Showing posts with label La maja desnuda. Show all posts
Showing posts with label La maja desnuda. Show all posts

Thursday, March 26, 2009

It’s Coming to Something …

It’s coming to something that in this PC, multicultural world that even a work of art, La maja desnuda, painted by Francisco Goya, circa 1797-1800, (oil on canvas), which is displayed in the Museo del Prado (Museo Nacional del Prado) in Madrid, violates Photobucket’s ‘terms of use’.

It seems to me that everyone is becoming a tad too sensitive. It is a healthy part of Western civilization that we all learn to appreciate wonderful works of art. That includes nudity! Is this a narrow-minded American thing, I wonder? Don’t Americans appreciate art? Or is this a broader, more sinister development?

All I can say is this: It is high time that people grew up! – ©Mark

The Dawning of a New Dark Age (Paperback & Hardback) – Free delivery >>>
UK Recession: Mistresses Are the Credit Crunch's Latest Victims

Photobucket
La maja desnuda. (Francisco Goya, 1800-1805, Oil on canvas, Museo del Prado, Madrid.) Courtesy of Google Images
Full nakedness! All joys are due to thee; 
As souls unbodied, bodies unclothed must be 
To taste whole joys. Gems which you women use
 Are like Atlanta’s ball cast in men’s views; 
That, when a fool’s eye lighteth on a gem, 
His earthly soul might court that, not them. 
Like pictures, or like books’ gay coverings made 
For laymen, are all women thus array’d.
 Themselves are only mystic books, which we
 - Whom their imputed grace will dignify - 
Must see reveal’d. – Elegy XX. 'To His Mistress Going to Bed' by John Donne
THE TELEGRAPH: Mistresses have become an unnecessary expense during the recession.

'When a man marries his mistress," the late Sir James Goldsmith famously said, "he creates a vacancy." In today's economic climate, that "vacancy" looks increasingly likely to remain unfilled.

As men, fearful for their jobs and marriages, seek to cut back on their assets and expenditures, mistresses are facing a cull. A recent survey reports that nearly half of analysts, stockbrokers and hedge-fund managers are preparing to let the other woman go. There's no doubt about it: these are bad times for the good time girls.

"Like luxury cars, mistresses require a lot of time and money to be spent on them," says Josh Spero, senior editor of Spear's Wealth Management Survey, "so when it comes to wealthy men cutting back, the other woman is near the top of their list."

Although modern mistresses may differ from their historical counterparts – in the past, royal mistresses of European monarchs such as Nell Gwynne and Madame de Pompadour were not simply kept women but figures of immense influence – the fragrant breed exists in a variety of forms. "It may be a far cry from 18th and 19th-century France," says Oliver James, the psychologist, "but there are different types of mistresses around today, including the 'other women' who describe themselves as 'mistresses' without feeling there are any negative connotations attached."

Should these credit crunch squeezes survive the cull, their prospects (as for so many in the private sector) will be humbler. In America, where the recession is more deeply entrenched, newly parsimonious guidelines are already being established by prolific adulterers: according to a recent survey by Prince and Associates, a market research firm specialising in private wealth, more than 80 per cent of multi-millionaires who had extra-marital lovers are cutting back on their gifts and allowances.

"Rich people are getting hit, and they're all expressing the need to curtail unnecessary spending," said Russ Alan Prince, the firm's president. "Lovers are part of the same calculation." >>> By Celia Walden | Thursday, March 26, 2009