Wednesday, May 24, 2006

Ehud Olmert ready to negotiate peace


Photobucket - Video and Image HostingPhotobucket - Video and Image Hosting
Photos courtesy of the BBC
Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert says he is ready to negotiate peace with the Palestinians but not until Hamas rejects violence and recognises Israel.

"I extend my hand in peace to Mahmoud Abbas, the elected president of the Palestinian Authority," Mr Olmert said in a keynote speech to the US Congress.

But Israel "will not give a terrorist regime a veto over progress or allow it to take hope hostage," he said.

Israel, the US and the EU consider Hamas a terrorist organisation.

Hamas, which dominates the PA, has refused to recognise Israel. It won elections in January and formed a government. Olmert urges Palestinian action
Mark Alexander

Tuesday, May 23, 2006

The brains behind Al-Qaeda


Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting
FROM hideouts in South Asia, the Spanish-Syrian al-Qaeda strategist published thousands of pages of internet tracts on how small teams of Islamic extremists could wage a decentralised global war against the US and its allies.

With the Afghanistan base lost, he argued, radicals would need to work primarily on their own, though sometimes with guidance from roving operatives acting on behalf of the broader movement.

Last October, Pakistani agents seized Mustafa Setmariam Nasar in a friend's house in the border city of Quetta and turned him over to US intelligence operatives, according to two Pakistani intelligence officials. With Spanish, British and Syrian interrogators lining up to question him, he is a prize catch: he is not a bombmaker or operational planner but one of al-Qaeda's prime theorists for the post-September 11, 2001 world. Revealed: the mastermind behind al-Qaeda's plan to wage global jihad by Craig Whitlock in Madrid
Mark Alexander
Letter to Ahmadinejad


"Ah, the good old days, when our leaders had a sense of humor and didn't mind making fun of our enemies." - Michael Leeden


Yesterday evening, I was alerted to this interesting 'Letter to Ahmadinejad [Michael Leeden]' by a friend in Australia. I'd like to share it with you...
Dear President Ahmadinejad,

Please forgive this tardy response to your letter of early May. We did not reply at first because we doubted the letter’s authenticity. We suspected that someone was trying to play a trick on you. The discourse, you must admit, is unusual for a communication between heads of state. However, now that you have openly admitted that the letter is yours, I will respond.

Thank you for your invitation to accept Islam. As you know, I am a Christian. Throughout your letter you accuse me of being a bad Christian, which leaves me puzzled as to why you think I might make a good Muslim. However, before you proselytize outside your own country, you might want to address the condition of the Islamic faith in Iran.

I am genuinely sorry to hear that so many Iranians, especially the young, have lost their faith because of their profound disillusionment with theocratic clerical rule. Apparently, there is no way for them to distinguish between their religion and your rule. That is understandable since you claim there is none, that your authority comes directly from God and you are ruling in his name. It is no wonder you disdain “liberalism and Western style democracy.” Under it, you would be answerable not only to God, but to the Iranian people, to whom God gave certain “unalienable Rights” that you and the mullahs have chosen to ignore. How ironic that, in the name of God, you deny your people’s God-given rights. Read the rest here!
Mark Alexander
Tancredo on illegal immigration into the US
Congressman Tom Tancredo has campaigned throughout the US in support of tighter border controls and immigration reduction

Americans are rightly outraged by our broken immigration system: there are roughly 12 to 15 million illegal aliens in the US, and hundreds of thousands sneak across our borders each year. Tancredo's views, Tancredo's solution
Mark Alexander

Monday, May 22, 2006

If Al Gore says it, it must be right!


Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting
Photo courtesy of the BBC
Former US vice-president Al Gore, who is at the Cannes Film Festival, has warned the world is facing a "planetary emergency" due to global warming.

A documentary based on the politician's environmental campaigning is being screened at the festival.

Mr Gore said the world faced a stark choice between the end of civilisation and a future for its children. Politician Gore appears at Cannes
Mark Alexander

Sunday, May 21, 2006

Da Vinci Code: Fact or Fiction? Heresy or Irrelevance?


Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting
Image courtesy of The Jerusalem Post
For the second time in three years, Hollywood is looking on in suspense as a film connected to the life and crucifixion of Jesus arrives in theaters amidst a global barrage of controversy. The Da Vinci Code, the film adaptation of Dan Brown's massive worldwide bestseller, premieres in theaters across the globe this weekend and opened in Israel on Thursday, with little but promotional trailers and the novel itself available to suggest what the movie might contain.

That, of course, hasn't stopped Catholics and other observant Christians around the world from protesting the new movie, which cost an estimated $125 million and would surprise few show business insiders if it matched the soaring box office totals of The Passion of the Christ, the previous religiously-themed movie to spark rancorous debate with its take on Jesus' last days.

And while Israel has so far been spared the demonstrations and legal protests that have taken place as far away as South Korea and India, interest in the film is running high, despite the country's Jewish-majority population. Brown's 2003 novel has topped local bestseller charts in both Hebrew and English, indicating that Israel has done its part in contributing to the book's phenomenal international sales, which, according to the author's website, have now topped 60 million copies. Fact or fiction?

And then this:

With less than two weeks before the release of the Sony Pictures version of Dan Brown's megaselling The Da Vinci Code, worries continue to mount among traditional Christians about both the book's and the movie's impact. But should non-Christians be concerned?

Yes, we should. Jews in particular need to be aware of the gift Dan Brown has given, in all innocence, to anti-Semites.

As everyone knows by now, Brown uses a gripping suspense story set in the present to inform us that Jesus was married to Mary Magdalene, and that he has descendants living in Europe today. Furthermore, the members of this surviving Jesus family have been protected for centuries by an altruistic secret organization, the Priory of Sion, which is locked in combat with a sinister, violent Catholic group, Opus Dei.

That latter seeks to keep the secret of Jesus' paternity from getting out. Behind Opus Dei stands the Catholic Church. For millennia, the church has perpetrated what the film calls "the biggest cover-up in human history." Should non-Christians be concerned?
Mark Alexander
Iran blocks the airwaves


Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting
Photo courtesy of the BBC
The authorities in Iran are reportedly making new plans to disrupt broadcasts from abroad after earlier efforts failed to stem the tide sufficiently.

The Islamic Revolution Guards Corps (IRGC), a hardline body guarding the gains of the 1979 Islamic revolution, intends to increase the number of jamming stations in Tehran and other cities from 50 to 300 within two years, an Iranian online paper has reported.

The independent online paper Rooz says new technology will be used in an attempt to block specific satellite channels broadcasting from abroad.

The move comes at a time the Bush administration is planning to expand TV broadcasts to Iran, to augment Persian-language broadcasts by Voice of America. Iran targets foreign broadcasters
Mark Alexander

Saturday, May 20, 2006

A sneak peek: What the trendy Muslimah will be wearing this summer! Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose!


Photobucket - Video and Image HostingPhotobucket - Video and Image HostingPhotobucket - Video and Image HostingPhotobucket - Video and Image HostingPhotobucket - Video and Image HostingPhotobucket - Video and Image HostingPhotobucket - Video and Image HostingPhotobucket - Video and Image HostingPhotobucket - Video and Image HostingPhotobucket - Video and Image HostingPhotobucket - Video and Image HostingPhotobucket - Video and Image Hosting
Photos courtesy of Google Images
Mark
Protecting Iran's Muslim Identity


Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting
Photo courtesy of The Jerusalem Post
A draft law being considered by Iran's parliament encourages the wearing of Islamic clothing to protect the country's Muslim identity, according to a copy of the bill obtained by The Associated Press on Saturday.

The 13-article bill, which received preliminary approval a week ago, makes no mention of requiring special attire for religious minorities.

On Friday, a Canadian newspaper, The National Post, quoting Iranian exiles, said the law would force Jews, Christians and other religious minorities to wear special patches of colored cloth to distinguish them from Muslims. Iran bill addresses women's clothing

And this from the National Post:

Several experts are casting doubt on reports that Iran had passed a law requiring the country's Jews and other religious minorities to wear coloured badges identifying them as non-Muslims.

