Dutch government has the courage to take the lead: The ridiculous burqah is to be banned!
Photo courtesy of the BBC
BBC: The Dutch cabinet has backed a proposal by the country's immigration minister to ban Muslim women from wearing the burqa in public places.
The burqa, a full body covering that also obscures the face, would be banned by law in the street, and in trains, schools, buses and the law courts.
The cabinet said burqas disturb public order, citizens and safety. Dutch government backs burqa ban
Burqa ban splits Holland
Mark Alexander
3 comments:
What is that? A breath of fresh air coming out of Europe? Hear, hear, stand up and cheer for the Netherlands! I certainly hope it passes. Quick EU/Europe--show some spine and pass a similar resolution(s). I hope this resolution will be echoed across all Western nations.
Did you see this
posted on the MEMRI site a few days ago? This is about the much less restrictive abaya. Here's an excerpt:
"... Because of her sympathy for Arabs and Muslims, Donna, an American woman, decided to wear an abaya in an attempt to see how it felt and how it influenced her behavior. She wanted to show sympathy to women wearing abayas, especially after various incidents against Muslims in the post-9/11 world. She wore an abaya and walked along one of the busiest streets in a major American city. She tried to be as normal as possible, talking to people, laughing and behaving as usual. She said that she never felt the abaya was restricting her or limiting her movements or her freedom.
"Among those who observed Donna, however, were some Muslims, Arabs, and even some Saudis. The Saudis were upset by what they saw and told Donna so. When she asked why, they explained that she was using the abaya in an invalid way. She then became curious to find out what they considered a valid way to use it. They explained to her that she must walk slowly, must look down when walking and keep her eyes more or less in front of her - no glancing from side to side, in other words. She must not talk to anyone or laugh loudly and certainly must not address any remarks to anyone lest they misunderstand her purpose in doing so.
"To say the least, Donna was astounded by their remarks and realized that they were not simply talking about a garment to be worn but about their perceptions of what an abaya symbolized. They seemed determined to deny that a normal human being was under the black material. The truth is that those Saudi men articulated something that the Saudi lifestyle and customs have created. The abaya indeed covers a typically weak and frightened character (a woman of course), who views herself as a sexual entity confined in a well-defined space she can never escape from. This is why the whole culture of the abaya imposes so many restraints upon women. One of the restraints is that she must walk as if her feet were hobbled and she was unable to move easily and normally. Nor is she allowed to look around and observe the surrounding world comfortably, as slowly or quickly as she might like. The abaya has also contributed directly to preventing certain basic movements; for example, she can no longer move her hands normally. Aside from that, ordinary free conversation is forbidden and is replaced with low and often unclear speech that makes little sense."
BRAVO BRAVO BRAVO for the Dutch Government! It is so uplifting to know that there are at least a few politicians in the West with enough integrity, intelligence and courage to do what needs to be done to thwart the advance of barbaric, bedouin, backward religion into the modern civilized world.
Scary Sexy Chocolate Thing:
I am sorry, but for some inexplicable reason, I have been unable to publish your comment on this thread, despite repeated attempts to do so. A Blogger glitch, no doubt.
Hence, I am going to do it this way:
Scary Sexy Chocolate Thing said:
in addition to what Heather said:
Women living under the "religion of peace", must have 4 male witnesses to establish being raped. Otherwise when there is less than 4 male witnesses she is considered an adulteress and subject to the penalty of being stoned to death.
The adherents of the "religion of peace" surely must be joking when they think i don't see them as dangerous to my 3 year old daughter!
Mark: i found out that Barnes and Nobles does carry your book as well as the ladies book Now They Call Me Infidel. I am going to purchase both today or tommorrow.
signed
scary sexy chocolate thing
Post a Comment