Thursday, June 11, 2009

Wilders' Party Is 'Extremely Right-wing'

DUTCH NEWS: Dutch journalists and politicians should stop calling Geert Wilders' political party the PVV a populist party because it has all the hallmarks of an extreme-right wing group, says Renée Danen, the president of the Dutch anti-racist group Nederland Bekent Kleur, in the NRC.

'The PVV wants to close the borders to people who belong to one particular religion, and ban the houses of worship and schools for one population group,' Danen wrote in an article.

'Wilders once told De Limburger newspaper that he wants to 'tear down the mosques'. He told HP/De Tijd newsweekly that 'it is okay for the Netherlands to have Jewish and Christian school but not Islamic schools'. In other words: pure discrimination,' Danen said.

Wilders is also anti-democratic, Danen argues, pointing out that he is the only member of the PVV. 'PVV MPs are not elected by the party but appointed by Wilders himself. The PVV meets behind closed doors in meetings where no one has the right to vote. So the main defining characteristics of an extreme-right party - nationalist, anti-democratic and racist - are all found in the PVV,' Danen says. Economic Policy >>> | Thursday, June 11, 2009

THE WASHINGTON POST: Dutch Far Right MP Snubs EU, Refuses to Take Seat

AMSTERDAM - Dutch anti-immigrant politician Geert Wilders won enough preference votes for a seat in the European Parliament, but has refused to take up the position, his party said Thursday.

Wilders, leader of the Freedom Party (PVV), had campaigned on an anti-European Union platform and had said before last week's election he would not take up a seat in the parliament in protest against an institution he said needed change.

He says he objects to EU influence in Dutch matters, arguing the Netherlands should keep a veto right over issues such as immigration laws. He is also against Dutch taxpayer money being paid to the union and Turkey's entry into the bloc.

The Dutch Electoral Council said Wilders had won almost 335,000 preference votes, guaranteeing him a seat. Wilders had not been expected to win a seat because he was listed at number 10 on his party's candidate list.

Barry Madlener, who topped the PVV's candidate list, confirmed Wilders would not take up his seat. "We would miss him here too much," he told news agency ANP. >>> Reuters | Thursday, June 11, 2009
Videobotschaft: Al-Qaida-Kämpfer in Afghanistan haben Geldsorgen

WELT ONLINE: "Wir hier in Afghanistan brauchen Geld" – mit dieser Aussage hat sich jetzt ein Al-Qaida-Führer an Muslime in der Türkei gewandt. Im Kampf gegen die internationalen Truppen in Afghanistan fehle es den Kämpfern an der richtigen Ausrüstung. Bisher konnten sich die Terroristen auf zuverlässige Einnahmequellen stützen. >>> AP/cn | Donnerstag, 11. Juni 2009

REUTERS: Al Qaeda Says Short of Food, Arms in Afghanistan

ISTANBUL - The leader of al Qaeda in Afghanistan says militants are short of food, weapons and other supplies needed to fight foreign forces there, a Web site linked to the group said.

Al Qaeda has been severely weakened in Afghanistan since U.S.-led forces toppled their Taliban hosts in response to the September 11, 2001 attacks. A gap may also have opened up between al Qaeda and the Afghan Taliban, many of whom blame Osama bin Laden's group for causing the U.S.-led invasion, analysts say.

"In Afghanistan, we have a severe supply deficit. The main reason for the weakness in operations is insufficient supplies. Many mujahideen sit and wait and cannot fight for lack of supplies," Mustafa Abu al-Yazid said on a Web site used by top al Qaeda leaders and other militants to post statements.

Nearly 90,000 U.S. and international troops are currently helping around 160,000 Afghan forces battle a Taliban insurgency across southern and eastern Afghanistan, but al Qaeda's presence and influence is thought to be concentrated along the mountainous eastern border with Pakistan.

