Saturday, March 04, 2006

Our democratic leaders are failing us!

9/11 was a turning point for the West. The US was attacked, but we have all been affected. This attack changed the nature of our democracies. Ever since, democracy the West over has started to weaken. Not only are our leaders doing nothing to arrest this weakening of democracy at home, but they are, indeed, helping it along, sometimes out of ignorance, sometimes out of denial, but always out of fear!

The odd thing is this: While democracy is weakening at home, the US and the UK have embarked on a foreign policy to try and bring democracy to the Middle East! Make no mistake about it: This policy is destined to fail! Indeed, it is failing before our very eyes. Just take the mayhem in Iraq as a manifestation of this failure. Further, take Iran! There, instead of there being a softening of the régime in that theocratic land, there has been a hardening of their animosity to anything Western, to anything democratic, to anything we consider fair and balanced.

Then we have Syria. What is happening in Syria today is the very opposite of democratic. In that country, people are returning to their Islamic roots, even down to the way that women dress in public. Indeed, many Syrians are touting the idea that their future lies in Shariah law!

The knock-on effect of bringing democracy to Iraq is simply not happening. If anything, it would appear that our attempts to make the Middle East democratic have produced the opposite effect: Attitudes against anything Western, anything democratic, are hardening!

There are a few good reasons why this is so. First and foremost among them is this: Islam and democracy are totally at variance with each other. They are immiscible! Period! Unfortunately, no amount of political spin is going to change this harsh reality.

In Islam, as I have said so many times before, ALL power rests with Allah, and filters down; in a true democracy, ALL power is supposed to rest with the people and filter up. The reality of democracy, of course, is not quite as simple as that for, as we all know, the politicians who lead us so often refuse to listen to the wishes of the electorate after rising to high office. Take the example of Tony Blair taking the British to war against Iraq. Many people were against the idea; but Blair led us to war anyway.

Still, all that having been said, the notion that power in a democracy rests with the electorate still holds true, since even the ‘deafest’ of political leaders has to put himself and his party up for re-election. Pay-back time is never far away!

This is not true for Islam. Islam has never thrown up a true democracy in its almost 1400-year history save, perhaps, for the example of Turkey. But even there ‘democracy’ has had to be held together by the strong arm of the military!

The natural form of government for any country where Islam is the dominant religion is Islamic theocracy, not democracy, since Islam does not, and never will, recognize a separation of the political from the sacred, a separation of mosque and state. Indeed, such a separation is anathema to it! But such a separation is the sine qua non of democracy!

There are many other reasons why the attempt to bring democracy to the Middle East is destined to fail, too. For a democracy to function correctly, the electorate has to be well-educated, and through that sound education, the electorate is supposed to become well-informed in order to make good, solid, sound political judgements. But to be well-informed, it is essential that the electorate be allowed free access to information. Information must not be controlled by government!

The Middle East fails on both these counts. In the Middle East, the level of education is wanting, to say the least. In fact, the rates for illiteracy there are very high indeed. Illiteracy and democracy make very strange bedfellows! How can someone be well-informed if he is illiterate? If a person is not well-informed, then he is not ready to make a well-informed decision at the polls! Moreover, in the Middle East, the people are often denied access to the greatest and most powerful tool for access to information: The Internet.

There are other reasons why it was folly to try and bring democracy to the Middle East; but the reasons already given will suffice for now for the sake of argument.

It is interesting, but very disturbing, to note that whilst the US and the UK have busied themselves trying to bring democracy to the Middle East, they have also been busy trying to curtail our freedoms in our homelands!

Prime Minister Tony Blair, probably more than anyone who held the position in my lifetime, has passed so much legislation banning this, that and the other that he has seriously dented the freedoms of the British. He wants even to curtail freedom of speech and expression to make it a criminal offence to criticize Islam and the prophet of Islam, Muhammad!

Naturally, the reason why he is attempting to pass such a bill is to appease the growing Muslim vote within the UK. In recent years, they have become disaffected because of his insistence on war in Iraq!

It is ironic, isn’t it, that we should be losing our democracy at home at the very time as we are trying to establish their democracy?

