Here is the problem in a nutshell. The Marxist left has this insane notion that the third world is its current Noble savage. Thus it sees no evil in practices that are clearly evil.
Poll taxes and oppressive police states with rampant human rights abuses are the norm in Muslim countries. Yet the PC left rails at indigenous people Jews for having the nerve to build a state on land to which they and not Arabs are indigenous upon.
The notion that Islamocolonialism or JihadoJimCrowe were realities long before the western versions is just a minor detail. The notion that poverty or third worldism is a virtue is an insane fantasy of the left.
The most insane man on the left is a gay Dane in London who calls himself 167. The notion of a gay man praising Iranian and Saudi executions of gays as just while railing about the racist execution of Tookie Williams is an example of how insane the far left has become.
In order to take back the UK the people will have to deal with the far left first. One can not point the finger at Muslims alone. The Marxist left has enabled the Muslim radicals to void the implied social contract of immigrants.
The social contact is simple.
1 Come legally 2 Stay employed 3 Respect the laws of the host country. 4 Leave your bigotries behind and respect others. 5 Learn the language
Does this social contract seem unreasonable? It worked for generations but only the advocates of Marx who fail everywhere get to reinvent the wheel and fail.
A puff piece, pure and simple. A new age journalist, displaying all her objective credentials, but totally unable to hide her true bias. The only comment she left out was that we, that is, you and I and most of the people who comment here, are the true representatives of the bad guys. Our concern is simply unacceptable to both the great and the good, and to the muslim community, who are an enemy, but with the deniability granted to them by a foolish government and an even more stupid media, (unless of course they have been bought and are therefore an active arm of our enemy).
The only way that that journalist will see the folly of her position, will be the day that the Islamic boot finally comes down upon her head. Though, upon thinking about it, the reporter herself is probably a muslim, judging by the tone and total lack of real objectivism
She prattles on about all this so called debate within the Islamic community, about these tyrannical backlashes which have somehow morfed from "maybe about to happen" in the future, to having "already decended" upon their poor wittle heads, times too numerous to mention, oblivious to the fact that that whole debate is about how muslims can respond to events to advance themselves at the expense of the rights of everyone else. There is no discussion on how they themselves can become better citizens, for they simply do not want to be; the discussion is always about what's in it for them, how can they turn things to their advanatage.
When she got to the bit about George Galloway and the Respect Party, that for me said it all. Are we to follow the rantings of an opportunistic loon just to appease the nihilism of a group of religious nutcases who are an anathema to everything our society stands for and aspires too.
The only part that I agreed with was the comment regarding the political activity of the muslim community, they are that, and as such they do present a danger to the fabric of our societies. The shame of it is that they are confronted by such weak and feeble minds as that presently infest the corridors of power. AS you say Mark, our politicians can't give our countries away fast enough.
Sadly I think that our own societies will only awake after Islam has made it's grab for power. Remember, it only takes a small but committed group to seize control, it has been done many times before. The only difference here is that the prevailing culture, for all its failings and irresolution, will not take kindly to having Islamic sensibilities rammed down its throat; but then again, it does not seem too concerned with the slow creeping approach which is being foisted upon us right now.
4 comments:
Mark
Here is the problem in a nutshell. The Marxist left has this insane notion that the third world is its current Noble savage. Thus it sees no evil in practices that are clearly evil.
Poll taxes and oppressive police states with rampant human rights abuses are the norm in Muslim countries. Yet the PC left rails at indigenous people Jews for having the nerve to build a state on land to which they and not Arabs are indigenous upon.
The notion that Islamocolonialism or JihadoJimCrowe were realities long before the western versions is just a minor detail. The notion that poverty or third worldism is a virtue is an insane fantasy of the left.
The most insane man on the left is a gay Dane in London who calls himself 167. The notion of a gay man praising Iranian and Saudi executions of gays as just while railing about the racist execution
of Tookie Williams is an example of how insane the far left has become.
In order to take back the UK the people will have to deal with the far left first. One can not point the finger at Muslims alone. The Marxist left has enabled the Muslim radicals to void the implied social contract of immigrants.
The social contact is simple.
1 Come legally
2 Stay employed
3 Respect the laws of the host country.
4 Leave your bigotries behind and respect others.
5 Learn the language
Does this social contract seem unreasonable? It worked for generations but only the advocates of Marx who fail everywhere get to reinvent the wheel and fail.
A puff piece, pure and simple. A new age journalist, displaying all her objective credentials, but totally unable to hide her true bias. The only comment she left out was that we, that is, you and I and most of the people who comment here, are the true representatives of the bad guys. Our concern is simply unacceptable to both the great and the good, and to the muslim community, who are an enemy, but with the deniability granted to them by a foolish government and an even more stupid media, (unless of course they have been bought and are therefore an active arm of our enemy).
The only way that that journalist will see the folly of her position, will be the day that the Islamic boot finally comes down upon her head. Though, upon thinking about it, the reporter herself is probably a muslim, judging by the tone and total lack of real objectivism
She prattles on about all this so called debate within the Islamic community, about these tyrannical backlashes which have somehow morfed from "maybe about to happen" in the future, to having "already decended" upon their poor wittle heads, times too numerous to mention, oblivious to the fact that that whole debate is about how muslims can respond to events to advance themselves at the expense of the rights of everyone else. There is no discussion on how they themselves can become better citizens, for they simply do not want to be; the discussion is always about what's in it for them, how can they turn things to their advanatage.
When she got to the bit about George Galloway and the Respect Party, that for me said it all. Are we to follow the rantings of an opportunistic loon just to appease the nihilism of a group of religious nutcases who are an anathema to everything our society stands for and aspires too.
The only part that I agreed with was the comment regarding the political activity of the muslim community, they are that, and as such they do present a danger to the fabric of our societies. The shame of it is that they are confronted by such weak and feeble minds as that presently infest the corridors of power. AS you say Mark, our politicians can't give our countries away fast enough.
Sadly I think that our own societies will only awake after Islam has made it's grab for power. Remember, it only takes a small but committed group to seize control, it has been done many times before. The only difference here is that the prevailing culture, for all its failings and irresolution, will not take kindly to having Islamic sensibilities rammed down its throat; but then again, it does not seem too concerned with the slow creeping approach which is being foisted upon us right now.
Beakerkin:
The social contact is simple.
1 Come legally
2 Stay employed
3 Respect the laws of the host country.
4 Leave your bigotries behind and respect others.
5 Learn the language
Does this social contract seem unreasonable?
This is eminently reasonable. But it's not put into practice anymore. Would that it were!
Just Another Richard:
A wonderful comment. One of your best ever! Bravo!
Post a Comment