"If a mujahid (holy fighter) does not have the money to get weapons, food, drink and the materials for jihad, he cannot fight jihad," Yazid said. "Fear Allah and be ambitious in waging jihad through (donating) goods." >>> By Daren Butler | Thursday, June 11, 2009
Race Shame Outrage as Oxford Student Tories Clap and Cheer at N-word Jokes During Meeting

Photobucket
Nick Gallagher: Made a racist joke at election hustings for the student body. Photo courtesy of MailOnline

MAIL Online: Two Tories have been suspended from the party over racist jokes made at Oxford University's Conservative Association.

During a drunken hustings for the next president for the association - supposed to be a breeding ground for future Tory high-fliers - student candidates made a string of racist remarks.

They were asked to repeat ‘the most inappropriate joke you have ever told’.

Nick Gallagher, the publications officer, said: ‘What do you say if you see a TV moving across your living room? “Drop it, n*****.” ’

At the meeting, another student reportedly made a gag about a family of three black people being lynched.

Both candidates have now been suspended from the national party, according to Oxford's student newspaper Cherwell.

A high-level Tory source said: ‘People who behave in this disgusting and reprehensible way have no place in the Conservative Party.’

Both jokes were clapped and cheered on by members of the association, which counts Margaret Thatcher as its patron and Shadow Foreign Secretary William Hague as its honorary president.

Carol Thatcher, who was forced to apologise after likening a black tennis player to a golliwog, was also mocked.
A member of the association's committee has resigned over the row.

The timing of the comments will be acutely embarrassing to David Cameron in the wake of the local and European elections, which left many ashamed at the gains made by the racist BNP.

The Tory leader has consistently tried to shed his party’s ‘nasty’ image by focusing on issues of social justice and equality, instead of tough talk on immigration which repeatedly led his party to electoral disaster. >>> By Daniel Bates | Thursday, June 11, 2009
White Supremacist James W von Brunn Kills Guard at Holocaust Museum

PhotobucketPhotobucket
James W von Brunn (left), white supremacist and Holocaust denier, opened fire in Washington’s Holocaust Museum. He killed Stephen Tyrone Johns, one of the guards (right). Photos courtesy of TimesOnline

TIMES ONLINE: An 88-year-old white supremacist and Holocaust denier opened fire in Washington’s Holocaust Museum yesterday, killing a security guard before being shot in the head.

James W von Brunn, who was convicted in 1983 for running towards the boardroom of Washington’s Federal Reserve building with a shotgun, entered the Holocaust Museum just before 1pm wearing a Confederate hat, and opened fire “indiscriminately” with a long rifle. Witnesses said that he had parked his red car directly outside, displaying a disabled badge.

A guard, named as Stephen Tyrone Johns, was hit and later died of his injuries. Two other security officers at the heavily guarded museum, less than a mile from the White House, hit von Brunn in the head with return fire. He was taken to George Washington University Hospital in a critical condition. Officials said he may not survive.

The shooting, at one of Washington’s most popular tourist destinations - filled with schoolchildren - came after a visit last week by President Obama to the Buchenwald Concentration Camp near Dresden, in Germany. It sparked alarm in the heart of the US capital and caused most of the National Mall to be closed down.

Von Brunn, who claims on his own website to have been a decorated PT-boat captain and lieutenant in the US Navy during World War II, has written a book entitled ‘Kill the Best Gentiles!” According to its preface, its purpose it “to present WHITE YOUTH” with factual information to explain that an “age old CONSPIRACY does exist to destroy Western Civilisation.”

Von Brunn also has a Wikipedia user profile in which he champions the virtues of Western culture and the practice of eugenics. In another article he claims that Holocaust history is destroying Western civilization. >>> Tim Reid in Washington | Thursday, June 11, 2009

THE WASHINGTON POST – Photo gallery:

Shooting at Holocaust Memorial Museum >>>

Wednesday, June 10, 2009

This Sleazy Government!

THE TELEGRAPH: Shahid Malik has admitted that the taxpayer had met the costs of office space in his constituency house and his designated second home in London simultaneously.

Photobucket
Mr Malik said he needed the extra office space because the constituency office he inherited was not big enough. Photo courtesy of The Telgraph

The Communities Minister claimed the maximum second home allowance for his London property while the office on the ground floor of his constituency house was funded through a separate parliamentary “office” expenses system.