The Iranian embassy in Otttawa also denied the Iranian government had passed such a law.

A news story and column by Iranian-born analyst Amir Taheri in yesterday's National Post reported that the Iranian parliament had passed a sweeping new law this week outlining proper dress for Iran's majority Muslims, including an order for Jews, Christians and Zoroastrians to wear special strips of cloth. Iranian embassy denies dress code
Mark Alexander
Die Niederlande und die Toleranz gehen nicht mehr Hand in Hand


Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting
Foto dank Google Images
Die Niederlande nach dem Wirbel um die Islamkritikerin und Frauenrechtlerin Ayaan Hirsi Ali

«Niederländer sind wie die Riesen in Homers Odyssee», sagte jüngst ein grossgewachsener Amerikaner in einer Kneipe in Tanger zu mir. «Sie schauen mit einem Auge in die Welt.» Er legte eine Hand auf das linke Auge, um das beklemmende Gefühl zu demonstrieren, das einen überkommt, wenn man so unerbittlich in die Welt schaut. «Die Niederlande sind das Land der Zyklopen.» Dieser Amerikaner hat Recht bekommen. Hirsi Magan ist auf dem Weg in die Vereinigten Staaten, um sich dort am intellektuellen Diskurs zu beteiligen, und die Niederlande haben ihren grössten intellektuellen Trendsetter seit langem verloren. Dieses Drama enthüllt etwas über den zutiefst konservativen, protestantischen Charakter dieses Landes, das Menschen, die über die Masse hinausragen, nicht ertragen kann. Der Weggang von Ali ist Teil einer langen Tradition. Das Ende der Toleranz? von Abdelkader Benali

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting
The Eternal Refugee by Val MacQueen
Mark Alexander
Evil is as evil does!


Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting
Photo courtesy of The Jerusalem Post
A new dress-code law reportedly passed in Iran this past week mandates the government to make sure that religious minorities - Christians, Jews and Zoroastrians - will have to adopt distinct colour schemes to make them identifiable in public, the Canadian National Post reported on Friday.

Under the new law, which still awaits final approval from Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Jews will have to wear a yellow band on their exterior in public, while Christians will be required to don red ones.

If the law is approved, it is scheduled to go into effect at the beginning of next year.

Internal Security Minister Avi Dichter responded to the new law Friday night, saying, "Whoever makes Jews anywhere wear the yellow star again, will find themselves in a coffin draped in black." New Iranian law to require Jews to wear yellow band
Mark Alexander
Madness is as madness does!


Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting
Photo courtesy of The Jerusalem Post
"The whole world is moving towards God," Iran's President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has written to his American counterpart George W Bush. "Would Your Excellency not wish to join?"

Initially, the letter was supposed to be a private message from the Islamic Republic to the Bush administration. But once Washington had dismissed it as irrelevant to the issues at hand, its text was leaked to reporters in Teheran.

To some in Washington, Ahmadinejad's epistolary exercise may look like another of his quirks. But it is based on a long historic tradition and fits into a framework of religious practice developed by Muslims over the past 14 centuries. Eye of the Storm: Reading between the lines by Amir Taheri
Mark Alexander

Friday, May 19, 2006

Heads you win, tails you win!


Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting
Photo courtesy of the BBC
Saudi Arabia's King Abdullah plans to set up a risk-free investment fund in a bid to attract small investors to the country's flagging stock market.

Saudi citizens will be able to invest up to 500,000 riyals ($133,000; £70,600), in the bourse - buying and selling on the market for two years.

The individuals can keep any gains but the state will absorb losses. Saudi king plans 'risk-free fund'
Mark Alexander

Thursday, May 18, 2006

Some good news at last: The Emirates to Westernize the weekend
The United Arab Emirates says it will move its official weekend - a decision aimed at helping to improve business contacts with Western states.

