Showing posts with label US-Saudi relations. Show all posts
Showing posts with label US-Saudi relations. Show all posts
Wednesday, June 07, 2023
US-Saudi Relations: Secretary of State Meets Saudi Crown Prince
Labels:
Antony Blinken,
MbS,
US-Saudi relations
Saturday, August 08, 2020
Is the US-Saudi Arabia Relationship Falling Apart? | Inside Story
In a rare rebuke, the State Department praised Jabri and demanded answers about the safety of his children.
Will President Donald Trump, a staunch supporter for Bin Salman, be forced to take action?
Presenter: Adrian Finighan; Guests: Khalil Jahshan - Executive Director, Arab Center Washington DC; Mahjoob Zweiri - Director, Gulf Studies Center, Qatar University; Rami Khouri - Senior Fellow, Issam Fares Institute, American University of Beirut
Thursday, December 19, 2019
NAS Pensacola Tragedy Raises Questions Over Cozy US/Saudi Relationship
Labels:
US-Saudi relations
Saturday, August 10, 2019
New Documents Reveal Blurred Lines with US & Saudi Arabia Relationship
Friday, March 08, 2019
Andrew Bacevich: The US-Saudi Relationship Is a Principal Source of Instability in the Middle East
Tuesday, February 19, 2019
Bernie Sanders: End US Arms Sales to Saudis and Support for its Yemen War
Friday, October 19, 2018
Will Jamal Khashoggi's Disappearance Impact US-Saudi Relations? I Inside Story
More than two weeks after Jamal Khashoggi disappeared, his fate remains unclear; but US President Donald Trump has admitted, for the first time, the journalist may have been killed inside the Saudi consulate in Istanbul.
Trump's comments, are a shift for the White House, and he's warning of 'severe' consequences if the Saudi leadership is involved. The shift in tone comes following his Secretary of State Mike Pompeo's visit to Riyadh and Ankara earlier this week.
The president is now under mounting pressure to take action. Members of the House of Representatives have sent him a letter calling for sanctions against Saudi Arabia; so, how will this case impact the long-standing relationship between Washington and Riyadh?
Presenter: Imran Kahn | Guests: Kenneth Roth - Executive Director of Human Rights Watch; Galip Dalay - Research Director of Al Sharq Forum; Georges Malbrunot - Middle East Reporter at Le Figaro.
Paul Jay on the US-Saudi ‘Special Relationship’
Sunday, March 25, 2018
What’s Next in US-Saudi Relations
Sunday, May 21, 2017
Tillerson: Today Is Historic for US-Saudi Arabia Relations
Saturday, October 26, 2013
Inside Story: Trouble in US-Saudi Relations?
Thursday, October 24, 2013
A Widening Gulf
THE DAILY TELEGRAPH: It is to be hoped that the US and Saudi Arabia patch up their differences soon
Throughout Saudi Arabia’s long alliance with the West, one principle above all has governed its diplomacy: to keep any disagreements firmly behind closed doors. So the very public quarrel this week between Riyadh and Washington, which has seen the Saudis reject a rotating place on the United Nations Security Council, scale back cooperation with the CIA over Syria, and pledge to seek alternative weapons suppliers to the United States, is both unprecedented and extraordinarily important.
For many, the fact that Barack Obama’s administration has upset the House of Saud – despite protestations of enduring friendship from John Kerry, the Secretary of State – will be entirely welcome. The Saudis’ wealth and strategic importance have long bought them immunity from the criticism that their record of fomenting Islamist extremism and denying women’s rights might otherwise have incurred. With the shale revolution ensuring that America is no longer dependent on the Middle East for its oil, and a more pacific president (in every sense) in the White House, it is surely only natural that some distance appears. This was always, after all, an alliance based on self-interest rather than any real kinship. Read on and comment » | Telegraph View | Wednesday, October 23, 2013
Throughout Saudi Arabia’s long alliance with the West, one principle above all has governed its diplomacy: to keep any disagreements firmly behind closed doors. So the very public quarrel this week between Riyadh and Washington, which has seen the Saudis reject a rotating place on the United Nations Security Council, scale back cooperation with the CIA over Syria, and pledge to seek alternative weapons suppliers to the United States, is both unprecedented and extraordinarily important.