The disclosure threatens to undermine the Prime Minister who only returned Mr Malik to government earlier this week after receiving assurances that his financial affairs were in order.

It now appears that Downing Street failed to scrutinise Mr Malik’s expense claims thoroughly before allowing him to hold ministerial office again. MPs' Expenses: Shahid Malik Admits Charging Taxpayer for Two Houses >>> By Robert Winnett, James Kirkup and Holly Watt | Wednesday, June 10, 2009
Klavan On The Culture


Hat tip: Always On Watch >>>
Brigitte Gabriel: An Open Letter to President Obama

With many thanks to a good friend for drawing my attention to this excellent open letter to president Obama, written by Brigitte Gabriel.

Dear Mr. President,

You face difficult challenges in matters such as achieving peace in the Middle East and protecting America from the threat of radical Islam and terrorism. These are challenges that have vexed past presidents, going as far back as our second president, John Adams. I have no doubt you appreciate both the gravity of these challenges and the enormous obstacles that exist to solving them.

I also have no doubt that you and your staff understood that, no matter what you said in your speech last Thursday in Cairo, there would be those who would take issue with you. That is always the case when attempting to solve problems that are as deep and emotionally-laden as these challenges are.

I am assuming it is your sincere hope that the approach you have chosen to take, as evidenced by what I’m sure was a carefully crafted speech, will ultimately prove successful. However, it pains me to say this sir, but, while you said in your speech that you are a “student of history,” it is abundantly clear that, in these matters, you do not know history and thus, as Santayana noted, you are doomed to repeat it. In doing so your efforts, however well-intentioned they may be, will not produce what you profess to hope they will produce.

A wise man once said that if you start with the wrong assumptions, no matter how logical your reasoning is, you will end up with the wrong conclusion. With all due respect Mr. President, you are starting with certain assumptions that are unsupported by history and an objective study of the ideology of political Islam.

You began in your speech by asserting that “tensions” exist between the United States and Muslims around the world, which, of course, is correct. Unfortunately, you then proceeded, incorrectly, to lay virtually all the blame for these tensions at the feet of America and the West. You blamed western colonialism, the Cold War, and even modernity and globalism.

A student of American history, who is not trying to reconstruct it to fit a modern politically correct narrative, would state that tensions between America and Muslims began with the unprovoked, four-decades long assault by the Muslim Barbary pirates against American shipping in the late 18th and early 19th centuries. I find it telling that you mentioned the Treaty of Tripoli in your speech but ignored the circumstances that led to it. That treaty was but one of numerous attempts by the United States to achieve peace with the jihadists of the Barbary Coast who were attacking our shipping and killing and enslaving our citizens and our soldiers – and who by their own admission were doing so to fulfill the call to jihad.

These jihadists were not acting to protest American foreign policy, which was decidedly isolationist, and there was no state of Israel to scapegoat. They were doing what countless Islamic jihadists have done throughout history – acting upon the hundreds of passages in the Qur’an and the Hadith that call upon faithful Muslims to kill, conquer or subjugate the infidel.

A student of world history would know that, for all the acknowledged evils of Western colonialism, these evils pale in comparison to the nearly 14 centuries of Islamic colonialism that began in Arabia under the leadership of Mohammed. The student of history would know that Islamic forces eradicated all Jewish and Christian presence from Arabia after Mohammed’s death, and then succeeded in conquering all of North Africa, most of the Middle East, much of Asia Minor, and significant portions of Europe and India – eventually creating an empire larger than Rome’s was at its peak.

The number of dead and enslaved during these many centuries of Islamic imperial conquest and colonialism have been estimated to total more than 300 million. What’s more, the wealth of many of the conquered nations and cultures was plundered by the Islamic conquerors, and millions of millions of non-Muslims who did survive were forced to pay onerous taxes, such as the “jizya,” a humiliation tax to the Islamic caliphs. Indeed, in some areas Christians and Jews were made to wear a receipt for the jizya around their neck as a mark of their dishonor.

