of a New Dark Age (Gebundene Ausgabe) – Deutschland & Österreich >>>
"L'Eglise risque de devenir une secte"

LE MONDE: Longue silhouette au visage glabre et à la mèche rebelle, Hans Küng, considéré comme le plus grand théologien contestataire catholique vivant, reçoit chez lui, en Allemagne, à Tübingen, dans sa propriété élégante aux murs tapissés d'ouvrages. Les siens, innombrables et traduits dans toutes les langues, trônent en bonne place dans son bureau personnel. Il revient ici sur la tempête déclenchée par la main tendue du pape Benoît XVI aux intégristes catholiques.

Comment analysez-vous la décision de Benoît XVI de lever l'excommunication de quatre évêques du courant intégriste de Mgr Lefebvre, dont l'un, Richard Williamson, est un négationniste affirmé?

Je n'ai pas été surpris. Dès 1977, dans un entretien à un journal italien, Mgr Lefebvre indique que "des cardinaux soutiennent (son) courant" et que "le nouveau cardinal Ratzinger a promis d'intervenir auprès du pape pour (leur) trouver une solution". Cela montre que cette affaire n'est ni un problème nouveau ni une surprise. Benoît XVI a toujours beaucoup parlé avec ces personnes. Aujourd'hui, il lève leur excommunication, car il juge que le temps est venu. Il a pensé qu'il pourrait trouver une formule pour réintégrer les schismatiques, qui, tout en conservant leurs convictions, pourraient donner l'apparence qu'ils sont en accord avec le concile Vatican II. Il s'est bien trompé.

Comment expliquez-vous que le pape n'ait pas mesuré le tollé que sa décision allait susciter, au-delà même des propos négationnistes de Richard Williamson?

La levée des excommunications n'a pas été un défaut de communication ou de tactique, mais elle a constitué une erreur de gouvernement du Vatican. Même si le pape n'avait pas connaissance des propos négationnistes de Mgr Williamson et même s'il n'est pas lui-même antisémite, chacun sait que les quatre évêques en question sont antisémites. Dans cette affaire, le problème fondamental, c'est l'opposition à Vatican II, et notamment le refus d'une relation nouvelle au judaïsme. Un pape allemand aurait dû considérer cela comme un point central et se montrer sans ambiguïté sur l'Holocauste. Il n'a pas mesuré le danger. Contrairement à la chancelière Angela Merkel, qui a vivement réagi.

Benoît XVI a toujours vécu dans un milieu ecclésiastique. Il a très peu voyagé. Il est resté enfermé au Vatican - qui est comme le Kremlin d'autrefois -, où il est préservé des critiques. Du coup, il n'a pas été capable de réaliser l'impact d'une telle décision dans le monde. Le secrétaire d'Etat, Tarcisio Bertone, qui pourrait être un contre-pouvoir, était son subordonné à la Congrégation pour la doctrine de la foi ; c'est un homme de doctrine, absolument soumis à Benoît XVI. On est face à un problème de structure. Il n'y aucun élément démocratique dans ce système, aucune correction. Le pape a été élu par des conservateurs, et aujourd'hui c'est lui qui nomme les conservateurs. >>> TÜBINGEN (BADE-WURTEMBERG) ENVOYÉS SPÉCIAUX | Mardi 24 Février 2009

The Dawning of a New Dark Age (Broché) >>>
The Dawning of a New Dark Age (Relié) >>>