The change from a Thursday-Friday weekend to a Friday-Saturday one will come into force in September. Emirates changes days of weekend
Mark Alexander
Ayaan has resigned as an MP and is to leave Holland for the States


This is very sad news for Ayaan, very sad news for her fans, and very sad news indeed for the future of Europe! Isn't Europe simply capitulating to the Muslims, instead of showing grit and determination. Shame on the Dutch!

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting
Photo courtesy of Google Images
I came to Holland in the summer of 1992 because I wanted to be able to determine my own future. I didn’t want to be forced into a destiny that other people had chosen for me, so I opted for the protection of the rule of law. Here in Holland, I found freedom and opportunities, and I took those opportunities to speak out against religious terror.

In January 2003, at the invitation of the VVD party, I became a member of parliament. I accepted the VVD’s invitation on the condition that I would be the party’s spokesman for the emancipation of women and the integration of immigrants.

What exactly did I want to achieve?

First of all I wanted to put the oppression of immigrant women — especially Muslim women - squarely on the Dutch political agenda. Second, I wanted Holland to pay attention to the specific cultural and religious issues that were holding back many ethnic minorities, instead of always taking a one-sided approach that focused only on their socio-economic circumstances. Lastly, I wanted politicians to grasp the fact that major aspects of Islamic doctrine and tradition, as practiced today, are incompatible with the open society.

Now I have to ask myself, have I accomplished that task? Ayaan Hirsi Ali Press Statement on Resignation from Parliament
"Hirsi Ali herself, meanwhile, has announced her intention to come to the United States to work with the American Enterprise Institute. Europe’s loss is America’s gain, but this is no occasion for rejoicing by Americans; Hirsi Ali’s ejection from Holland will before too long be seen as one significant step closer to the extinguishing of the light not only in that country, but in all of Europe." - Robert Spencer, May 18, 2006 FrontPageMagazine
Holland has for some time now been celebrated, or notorious, as a land where anything goes, but now the Dutch have finally discovered that there are limits. Ayaan Hirsi Ali, the courageous Dutch Parliamentarian who has drawn death threats for her outspoken criticism of women’s rights in Islam and unrestricted Muslim immigration into Europe, has resigned from Parliament and will leave the Netherlands. Dutch immigration minister Rita Verdonk has brought this about by suddenly deciding to press the fact -- which has actually been public knowledge for years, and has never caused controversy before -- that the Somalia-born Hirsi Ali lied in her request for asylum in the Netherlands was grounds to strip her of her Dutch citizenship.

Read the rest of Robert Spencer's excellent article here: Holland's Cassandra

America to welcome Hirsi Ali with open arms
Mark Alexander
Left wing out to lunch again! This time in France!
The French parliament has given strong backing to a controversial immigration bill that will make it more difficult for the unskilled to settle in France.

The bill, which offers renewable residence permits to highly-qualified newcomers from outside the EU, was passed by 367 votes to 164.

Interior Minister Nicolas Sarkozy says it will bring France into line with countries with selective immigration.
But the left-wing opposition and human rights groups say the bill is racist. MPs back French immigration bill
Mark Alexander

Wednesday, May 17, 2006

Secularism under attack in Turkey


Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting
Photo courtesy of the BBC
A gunman has shot dead a prominent judge and wounded four others in an attack in Turkey's highest court, in the capital, Ankara.

Judge Mustafa Yucel Ozbilgin died despite six hours of surgery to remove a bullet from his brain.

One of the wounded judges had been criticised for ruling against teachers wearing Muslim headscarves, and had reportedly received death threats.

The attacker, believed to be a lawyer, was detained by police.

Identified as Aslan Alpaslan, 29, he is being questioned to determine his motive.