These facts have not been invented by Christian or Jewish historical revisionists, but were chronicled by Muslim eyewitnesses throughout the past 14 centuries and are available to be researched by any person seeking an objective understanding of how Islam spread throughout the world.

You say in your speech that we must squarely face the tensions that exist between America and the Muslim world. That is a laudable notion with which I agree, but by casting Islam as the historical victim and the West (and by implication, America) as the aggressor, you do not face these tensions squarely, but alleviate the Muslim world from coming to grips with the jihadist ideology embedded in its holy books and acted upon for 1,400 years.

Even worse, you empower and embolden militant Islamists who regard your gestures as signs of weakness and capitulation.

The issue is not that all Muslims are terrorists or radicals or extremists. We all know that the majority of Muslims are not. We also know that many peace-loving Muslims are victims of Islamist violence.

The issue is this: what drives hundreds of millions of Muslims worldwide to call for the death of Jews?

What drives millions of Muslims to riot, destroy property, and take innocent lives in reaction to the Danish cartoons?

What drives tens of thousands of Muslims to demand the execution of a British teacher whose only “crime” was allowing her students to name their teddy bears “Mohammed”?

What drives countless Muslims worldwide to actively participate in, or fund, or provide nurture to, terrorist organizations?

What drives Muslims in mosques in America to proclaim and distribute materials that call for hatred of and the destruction of infidels?

What drives entire Islamic countries to prohibit the building of a Christian church or synagogue?

To assume, as you apparently do, that what drives these actions is not an ideology embedded in the holy books of Islam, but rather other “root causes,” most of which you lay at the feet of America and the West, is at best naïve and at worst dangerous.

Lastly, I must address your statement that “Islam has a proud tradition of tolerance.” Unfortunately, the examples you gave are the exception rather than the rule.

Historically speaking, I seriously doubt the Egyptian Copts, the Lebanese Maronites, the Christians in Bethlehem, the Assyrians, the Hindus, the Jews, and many others who have been persecuted by Islamic violence and supremacism, would agree with your assertion.

For instance, Christians and Jews became “Dhimmis,” a second class group under Islam. Dhimmis were forced to wear distinctive clothing; it was Baghdad’s Caliph Al-Mutawakkil, in the ninth century, who designated a yellow badge for Jews under Islam, which Hitler copied and duplicated in Nazi Germany nearly a thousand years later.

I witnessed first-hand the “tolerance” of Islam when Islamists ravaged my country of birth, Lebanon, in the 1970’s, leaving widespread death and destruction in their wake. I saw how they re-paid the tolerance that Lebanese Christians extended toward them. My experience is not an isolated one. When you make an unfounded assertion about the “proud tradition” of tolerance in Islam, you do a great disservice to the hundreds of millions of non-Muslims who have been killed, maimed, enslaved, conquered, subjugated or displaced – in the cause of Islamic jihad.

Mr. President, those of us like me who are ringing the alarm in America about the threat of radical Islam would like nothing better than to peacefully co-exist with the Muslim world. Most Americans would like nothing better than to peacefully co-exist with the Muslim world. The obstacle to achieving this does not lie with us in America and the West. It lies with the hundreds of millions of Muslims worldwide, including many of their spiritual leaders, who take seriously the repeated calls to jihad in the Qur’an and the Hadith. Who regard “infidels” as inferior and worthy of conquering, subjugating and forcibly converting. Who support “cultural jihad” as a means to subvert non-Muslim societies from within. Who take seriously the admonitions throughout the Qur’an and the Hadith to convert the world to Islam – by force if necessary – and bring it under the rule of Allah.

Unless you are willing to courageously and honestly accept this, your aspirations for worldwide comity and peace in the Middle East are doomed to fail.

Sincerely,

Brigitte Gabriel

Brigitte Gabriel is the New York Times bestselling author of They Must Be Stopped: Why We Must Defeat Radical Islam and How We Can Do It. She is the founder and president of ACT! for America, ACT! For America.
Grazer FPÖ: Susanne Winter gibt Führung ab

DIE PRESSE: Winter macht auf dem Stadtparteitag den Weg für Mario Eustacchio frei. Sie will sich künftig auf die Bundespolitik konzentrieren. Demnähst steht die Berufungsverhandlung wegen ihrer Verurteilung an.

