Friday, April 28, 2006

’The Incompetent War’!


If ever there was an admission of failure by the Bush Administration, then this is it! The war being waged against the United States and the rest of the West is now called ‘The Long War’! It should never have been allowed to come to this.

The US is doing Saudi Arabia’s dirty work for it! Why? Because GWB and his administration have been too timid to wage the war as it should have been waged: with clear thinking, sound strategy, courage, fortitude and resolve! And with the determination to win at all costs!

The day after 9/11, the Saudis should have been put in the hot seat. They should have been told that it was their responsibility to track down Osama bin Laden and his henchmen, not ours, i.e. not the US’s! Further, they should have been put on notice: The US’s support for the régime is dependent on their co-operation to find these savages.

Why on earth should the US foot the bill of tracking down these savages anyway? Has the West gone mad? After 9/11, so much was made of the fact that the US was not at war with Islam. The fact of the matter is clear though: Islam was, and still is, at war with the West. The West shouldn’t have allowed the King of Saudi Arabia – who is, after all the Keeper of the Two Holy Mosques, and therefore the supposed head of the faith – to get away with hiding behind a smokescreen. They should have been told: Find these people, or else!

George W Bush has been making excuses for Islam. This, we all know. He has come out with ridiculous statements about the loving and kind nature of Islam, statements which are so obviously false. In short, he has placed the West on the defensive. What he should have done is place the West on the offensive by placing the Saudis on the defensive. No war was ever won on the defensive. And this war will be no different. We will not win it this way. Be sure of that!

The Saudi régime depends on the US for its continued existence. The rulers should have been told that if they expect the US (and the rest of the West) to keep on propping it up, then they had better track OBL & Co. down forthwith. If their dynasty would have been put on the line like that, then they would have pulled out all the stops to track down and find the people who are now wreaking havoc with the West.

Political leaders the West over are blinded by oil. Their thinking is therefore muddled. The money being made in the West by the top echelons – and being made often in a corrupt manner – means that the West has been locked into this protracted war. As the saying goes: Our leaders are trying to have their cake and eat it, too. But it won’t work. The result of this protracted war might well bankrupt the States. That, by the way, has always been a stated aim of OBL. The US is playing into his hands!

Why should the Americans allow themselves to be bankrupted like this? Why not let the Saudis, with all their new riches from oil do the spending? They wish to be propped up; so let them pay for it. Why should the American taxpayer foot the bill? And why, indeed, should the taxpayers in the rest of the West foot the policing bills that all this Islamic terrorism is creating? This is ludicrous!

The fact is, however, that Bush and his administration, and the governments of other Western countries, are running scared of Islam. No war will ever be won that way! Name me a war that was ever won when fought from a timid position!

The Saudi régime should be made to feel scared, not Bush and his administration. The royal family of Saudi Arabia would have a great deal to lose if the US suddenly withdrew its support for their régime. For the Saudi royals know that their régime is deeply unpopular at home. The country is, after all, being run like a private family business, with the royals taking a healthy cut of all the contracts going into the country.

I remember well the time when the then leader of Romania, Nicolai Ceauscescu, was heavily criticized for running that country as a private business. It had made the man extremely rich, and, rightly, it was thought to be malpractice on his part, as well it should have been. But for some inexplicable reason, when it comes to the oil-rich kings, princes and sheikhs of the Gulf, the practice is thought to be acceptable, even when the average Saudi is kept very short of money! How strange! And how hypocritical our Western leaders can be when big oil and armaments deals are at stake!

It goes without saying that we need to get the better of this jihad being waged against us. We need to crush it before it crushes us! But as things stand at the moment, we are not going to be able to do that. This is why our strategy needs to be changed, and changed rather quickly, before too much more serious damage is done to Western economies. In short, we need to place the unpopular Saudi royal family on the defensive, we need to put them on the spot, we need to make them take the initiative, we need to make them fight this war for us.

It is not for Bush and Blair to talk about Osama bin Laden as being a renegade who doesn’t speak for his faith. Let the Saudis do the talking! If they consider him (and his cronies) to be renegades, then it should be up to them to find them and punish them.