But the BBC's Sarah Rainsford in Istanbul says many here already see this as an attack on secularism itself - the founding principle of the Turkish republic. Judge dies in Turkey court attack

Turks protest over judge shooting
Mark Alexander

Tuesday, May 16, 2006

On Bush


Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting
Photo courtesy of Google Images
The US dollar is in freefall. Illegal immigration is out of control. The Federal budget deficit is astronomical at $400bn, because of a trade deficit spiralling out of control. That now stands at $742bn, which equates to 7% of the US economy! The war in Iraq is going badly, attempts to gloss over the reality notwithstanding. Manufacturing and service jobs are relocating abroad, to countries where labour costs are far, far lower.

The result: The weakening of America. The United States of America is weak because it lacks strong, determined, decisive leadership, because its economy has been allowed to drift, and because it has allowed itself to get involved in a war in a far off land about which it understands little. The war has become a drain on the American economy. And there is little prospect in sight of its being brought to an end. In fact, with Iran flexing its muscles, and with that country determined to develop nuclear capabilities, the prospect for America is looking bleaker than ever.

This is a very worrying development: The free world needs a strong America. It is the free world’s only hope. If America fails, the world will be plunged into darkness.

World economic developments and changes in the balance of power mean that one has to ask the question: Are we witnessing the beginning of the end of the US as the world’s superpower. After all, China is coming up quickly and strong; it’s flourishing. Inward investment is large and valuable. It has a ready supply of cheap labour, and a ready market for its goods due to the enormous population of China. Those who work there also have to consume. After years of hardline communist rule, the Chinese have got a lot of catching up to do, too. Which can only be a boost for the Chinese economy.

One cannot help but ask one pertinent question: Has the US government deliberately turned a blind eye to the enormity of the problem with illegal aliens from Mexico till now to try and compete with the cheap labour available in China? Is it trying to make the US economy more competitive again by allowing these people into the country? There seems to be no other logical explanation for the authorities’ tardiness and reluctance to deal with the problem.

It seems to me that the US government is guilty of playing fast and loose with the country’s future. Can there really be rational, coherent, well-defined economic, foreign and immigration policies underlying all this? Or is the government simply being reactive – reactive to events, both economic and political – as they unfold? It seems to me that there is much of the latter going on. There seems to be little coordinated policy to bring the US back to the health the American people deserve.

At a time when Islam is gaining so much in strength, we need a strong America more than ever. Islamofascism is the greatest threat to the free world since Nazism and communism. The US, with the help of its die-hard and staunch allies, the British and Commonwealth nations, was able to defeat these two ‘isms’. We are showing little resolve to defeat Islamofascism. Indeed, till now, the enemy we face has not even been properly defined; instead, we are told that we are at war with Islamic terrorism. This is something else that Bush has failed to come to grips with. The nature of the enemy!

But then, what can we expect from a president who cannot even control the borders of the country he presides over? Can we really expect of him that he be able to defeat the enemy?

There needs to be a fundamental re-think by the White House staff on all these issues. Is it, perhaps, time to reintroduce the use of the P-word? For years now, protectionism has been extremely unfashionable; and it has been held in a bad light. But can America really go on trying to compete with economies, without a little help of protectionism, with countries whose economic circumstances are so totally different from its own?

How realistic is it for Americans to try and compete with the Chinese who can produce everything so much cheaper than the Americans can? Or does the US government want all jobs to be relocated to China. Does it wish to become a nation of consumers, building up ever larger national debt?

When one of our children is weak, we, as parents, shelter and protect it till it grows up to be big and strong. Why should this not be the case with economies also? After all, it’s what the Japanese did for many, many years. What makes the US so different?

You see, it’s all well and good to argue for open competition on the world markets. It’s a great idea in theory. But for that to work well, there has to be a level playing field. The Chinese, for example, are not willing to play the economic game on a level playing field. The Chinese yuan, as a case in point, needs to be revalued. But if China revalued its currency, it would make it more difficult for China to attract as much inward investment. Hence it is reluctant to do so.

It is very clear to me: President Bush needs to start getting tougher. He needs to be tougher on illegal immigrants, tougher in his foreign policy, tougher in his economic policies, tougher on Islam, tougher, actually, in all he pursues.

