Photo grâce à Figaro
Les différents programmes de surveillance intérieure ne remettent pas en cause les libertés civiles des Américains et servent à les protéger des attaques terroristes. C’est en substance ce qu’a déclaré samedi le président des Etats-Unis lors de son allocution radio hebdomadaire. Surveillance électronique : Bush se défendMark Alexander
6 comments:
Bld:
People are complaining about what the US government is doing; however, they should start complaining when the US government does nothing to protect them! Then would be soon enough! Furthermore, the people they should blame for this are the Muslims. They are the ones who have made all this surveillance necessary!
Bld:
If one has done nothing wrong, then one has nothing to fear.
Forrest:
What do you mean by implementing a 'chat room'? I don't quite understand what you mean. How would a chat room fit in with a blog? Please explain.
Forrest:
i just read that le pen of france was
convicted for saying that islam would one day rule france and persecute non moslems. (i'm not a fan of his by the way)
No, I'm not a fan of his, either; but I don't think he should be convicted for saying what is obvious.
also that hirshi ali's (sp?) political
opponents may try and have her deported for a technicality on her original asylum application.
Apparently, yes. Strange, isn't it? Her name, by the way, is Ayaan Hirsi Ali.
Forrest:
I'll take a rain check on that. It's a good idea, but one I really don't have time for right now.
This is about as real time as we need at the moment, I think. Maybe later.
Please forgive me for not being 'hot' on the idea at the moment: I have a lot going on right now. It's about as much as I can do to keep the blog up to speed.
God bless you. too, Forrest! I hope you understand.
Post a Comment