We need to start fighting this war against the jihad as a real war, for a real war it most certainly is. The kid gloves need to be taken off. If we don’t start fighting this real war soon, instead of this phony war we are engaged in, we will fail; and the fate of the West will be sealed. As things stand, the war we are now waging would be more accurately called ‘The Incompetent War’! For incompetent it indeed is!

©Mark Alexander

23 comments:

Mark said...

Forrest Shalom:

Thank you!

By all means post it. But please ensure that the copyright stays on there. Good luck with it!

George Mason said...

Mark,

You have stirred me almost out of my seat reading this piece. You "rabble-rouse" in a manner that reminds of Sir Winston. I could not disagree with a single thing you said.

You nailed our incompetent president whose tongue has been taken by the Islamists. He struck out with ineptness at Iraq when Saudi and most particularly Iran were the REAL problems. He never dealt with the borders, which have cost many coalition lives and those of Iraqis as well. He won't even bring himself to identify Islam. He has sold his soul, Faustian-like, to the Middle East and to Mexico. He has spent us almost into National Socialism. I think he has become the most dangerous president in recent history because he has set up America for the biggest fall it has ever known, one we might have trouble surviving. Sadly, the pickings for 2008 aren't even good enough to be bottom of the barrel.

My friend, it will fall to the shoulders of you, me, and all the rest of blogosphere where we can all tell that the emperor has no clothes.

Mark said...

Glad you enjoyed it, George. It is our duty to 'tell it like it is', 'cause nobody else is.

Mark said...

Where is your weblog, Forrest? I couldn't find it.

John Sobieski said...

Exactly Mark. Pretending it isn't Islam will be looked back upon as the height of foolishness.

Mark said...

And it's such a dangerous strategy, John.

Mark said...

Thanks, Forrest! I'll take a look.

Always On Watch said...

Last night at the first gathering for the symposium, I heard speakers basically saying, "The problem is not Islam, but rather just the radical offshoots." We'll see what today brings.

Mark said...

Always:

This is a surprise! You must be referring to Richard Miniter. Someone should disabuse him of his false ideas, Always. Perhaps you'll be the one entrusted with the task!

Anonymous said...

Emily,

What a great link! Thanks for sharing it with everyone. Here it is again:

Europe's Response to the
Threat of Global Terror


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
ForrestShalom,

How could France go from a Mitterand to a Chirac? Boggles the mind..........I just don't understand European politics.

Anonymous said...

Excellent post Mark! It is so frustrating to be an American these days and have no real choice in the quality of people who are governing you. Very depressing at times. Although I must add, I still am grateful it is Bush and not Kerry. However, Australia is looking better by the day.................

Mark said...

Some excellent posts here this morning. Thank you all! Thank you, too, Emily, for the great link. I haven't read it yet (it's early morning here), but I shall do during the course of the day. Again thanks.

Mark said...

Filou:

very good post.

Thank you! So glad you enjoyed it.

it's crazy to think that more than four years after 9/11, Bush has still not understood who our real enemies are and how to win the war...

Doesn't it beggar belief? What hope is there for the West when its superpower can't fathom out what's really going on?

Mark said...

Emily:

(Formerly: Very Concerned)

Enjoy your new identity! :-)

Mark, (& Forrest, et al.)

I'd like to 'hear' your much valued opinions re: 'Europe's Response to the Threat of Global Terror' by Jose Maria Aznar (Former Prime Minister of Spain).


Well, I have just printed out and read this article. It is truly excellent; and he says, in actual fact, similar things to the things I said in my book, The Dawning of a New Dark Age inasmuch as he calls, among other things, for Western unity. I have a chapter in my book about that, entitled 'United We Stand; Divided We Fall'. I am so glad that someone as prominent as José Maria Aznar agrees with me. In fact, it's the only strategy that makes any sense. We can't fight this thing alone. It's impossible. Till now, Europe has been woefully reluctant to recognize the enemy and join in the fight.

I think Mr. Aznar puts forward some constructive ideas for the future of NATO, prior to the end of year summit.

He states the need for NATO to undertake wide-ranging reforms in the fight against Islamic jihadism.


He does indeed. This is an excellent paper. I particularly liked his suggestion to invite Israel to become a formal ally. That would be a BIG step in the right direction.

Importantly, Mr Aznar believes that a strong alliance should be formed with Israel, Australia and Japan, to defend the same values against the same enemies.