President Bush, unless he does a U-turn on many aspects of his policies, will leave the US much, much weaker than it was when he took office. This will not be a good legacy for him to leave the nation. As a result, history will judge him harshly on it.

Mr. President: Step up to the plate before it’s too late! Remember this: Mrs. Thatcher used to say that the best decisions are the tough decisions.

Mrs Thatcher was a great leader. Great leaders have many characteristics in common. Perhaps above all, they have vision. They are decisive. They couldn’t care less what others think of them. They have set standards, and they stick to them. They are honest. They expect a lot from the people they lead. They show those they lead what to do, and ensure these things get done. But they also listen.

How do you measure up, Mr. Bush?

15 Characteristics of Great Leadership
©Mark Alexander
Dutch authorities getting tough on Ayaan Hirsi Ali


Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting
Photo courtesy of the BBC
The controversial Somali-born Dutch MP Ayaan Hirsi Ali is under pressure to quit parliament amid revelations that she falsified her asylum application.

Dutch media say she will move to Washington to work for the conservative American Enterprise Institute.

A TV documentary about her, shown last week, triggered calls for her to be stripped of her Dutch passport.

Ms Hirsi Ali, a fierce critic of conservative Islam, is under 24-hour police protection.

She has received death threats since the murder of film-maker Theo van Gogh, who was stabbed by a radical Islamist, Mohammed Bouyeri, in November 2004.

She wrote the script for Van Gogh's TV film Submission, which angered many Muslims.

Ms Hirsi Ali did not deny that she had lied in her 1992 asylum application, her spokeswoman Ingrid Pouw told the BBC News website. Dutch MP lashed by asylum storm
Mark Alexander

Monday, May 15, 2006

A message from some Saudi dissidents


I remember well the time I could surf the Web and find Saudhouse.com. It was a very interesting website, expressing opinions of Saudis intent on reform. It was soon taken offline. The Saudi authorities couldn't stand the heat.

I am taking the liberty of publishing one of the articles I read at that time. It is too enlightening to be ignored.

Naturally, I have been unable to contact the author of this piece to ask for permission. Indeed, the author is unknown. He had to remain so for his own safety. I trust he will be happy for me to republish his work. Here it is for you to 'enjoy', unaltered (except for some minimal changes to paragraphs here and there) and unabridged:
How al-Saud view Saudis and Foreigner. Saudhouse.com. September 20, 1996

The history of al-Saud family is quite interesting. It spans three different eras with the last being the most visible and the most publicized because of the discovery of oil.

Going back to its modern founder Ibn Saud, Saudi Arabia found its place in history through secret conspiracies that initially pegged cousins against cousins and tribes against tribes. Today, it pegs nations against nations and still churns out enough secrets and conspiracies to keep it in the limelight.

Al-Saud have financed fundamentalism in neighboring countries. They have financed the Iran-Contra operations against the will of US Congress and the laws of the United States. They have financed Mujaheddin in Afghanistan. They have financed Iraq against Iran. They have started two wars in Yemen and failed in both of them. They have financed French elections using their cronies on both sides of the isle. This is what we know. What we do not know is the iceberg itself.

Armed with a keen disposition to interfere in affairs of other nations around the globe, this country of 12 million had used its money and influence to peddle everything and anything. Along the way, we have seen al-Saud's own views of the world and the people around them. A heated conversation in 1980, at the height of Saudi power and oil surplus, took place between this author and a closed associate of the royal family and considered part of their inner circle at the Fouquet cafe on the Champs Elysees in Paris. The conversation centered around Saudi role in world affairs having been thrusted [sic] onto the scene at a time when western economies were still stagnating from higher oil prices and other factors one of which the taking of hostages by Iran and the low self-esteem the US endured during that period.

I asked my esteemed acquaintance the following question : "What do you think Saudi Arabia's role will be in world affairs by the year 2000?" His answer was unequivocally strong and determined. No hesitation. "Saudi Arabia will, in 20 years, own the United States" Thoughts like these are groomed and discussed and do not land in someone's mind after a long dream. It was without a shadow of a doubt that this uttered sentence by this worldly gentleman had roots at much higher levels within the Saudi government. How else can one explain the lack of hesitation or the lack of consternation on his behalf given that al-Saud foreign policy centers around them and around them only ? I wish I could meet with this same person today in September of 1996 to remind him of his answer.