For many, the fact that Barack Obama’s administration has upset the House of Saud – despite protestations of enduring friendship from John Kerry, the Secretary of State – will be entirely welcome. The Saudis’ wealth and strategic importance have long bought them immunity from the criticism that their record of fomenting Islamist extremism and denying women’s rights might otherwise have incurred. With the shale revolution ensuring that America is no longer dependent on the Middle East for its oil, and a more pacific president (in every sense) in the White House, it is surely only natural that some distance appears. This was always, after all, an alliance based on self-interest rather than any real kinship. Read on and comment » | Telegraph View | Wednesday, October 23, 2013
Wednesday, October 23, 2013
Saudi Arabia Needs the Protection of the US
The alliance between the world’s most powerful democracy and a feudal theocracy seems implausible but the US-Saudi alliance has been one of the last remaining post Second World War constants in the Middle East. The US provided Saudi security cover; while Saudi Arabia ensured the free flow of oil boosting production at times of crises.
There have been rifts – the 1973 Arab oil embargo, the refusal of the US to sell arms to Saudi in the 1980s due to Israeli objections and the fall out over the role of Saudi hijackers in the 9/11 bombings. US support for Israel always irked the Saudis, whilst Saudi human rights abuses and treatment of women was always an embarrassment for Washington. Despite all this, the relationship never reached the nadir that it has now. Has it reached its sell by date?
For a state that prefers private diplomacy, Saudi public outbursts attract attention. Saudi’s refusal to take up a seat at the UN Security Council and open rebuke of the Obama administration are meant to be noticed. The Saudi leadership expects to be listened to, to be party to major decisions, but it has felt excluded.
Saudi officials say that the Americans are ignoring all their allies and cosying up to their enemies, notably Iran. On every issue that matters to Riyadh, the US has, in their eyes, let them down. (They conveniently forget Washington’s silence over the Saudi intervention in Bahrain). » | Chris Doyle * | Wednesday, October 23, 2013
* Chris Doyle is director of the Council for Arab-British Understanding
Saudi Arabia in Diplomatic Shift Away from Old Ally US
THE DAILY TELEGRAPH: A bitter diplomatic row between US and Saudi Arabia has burst into the open in a development that could threaten one of the Middle East’s core alliances and Washington’s leadership in the region
The public rupture saw the head of Saudi intelligence declare that the kingdom was “scaling back” co-operation with the CIA over arming and training Syrian rebels and seeking alternate weapons suppliers to the United States.
The unprecedented rebuke by Prince Bandar Bin Sultan al-Saud came after Saudi Arabia stunned diplomats by rejecting a prized seat on the UN Security Council.
The decision to reject the seat, Prince Bandar reportedly told diplomats, was intended as “a message for the US” about Saudi frustration with the Obama administration’s long-running failure to arm rebels in Syria and the rising prospect of a nuclear deal that would favour Riyadh’s arch-foe, Iran.
John Kerry, the US Secretary of State, yesterday confirmed that he had been forced to defend US policy at lengthy meetings with Prince Saud Al-Faisal, the Saudi foreign minister, in Paris. » | Peter Foster, in Washington, Ruth Sherlock in Beirut and Alex Spillius | Tuesday, October 22, 2013
Verwandt »
The public rupture saw the head of Saudi intelligence declare that the kingdom was “scaling back” co-operation with the CIA over arming and training Syrian rebels and seeking alternate weapons suppliers to the United States.
The unprecedented rebuke by Prince Bandar Bin Sultan al-Saud came after Saudi Arabia stunned diplomats by rejecting a prized seat on the UN Security Council.
The decision to reject the seat, Prince Bandar reportedly told diplomats, was intended as “a message for the US” about Saudi frustration with the Obama administration’s long-running failure to arm rebels in Syria and the rising prospect of a nuclear deal that would favour Riyadh’s arch-foe, Iran.
John Kerry, the US Secretary of State, yesterday confirmed that he had been forced to defend US policy at lengthy meetings with Prince Saud Al-Faisal, the Saudi foreign minister, in Paris. » | Peter Foster, in Washington, Ruth Sherlock in Beirut and Alex Spillius | Tuesday, October 22, 2013
Verwandt »
Wednesday, April 13, 2011
NPR: The Obama administration is sending another official to Saudi Arabia to try to smooth over relations damaged by the so-called Arab Spring. The Saudis think the U.S. is being naive about the democracy movements and canceled recent plans for Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to visit. They hosted, but only briefly, Defense Secretary Robert Gates last week, and this week it is National Security Adviser Tom Donilon's turn. Analysts say it will be difficult for the U.S. to support democracy in the Middle East and keep this strategic alliance on track. Read the transcript » | Michele Kelemen | Tuesday, April 12, 2011
Friday, March 25, 2011
THE MIAMI HERALD: WASHINGTON — The United States and Saudi Arabia — whose conflicted relationship has survived oil shocks, the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks and the U.S. invasion of Iraq — are drifting apart faster than at any time in recent history, according to diplomats, analysts and former U.S. officials.