Photobucket
Susanne Winter. Bild dank der Presse

Die bisherige Grazer FPÖ-Stadtparteiobfrau Susanne Winter zieht sich aus der Kommunalpolitik zurück. Auf dem Stadtparteitag am Mittwoch kandidierte sie nicht mehr und machte damit den Weg frei für Stadtrat Mario Eustacchio. Sie werde sich auf die Bundesebene konzentrieren, erklärte die Nationalratsabgeordnete. Mit der bevorstehenden Berufungsverhandlung wegen Verhetzung und Herabwürdigung religiöser Lehren habe diese schon länger getroffene Entscheidung nichts zu tun, betonte Winter.

"Wenn man den Bürgermeistersessel anstrebt, muss man den Kandidaten rechtzeitig mit dem entsprechenden Hintergrund ausstatten", sagte Winter zu dem "logischen" Wechsel. Sie hatte sich nach ihrer Wahl in den Nationalrat bereits aus der Stadtregierung verabschiedet. Ihr Nachfolger im Stadtsenat, der Bank-Prokurist und politische Quereinsteiger Mario Eustacchio, sollte nun auch die Stadtpartei übernehmen. >>> APA | Mittwoch, 10. Juni 2009
More Protests Before BNP Meeting

BBC: Protesters have gathered outside a pub in Manchester where the BNP leader Nick Griffin is to hold a news conference.

Photobucket
Mr Griffin faced angry protests when he tried to speak in London. Photo courtesy of the BBC

Mr Griffin was forced to abandon a similar event outside Parliament on Tuesday after he was pelted with eggs.

Mr Griffin, who has been elected to the European Parliament for the North-West region, called on other political leaders to condemn the attacks on him.

But Gordon Brown told MPs that mainstream parties needed to expose the BNP's "racist and bigoted" policies.

At prime minister's questions, he called on all parties to "unite" to fight the BNP by showing they had solutions to pressing issues such as employment and housing.

And Conservative leader David Cameron said the battle against the BNP must be fought "doorstep to doorstep".

About 50 protesters have congregated outside the Manchester pub where Mr Griffin is planning to speak.

There is a heavy police presence there after Tuesday's chaotic scenes in London, when a BNP briefing broke up soon after starting in the face of angry demonstrators.

Mr Griffin said the fact that he was being prevented from speaking was a threat to democracy.

As well as Mr Griffin, a second member of the BNP was elected to the European Parliament on Sunday, for the Yorkshire and Humberside region. [Source: BBC] | Wednesday, June 10, 2009

THE INDEPENDENT: Police Let Mob Run Wild, Says BNP Leader

BNP leader Nick Griffin urged the police to "get a grip" of protesters who forced the party's MEPs to abandon their first joint press conference yesterday.

The British National Party leader spoke out after being besieged by around 40 protesters when he held a press conference in a Manchester pub today.

Mr Griffin, who along with Andrew Brons was elected as an MEP, said: "There wasn't a huge police presence yesterday. The police let the mob run wild.

"I think it's very sad that a hostile mob which is partly paid for by taxpayers and backed by Labour and the Conservatives is allowed to get away with mob violence on the streets of Britain in 2009.

"I've got to go and visit constituents in places like Preston and Andrew Brons has to go to places like Bradford. The police need to get a grip on these people and stop them throwing eggs and bricks.

"Like us or not we are a democratic party elected by people who have specific concerns they think we will address properly." >>> By Lucy Collins, Press Association | Wednesday, June 10, 2009

YOUTUBE: Condemnation over British Far-right Triumph in Europe Elections

Experts: Iran's Jews to Vote for Ahmadinejad

YNET NEWS: He's denied the Holocaust a number of times, and continues to threaten Israel, but the majority of Iran's 25,000 Jews are still expected to support the current president in Friday's elections. 'They want to be on the winning side,' experts explain

Voting stations throughout Iran will open Friday morning, and 46 million citizens will be casting their votes for their next president.