The Al-Saud clan categorizes people in four distinct categories. Since no one has scientifically studied that subject before, we feel it is appropriate to give titles to these categories based on our understanding of the family.

Masters Servants - High and Low Slaves Owned - Privileged and Unprivileged Each of these categories may have sub-categories that may explain further the inter-relationship of al-Saud within that category.

MASTERS : in this category you will find people whom al-Saud think of them as superior in economic and political power. Ibn Saud started a tradition when he met with Roosevelt at the end of World War II when he agreed to oil concessions to American companies at ridiculous prices. That historic meeting and the pursuant policy of al-Saud with the Americans truly puts the Americans as masters of al-Saud. Very few requests are refused, very few demands are questioned. A true master/slave relationship. Within that category, other sub-category exist that explain al-Saud relationship with other powerful allies or nations. Such is true of China or France where a demand is not refused but questioned and only approved if the US approves as well. This cautious dynamic relationship can be best described as two male siblings one who is powerful and one who is weak with a half-sister seeking favoritism.

SERVANTS : This category is divided into two distinct sub-categories, the High Servant and the Low Servant. The High Servant is close to the royal family whose job is to serve their immediate needs. These immediate needs are as different and complex as the life of a human being. A High Servant is a front businessman who steals the money on behalf of the Saudi prince. A high Servant is one that takes care of the family of an al-Saud such as shopping needs or personal needs. Another one serves the Prince drugs or women, and so on... These people can make a lot of money if they play their role with total discretion. A business High Servant easily becomes a billionaire such as Rafic Hariri, the prime minister of Lebanon or the late Akram Ojjeh or Wafic Said etc... A personal High Servant such as Ali bin Mussallam can become billionaire faster because he may control personal business matters such as oil deals where the true value and true payments are never known to the King or his immediate family. The area is too complex and fraud is easy. Many High Servants are non-Saudis because al-Saud treat their own people under a different category. The Low Servant is a typical middle class manager mainly a Palestinian or Lebanese or Egyptian who in reality has built Saudi Arabia. These people are indistinguishable to al-Saud and are considered as a necessary low maintenance, low cost commodity very much to how a family man considers potatoes : low cost yet useful to keep his household happy. Once in a while a Low Servant graduates to a High Servant because he catches the eye of a family member of al-Saud. This is what happened to Rafic Hariri before he became a High Servant. He was a middle manager at the finance ministry in Saudi Arabia where he was introduced to King Fahd who fancied him.

SLAVES : In this category we find third world workers who have demenial jobs in Saudi Arabia such as maids, taxi drivers, bus boys, etc... These people have as much rights as a deer in a tiger park. They are abused, beaten, raped, and sometimes killed with no legal recourse. Al-Saud condone the way treatment is accorded to these people by the masses. Many Human Rights organizations have complained about the abuse subjected to these poor souls but with no political will on behalf of western nations to upset an exporter of oil, these peoples have mostly relied on international organizations for a merciful treatment while in Saudi Arabia. In fact, many of these organizations consider the testament of foreign workers as slavery and sometimes worse.

OWNED : Two distinct sub-categories constitute the make-up of this category. Privileged Owned and Unprivileged Owned. Owned is a term describing how al-Saud feel about their own people. The term describes correctly the fact that al-Saud "OWN" these people lock, stock, and all. To argue with them that they feel they own all of the oil in Saudi Arabia is an exercise in futility. To argue with them that they think they also own the people of Saudi Arabia is more difficult than arguing about the oil. Al-Saud reason that if they own the people then they own the land and thus the oil. The logical step is to treat people as if they own them. Decree after decree only goes to prove this point. The latest decree forbids people to name their children certain names. If that is not ownership, we do not know what is. The Privileged Owned are those merchant Saudi families and Saudi businessmen whether rich or not who must please, pay, kiss up to, and sustain any al-Saud member in order to survive in their totalitarian regime.

