Showing posts with label loss of freedom. Show all posts
Showing posts with label loss of freedom. Show all posts

Sunday, July 19, 2015

Newcastle University Academic Says Britain Has Become a Less Free, Less Private State Since 7/7


CHRONICLE LIVE: Response to London bombings has seen individual freedom sacrificed for security according to Newcastle University professor Dr Martin Farr

Since July 7 it can be argued that the streets of England are safer but at what cost?

Surveillance has been ramped up, individual privacy and liberties curtailed, controversial legislation proposed and in some cases followed through.

The depth of the scrutiny has been revealed by Wikileaks and CIA whistleblower Edward Snowden.

But while there is not been another 7/7 on British shores, the threat overseas is ever present as shown by the recent shootings in Tunisia when 30 British tourists were among 38 victims of gunman Seifeddine Rezgui.

Most legislation proposals are preceded by ominous warnings. » | Mike Kelly | Tuesday, July 7, 2015

Saturday, November 09, 2013

New Asbo Plans Are Assault on Basic Freedom, Says Former DPP Lord Macdonald

Christian preachers could be driven off the streets
THE DAILY TELEGRAPH: Plans to replace Asbos with wide ranging new orders clamping down on anything likely to cause "annoyance" amount to "gross state interference" with basic freedoms, Lord Macdonald warns

Christian preachers, buskers and peaceful protesters could effectively be driven off the streets under draconian new powers designed to clamp on anyone deemed “annoying”, according to a former Director of Public Prosecutions.

Lord Macdonald QC said Theresa May, the Home Secretary’s plans for a new civil injunctions to replace Anti-Social Behaviour Orders (Asbos) amount to “gross state interference” with people’s private lives and basic freedoms.

In a formal legal opinion being circulated to peers, he savages the proposals as opening the way for the outright “suppression” of anything deemed “potentially annoying” with only “vague” justification.

The proposed safeguards to prevent abuse of the new system are “shockingly” weak, he writes.

Under proposals currently before Parliament, Asbos are to be scrapped and replaced with wide-ranging new orders known as Ipnas (Injunctions to Prevent Nuisance and Annoyance). » | John Bingham, Social Affairs Editor | Friday, November 08, 2013