Several thousand of these eligible voters belong to the Jewish community within the Islamic State, and, contrary to what some may believe, experts estimate that most of these Jews will actually be casting a ballot with current President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's name on it.

This, is spite of the fact that he has denied the Holocaust on a number of occasions, threatened the destruction of Israel and continues to move forward with his nuclear ambitions.

There are currently some 25,000 Jews living in Iran, and most of the eligible voters from this community are expected to show up and vote in the country's elections in which Ahmadinejad will be running against prominent reformist rival Mir Hossein Mousavi, Mehdi Karoubi and Mohsen Rezai.

"They are leaning towards leaving Ahmadinejad in his post because Mousavi is unpredictable," David Mutai, Spokesman of the Central Organization of Iranian Immigrants in Israel told Ynet. >>> Yael Levy | Wednesday, June 10, 2009
Margaret Thatcher: The Crusade of Popular Capitalism

USA: Republikaner erklären Barack Obama zur Gefahr

WELT ONLINE: Der neue Präsident sei schon jetzt gescheitert, lästern die einen, über Obamas "nationale Selbst-Verachtung" stöhnen die anderen: Die Republikaner machen ihrem Frust über Barack Obama ungezügelt Luft. Auch die jüngste Nahost- und Europa-Tour des Präsidenten geißeln sie.

Photobucket
Barack Obama ist für viele Republikaner eine Hassfigur. Bild dank der Welt

„Nieder mit dem falschen Propheten!“, ruft Jon Voight am Montagabend 2000 hingerissenen Republikanern zu. „Nieder mit der Obama-Unterdrückung, die unser Land ruiniert!“ Johlender Applaus umtost den Schauspieler beim wichtigsten Spendendinner des Jahres, als er bekennt, er schäme sich für den Präsidenten: „Wir werden eine schwache Nation.“ Und wenig später fordert der andere Starredner des Abends, Newt Gingrich, der 1994 die „konservative Revolution“ gegen Bill Clinton im Repräsentantenhaus führte, Voights Parolen zum Schlachtruf für die Wahl 2012 zu erheben.

Man kann die politischen Überlegungen von Jon Voight, der als entfremdeter Vater von Angelina Jolie sonst ein recht trauriges Dasein in der amerikanischen Regenbogenpresse fristet, getrost vergessen. Doch was Newt Gingrich sagt, hat Gewicht in einer Partei, die sich nach den beiden Wahlniederlagen 2006 und 2008 dringend neu erfinden muss.

Er mag nicht das frischeste Gesicht sein, so wenig wie Dick Cheney und der Radiomoderator Rush Limbaugh, die ebenfalls Meinungsführerschaft bei den Republikanern beanspruchen. Aber der Ehrgeiz Newt Gingrichs (66) für die Präsidentschaftskandidatur 2012 steht außer Frage.

Barack Obama, der sich einer Zustimmung von über 60 Prozent im Volk erfreut, sei „schon jetzt gescheitert“, eröffnete Newt Gingrich am Montag seinen Getreuen. Der Präsident verstaatliche, wie es sich für einen radikalen Linken gehöre, die Autoindustrie, Banken und Versicherer.

Am verwerflichsten und am aussichtsreichsten beim Wähler scheint aber die folgende Anklage: Obama demütigt, schwächt, schädigt Amerika. Seine Rede in Kairo, seine Reise nach Europa waren nach Gingrich nur die jüngsten Exerzitien, um Amerika durch Selbsthass zu Grunde zu richten.

