Thursday, January 12, 2023

The Guardian View on Anti-strike Laws: Bad in Practice, Wrong in Principle

THE GUARDIAN – EDITORIAL: Attacking fundamental labour rights is a sign of weakness in a prime minister without a strategy

Rishi Sunak ‘has failed to negotiate, or even engage with the strikers’ arguments’. Photograph: Zuma Press, Inc./Alamy Stock Photo/Alamy Live News.

No reasonable inquiry into the cause of Britain’s present political and economic difficulties would point the finger at trade union power. Industrial action is an issue now because of grievances amassed over many years. To respond, as the government intends, with legal curtailment of the right to strike is a misdiagnosis of the problem and an opportunistic assault on fundamental rights.

The proposed bill would give the business secretary, Grant Shapps, powers to define “minimum service levels” in certain sectors – health, fire and rescue, education, border control, transport and nuclear safety. Workers would be required to maintain that level during a strike or forfeit employment rights, including legal protection against unfair dismissal. Employers would issue “work notices” enforcing the minimum service level, and unions would be liable to legal action if they abetted breach of those notices. » | Editorial | Wednesday, January 11, 2023

‘Civilised European nations’ sack striking workers, do they, Grant Shapps? What nonsense: The business secretary is trying to warp reality as part of the Tories’ culture war against NHS staff »