No Saudi businessman who has ever displeased a royalty did any considerable business in Saudi Arabia. Like the infamous black list created to punish Israel, Saudi businessmen are blacklisted if they do not abide by a certain unethical code that include almost all of the times paying off an al-Saud to get his business going. The Privileged Owned are subjected to a routine that tax them heavily in financial and moral terms. This Saudi club between an owner and an ownee has been around ever since al-Saud have been in power. Not one case exist in the history of that country where someone disagreed with the government publicly and was not punished severely for stepping out of line. Even al-Saud members are not exempt from that punishment. When Prince Talal bin Abdul Aziz started an organization called Free Princes in Egypt in the early seventies that opposed the way the country was being run, it took him over twenty years to gain back the confidence of his peers and to be forgiven. His love for children landed him a job to head the UNICEF at the U.N.

The Unprivileged Owned are the rest of the Saudi populace who have no one but al-Saud to get their grievances heard and who represent the majority of Saudis made up of illiterate tribal people. These people have no power, no understanding of the rule of al-Saud, no mental capacity to fight or oppose, and no will to elevate themselves from the quagmire they find themselves in. A rumor once circulated in the ministries that al-Saud wanted that populace to remain ignorant and uneducated because they served an essential social service with their blind obedience and misunderstanding of the ill deeds practiced by al-Saud every day. They represent the majority of the population and mostly live a simple life with agriculture as a primary source of income and life cycle.Al-Saud think they also own these people and treat them sometimes with pity and sometimes with harshness depending on the level of obedience and loyalty they can inject into the corrupt system of al-Saud.
Mark Alexander
Prince Al Waleed bin Talal doing his thing again


Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting
The thoroughly modern Sabreen! Photo courtesy of the Christian Science Monitor
CAIRO – The Egyptian actress Sabreen was at the peak of her fame when, in 2001, she underwent a religious "awakening," retired from acting, and donned the veil.

Now she's back on television, hosting a talk show on a new Islamic satellite channel called Al Risala ("The Message"). Sabreen, who is still a household name thanks to the popular films and TV shows she used to appear in, says she chose to make her come-back on Al Risala because the channel "talks about Islam in an enlightened, moderate way ... a very honest and frank way."

She's a far cry from the bearded men in white robes who dominate traditional religious programming here. With her smiling face framed by a stylish, sequined veil, Sabreen has become the spokesperson for a new sort of Islam: media-savvy, modern, and moderate. Her producers say they hope she will be the Muslim world's Oprah. The new Muslim TV: media-savvy, modern, and moderate by Ursula Lindsey
Mark Alexander
How realistic is it to teach British values to Muslims?


Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting
Photo courtesy of the BBC
The government is to review whether "core British values" should become a compulsory part of the curriculum for all 11 to 16-year-olds in England.

In response to last year's London bombings, ministers want to adapt the current citizenship classes in an attempt to make society more unified.

But critics say the definition of British values is too vague and education cannot prevent extremism.

A second review, of the teaching of Islam in universities, is also planned. British values classes considered
Mark Alexander
British Muslims can't find their feet


Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting
Photo courtesy of BBC
Many Muslims in England face bleak employment prospects and endure poor standards of housing, a government-backed study has found.

The report revealed Muslims are more likely than any other faith group to be jobless and living in poor conditions.

It said half of Muslims aged over 25 are unemployed and one in three live in the most deprived areas of England. Muslim hardship under spotlight
Mark Alexander

Sunday, May 14, 2006

Bush se défend


Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting
Photo grâce à Figaro
Les différents programmes de surveillance intérieure ne remettent pas en cause les libertés civiles des Américains et servent à les protéger des attaques terroristes. C’est en substance ce qu’a déclaré samedi le président des Etats-Unis lors de son allocution radio hebdomadaire. Surveillance électronique : Bush se défend
Mark Alexander