Die konservative „Heritage Foundation“ sprach schon vor der Abreise des Präsidenten sarkastisch von der „Obama-Doktrin“, die darauf gründe, keine Gelegenheit auszulassen, Amerikas vermeintliche Sünden zu gestehen: „Er hat die Kunst der der nationalen Selbst-Verachtung zu neuen Höhen geführt und scheint Vergnügen daran zu finden, die mächtigste Nation auf dem Angesicht der Erde vor Kritikern und Rivalen, besonders im Ausland, zu kasteien. >>> Von Uwe Schmitt | Dienstag, 09. Juni 2009
Gaddafi, the Beau of Tripoli! Now in Rome

Photobucket
Where’s GQ when you need it most? Photo courtesy of TimesOnline
Our Judeo-Christian Nation


Hat tip: Always On Watch >>>
Barred US Shock Jock Michael Savage Appeals to Gordon Brown to Get into UK

THE GUARDIAN: Controversial talkshow host blacklisted by former home secretary Jacqui Smith claims his views have never incited violence

US "shock jock" Michael Savage has appealed to prime minister Gordon Brown to remove his name from a blacklist of people barred from entering the UK.

The controversial radio talkshow host has already announced he will sue former home secretary Jacqui Smith for libel for placing his name on the list alongside former Ku Klux Klan grand wizard Stephen Donald Black, a Hamas MP and the leaders of a violent Russian skinhead gang.

Savage said his letter to the prime minister, which comes after Smith stepped down from the cabinet last week ahead of the reshuffle, provides Brown with an opportunity to stop his £100,000 lawsuit.

Savage, real name Michael Weiner, said that his inclusion on the blacklist was "arbitrary and based on soundbites taken out of context", adding that he had already approached the new home secretary, Alan Johnson, asking for his case to be urgently reconsidered.

In his letter, he described Smith's claims that he fostered hatred and provoked crime as "entirely untrue and extremely damaging".

"I am advised that these allegations are serious and that should I press my claim, I am likely to recover a very substantial award in damages," he added.

Describing himself as an admirer of "the land of Magna Carta, the mother of parliaments and the great Winston Churchill", Savage said he was "shocked and astonished" to chosen for exclusion. >>> Jason Deans and agencies | Wednesday, June 10, 2009

British Engineer's Daughter Jailed in United Arab Emirates for Having Sex with Her Boss

Photobucket
Jailed: Roxanne Hillier was arrested in the dive shop where she worked after police broke down the door. Photo courtesy of MailOnline

MAIL Online: The daughter of a British engineer has been jailed in the United Arab Emirates after being accused of sleeping with her boss.

Roxanne Hillier is serving a three-month sentence following her arrest at a dive shop where she worked in Sharjah.

The 22-year-old was asleep in a room above the store when police broke down the door and arrested her.

It was claimed she was having an affair with the shop owner, an Emirati, who was downstairs at the time.

Miss Hillier was also accused of being alone in the same room with him.

Although the 22-year-old endured 'humiliating' medical tests to prove no sexual contact had taken place, she was convicted over the alleged affair last week.

The dive shop boss received a six-month sentence even though he also denied the relationship.

Miss Hillier's case is the latest in a string to highlight the United Arab Emirates strict laws on sexual relationships. >>> | Wednesday, June 10, 2009
Iran Demonstrators Aim to See Off Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's 'Empire of Lies'

Photobucket
Young female voters are hoping for an end to the repressive presidency of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Photo courtesy of TimesOnline

TIMESONLINE: It was open insurrection, a rebellion of a sort seldom seen in the 30-year history of the Islamic Republic, an eruption of pent-up rage against the repressive Government of President Ahmadinejad.

“Death to the Government,” chanted the several thousand Iranians packed into a football stadium in Tehran. “Death to dictators,” roared the young men and women, draped in green shirts, ribbons, bandanas and headscarves to signal their support for Mir Hossein Mousavi. “Bye-bye Ahmadi,” they sang as they waved a sea of banners for the man who hopes to topple Mr Ahmadinejad in the presidential election on Friday. “Don’t rig the election,” they added for good measure.

Women have suffered particularly badly under Mr Ahmadinejad, and twentysomethings sporting sunglasses, make-up and dyed hair beneath their mandatory headscarves shouted themselves hoarse as speaker after speaker promised an end to repression, despair and the “empire of lies”.

“I feel danger every second I’m on the street because of the morality police,” an arts student called Nina said. As she was speaking another young woman way back in the mêlée scribbled a note and passed it forward. “We need freedom. We want big change. We don’t want liar government,” it declared.