The breach, punctuated by a series of tense diplomatic incidents in the past two weeks, could have profound implications for the U.S. role in the Middle East, even as President Barack Obama juggles major Arab upheavals from Libya to Yemen.
The Saudi monarchy, which itself has been loathe to introduce democratic reforms, watched with deepening alarm as the White House backed Arab opposition movements and helped nudge from power former Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak, another long-time U.S. ally, according to U.S. and Arab officials.
That alarm turned to horror when the Obama administration demanded that the Saudi-backed monarchy of Bahrain negotiate with protesters representing the country's majority Shiite Muslim population. To Saudi Arabia's Sunni rulers, Bahrain's Shiites are a proxy for Shiite Iran, its historic adversary.
"We're not going to budge. We're not going to accept a Shiite government in Bahrain," said an Arab diplomat, who spoke frankly on condition he not be further identified.
Saudi Arabia has registered its displeasure bluntly. Both Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Defense Secretary Robert Gates were rebuffed when they sought to visit the kingdom this month. The official cover story was that aging King Abdullah was too ill to receive them.
Ignoring U.S. pleas for restraint, a Saudi-led military force from the Gulf Cooperation Council, a grouping of six Arab Persian Gulf states, entered Bahrain on March 14, helping its rulers squelch pro-democracy protests, at least for now.
A White House statement issued the day before enraged the Saudis and Bahrainis further, the diplomat and others with knowledge of the situation said. The statement urged "our GCC partners to show restraint and respect the rights of the people of Bahrain, and to act in a way that supports dialogue instead of undermining it."
In a speech Sunday in the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Prince Turki al-Faisal, a former ambassador to Washington, said the Gulf countries now must look after their own security — a role played exclusively by the United States since the 1979 fall of the Shah of Iran. Continue reading and comment » | Warren P. Strobel | McClatchy Newspapers | Thursday, March 24, 2011
Labels:
US-Saudi relations
Tuesday, June 01, 2010
SAUDI GAZETTE: JEDDAH – Saudi Arabia and US were cooperating closely on security, and both shared a deep concern about militant activities in Yemen, said US Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano here Monday.
“The security coordination is very strong with Saudi Arabia,” she said after meetings with King Abdullah, Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques, and senior officials.
“We all share a concern about terrorist activity emanating from Yemen,” Napolitano said.
Speaking at the Jeddah Chamber of Commerce and Industry (JCCI) Napolitano said that she met Saudi officials to discuss security issues and US visas for Saudi students, but that she did not discuss terror financing. >>> Jassim Alghamdi | Tuesday, June 01, 2010
Saturday, July 28, 2007
THE GUARDIAN:
· Claims royal family is financing Sunni groups
The extent of the deterioration in US-Saudi relations was exposed for the first time yesterday when Washington accused Riyadh of working to undermine the Iraqi government.
The Bush administration warned Saudi Arabia, until this year one of its closest allies, to stop undermining the Iraqi prime minister, Nouri al-Maliki.
The US secretary of state, Condoleezza Rice, and the defence secretary, Robert Gates, are scheduled to visit Jeddah next week.
Reflecting the deteriorating relationship, the US made public claims that the Saudis have been distributing fake documents lying about Mr Maliki.
The Bush administration, as well as the British government, is telling the Saudis, so far without success, that establishing a stable government in Iraq is in their interest and that they stand to suffer if it collapses.
Relations have been strained since King Abdullah unexpectedly criticised the US, describing the Iraq invasion as "an illegal foreign occupation".
That was the first sign of a rift between the two, who have enjoyed a solid relationship for decades, based on Saudi's vast oil reserves. US accuses Saudis of telling lies about Iraq (more) By Ewen MacAskill in Washington
Mark Alexander
Labels:
US-Saudi relations
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)