How right Aznar is, too! By doing this, the new NATO allies could become unassailable.

The following are excerpts from Jose Maria Aznar's comments:-

"The threat from communism is gone, but the danger emanating from Islamic terrorism is now a clear and present threat. ........"


Too true!

"Islamic terror is not just a criminal activity". ............. "We will need more than defensive measures, ......."

True again! Moreover, as I stated in my essay, no war was ever won on the defensive.

"Furthermore, we must understand that jihadism is a global movement in its scope, with different levels of expression, from car bombs to radical sermons in mosques, Internet sites, and TV stations."

It is a global strategy indeed! So it must be fought globally. Not just by one or two countries, with the rest looking on and reaping any hard won benefits. We are all in this TOGETHER! Our continued existence depends on our co-operation.

Mark said...

Forrest:

Please see my previous post to Emily.

Mark said...

Heather:

Excellent post Mark!

Thank you so much! By the way, I know you bought my book a while ago. Have you been able to find the time to read it yet? If so, what's your take on it?

It is so frustrating to be an American these days and have no real choice in the quality of people who are governing you.

I'm sure. Alas, we're all in the same boat in the West! Where have all the strong leaders gone?

...Although I must add, I still am grateful it is Bush and not Kerry. However, Australia is looking better by the day.................

Yes, I agree. Better Bush than Kerry. But that's not much consolation when Bush has handled this war so badly, is it? It's a case of: Better the devil you know than the devil you don't!

Cold comfort!

Mark said...

Forrest:

islam is what they [the French] wanted and so islam is what they got!

unfortunately this is happening in practically every western country to one degree or other.


Yes, unfortunately, this is true. The noose is tightening around our neck!

Always On Watch said...

Mark,
The day after 9/11, the Saudis should have been put in the hot seat.

Instead, we are funding our own destruction every time we fill up our cars with fuel.

George W Bush has been making excuses for Islam. This, we all know. He has come out with ridiculous statements about the loving and kind nature of Islam, statements which are so obviously false. In short, he has placed the West on the defensive.

Thank Grover Norquist for the false assurances about Islam, IMO!

Pandering to and appeasing the enemy have never, ever worked. But here we are, with the clock turned back to the 1930s.

And the economic jihad is on.

Mark said...

Always:

"Many conservatives are annoyed by Bush's nonstop defense of Islam. They say they understood the need for such rhetoric right after the attacks to quell bias against Muslims and prevent vigilantism. But they say it is sounding more and more like boosterism, which could lead Americans into a false sense of security about the threat....

And "boosterism" it is! It's disgusting!

"In part, Bush is currying favor with Muslim groups at the request of Rove, who has worked with Norquist over the years to cultivate Muslims as a new voter base for the GOP, a highly controversial issue."

Is Norquist a traitor, I wonder?

Bush needs desperately to overhaul his strategy. His present strategy is jaded, to say the least!

Mark said...

Well said, Mussolini! Well said! It all doesn't ring quite true, does it?

Maybe, we need to styart on our leaders, BEFORE we start on OBL!

Maybe that's the strategy. We could strip our leaders of their revenue, to start with.

Always On Watch said...

Mark,
Is Norquist a traitor, I wonder?

At the least, he is an "Islamist enabler." Word has it that he has converted to Islam; certainly, he has married a Muslim woman. And you and I know what the rules of Islam have to say about a Muslim woman's marrying an infidel man, right? And we know about honor killings too, right? I haven't heard that Mrs. Norquist has been slaughtered, so I'm guessing that Mr. Norquist is now a Muslim.

In any case, Norquist has ties to CAIR. Worse to many Americans, this probable convert to Islam is an officer in the National Rifle Association. Does he have access to all the members' names and, therefore, the names of many gun-owners? You are British and may disagree, but I believe that one reason that Muslims here are more contained is because so many of us private patriots are armed.

I hope that Mussolini reads the info about about Norquist and the NRA. Mussolini strikes me as the Second-Amendment type.

Mark said...

Always:

At the least, he is an "Islamist enabler."

That sounds like a euphemism for 'traitor' to me!

Mark said...

Emily:

Thank you so much for your gracious compliment! It is most appreciated.