Men and women scaled the floodlight pylons for a better view. Hundreds more crammed on to a nearby overpass. Astonishingly there was not a policeman or basij (Islamic vigilante) in sight, further evidence of how the regime seems to have relaxed — or lost — its grip in the final days of an election far more competitive than anyone had expected.

The biggest roar of the afternoon was reserved for the main speaker, Zahra Rahnavard, Mr Mousavi’s wife. “You’re here because you don’t want any more dictatorship,” she declared. “You’re here because you hate fanaticism, because you dream of a free Iran, because you dream of a peaceful relationship with the rest of the world.” The candidate himself was nowhere to be seen, but that hardly mattered because the crowd was inspired by a hatred of Mr Ahmadinejad rather than a love for Mr Mousavi.

To anyone arriving in Tehran this week it would be easy to assume that Mr Mousavi was an Iranian Barack Obama. The capital appears convulsed by Mousavimania. It is festooned with posters of his bearded face. Fanatical supporters career around the city in their cars, honking their horns and shouting slogans. >>> Martin Fletcher in Tehran | Wednesday, June 10, 2009
Gordon Brown Accused of Expenses 'Cover-up' Over Shahid Malik's Return to Government

THE TELEGRAPH: Gordon Brown has been accused of suppressing a report of an investigation into whether the minister Shahid Malik broke the rules over parliamentary expenses, despite a promise to bring in a new era of "transparency" in politics.

Photobucket
Shahid Malik MP and Tahir Zaman. Photo courtesy of The Telegraph

Mr Brown was accused of "falling at the first hurdle" in his efforts to reform Westminster by refusing to release the full report of an inquiry into Mr Malik's affairs.

Sir Christopher Kelly, the chairman of the Committee on Standards in Public Life, said last night the report should be published.

Mr Malik stepped down as justice minister last month after The Daily Telegraph reported his landlord's claim that he was paying well below the market rate for his constituency home in Dewsbury, West Yorkshire.

Tahir Zaman claimed that the MP was paying less than £100 a week for the three-bedroom house which he designated as his main home, thereby allowing him to claim thousands of pounds by designating his house in London as his second home.

Sir Philip Mawer, Gordon Brown's adviser on ministerial conduct, was asked to investigate because The Telegraph's disclosures raised questions about whether Mr Malik's rental arrangements over his main home breached the ministerial code of conduct.

The code states that members of the Government must not accept any "gift or hospitality" which risks putting them under an "obligation".

It also says that ministers must inform civil servants of "all interests which might be thought to give rise to a conflict" of interest.

Officials at the Ministry of Justice had not been formally notified of Mr Malik's arrangements.

Yesterday Mr Brown reappointed Mr Malik as a minister, giving him a job in the Department of Communities and Local Government.

Announcing the appointment, Downing Street said a report by Sir Philip cleared Mr Malik of any wrongdoing over his arrangement with Mr Zaman, who was once fined for letting an "uninhabitable" home. Mr Zaman claimed that the tenants were already in occupation when he took over the property.

However, Mr Brown has refused to approve the release of Sir Philip's report. The refusal threatens to overshadow a Commons statement from the Prime Minister today about moves to clean up the Westminster expenses system. >>> By James Kirkup | Wednesday, June 10, 2009

YOUTUBE: Shahid Malik: Money for Muslims

UAF Violence: Nick Griffin MEP Interview


The fact that I bring this video to you should in no way be construed as an endorsement of the BNP or its policies. However, I do feel that in a democracy, everybody’s views should be heard, however distasteful we might find them. There appears to be a concerted effort on the part of the establishment in general, and the media in particular, to silence Nick Griffin and his followers. If this is the objective, then there is a better way forward. Nick Griffin and his followers’ ideas should be challenged in debate, head on. This is the correct and civilized way to deal with this matter. Throwing eggs at him is immature and unworthy; it also endears him to many potential followers. – ©Mark

Tuesday, June 09, 2009

ZDF: Rechtsruck in Europa

ZDF Video anschauen: ZDF Spezial: Rechtsruck in Europa >>> | Montag, 08. Juni 2009

Hat tip: Jihad Watch >>>