As I see it, the story of Western politics ever since 9/11 is a story of failure! Even in the recent response to the fiasco caused by the publication of the cartoons of the prophet, there are signs aplenty that Westerners are losing one of their cherished freedoms: Freedom of expression. Why? Because our Western ‘leaders’ – American, British, European, Australasian - have failed to stand together against the tyranny of Islam. They have failed to re-affirm their commitment to liberty, failed to re-affirm their commitment to freedom of expression, failed to re-affirm the West’s commitment to the very values which underpin our civilization. Dear readers, make no mistake about this: Our leaders have failed us!

But there is one failure which endangers our democracy and our liberty even more. It is should be plain to see. Indeed, it should be as plain as the noses on our faces. Our politicians, with but few exceptions, have failed to see this too, however. …

9/11 was an attack not just on the Americans, but it was an attack on the West in its entirety. President George W Bush’s response to this attack was pathetically weak and appeasing. The day after 9/11, he appeared on TV to make an announcement to the Americans and the world. In front of him was a copy of the Qur’an – a book which had hitherto made no significant contribution either to the US in particular nor to the West in general - along with the Torah and the Bible. He stated that America was not at war with Islam or Muslims, insisting that Muslims were the friends of Americans!

It was at this point that the Neo-Conservative idea of bringing democracy to the Middle East was truly conceived. The great pity is that it didn’t produce a still birth!

The President’s response to 9/11 was weak and appeasing and flawed and destined to fail! Why? The main reason is that he failed to define the enemy. The enemy, of course, is Islam itself. The President tried to say that Al-Qaïda had taken a perfectly good religion – indeed, he called it a ‘religion of love and peace’! – and had twisted it, and had warped it into a religion of hatred.

His whole performance was so flawed, so very flawed. To start with, he showed that he had absolutely no understanding of Islam, no understanding of what motivates Muslims, and no knowledge of what the Qur’an says very clearly about us infidels. No, Mr President! No! Muslims are not our friends! They say so! Indeed, it says so in the Qur’an itself, the book that Muslims hold so dear! And NO again, Mr President! Al-Qaïda has not bastardized the message of Islam. On the contrary, Al-Qaïda takes the message of the Prophet Muhammad and the message of the Qur’an very seriously indeed. Al-Qaïda’s message is the true message of Islam. You had better believe it, Mr President! You, too, Mr Bair! Islam must be recognized for what it is: It is a competing civilization to Western civilization, competing in all respects!

What the President should have said that day is this: We were at war neither with Islam nor with Muslims. That would have been true. But he should have gone on to say that it is abundantly clear the Islam and Muslims are at war with America, and by extension the West. That would also have been true. If he had done this, he would surely have been able to galvanize the West in its entirety, for it was plain to see that 9/11 was not just an attack on America, but an attack on liberal democracy. If he had done this, he would have unified the West at a stroke! Furthermore, he would have displayed true leadership.

All further policies should have stemmed from the simple fact that Islam was at war with the West.

Very unfortunately, this was not done; so the ridiculous concept of ‘Islamism’ was born – an idea conceived to let Muslims off the hook, and to let our leaders off the hook, too. This way, they could start to wage their ‘War on Terror’. This war is one which is destined to go on and on and on. The terror they refer to is actually the Jihad in action. The jihad, or holy war, is the tool used by Muslims worldwide to bring Islam to the rest of what Muslims consider the ‘chaotic, jahiliyyic, un-Islamized regions of the world. We should note, and with urgency, that the jihad in history has been employed with great success wherever it has been waged.

Our leaders steadfastly refuse to accept this simple fact. Mssrs Bush and Blair, please start listening to the people, and please, please, please grow a spine! Accept the inevitable, accept what will sometime have to be accepted if the West is to survive, namely that the Islamic world is at war with the West and all its values. You cannot, you simply cannot, duck out of this one, for to do so is a dereliction of your duties. Your first duty is to protect the very system that brought you into office – democracy; and in doing so, protect the people who entrusted you with the power you have over them. Till now, you have failed your electorates! Till now, you have failed to identify the enemy! Till now, you have therefore failed to do anything meaningful to stop the jihad, to stop the Islamization of the West!

You are failing to protect democracy! You are therefore failing the people!

©Mark Alexander

25 comments:

Always On Watch said...

There is much on which to comment in this article, but in this particular comment, I'll start with this part:

The knock-on effect of bringing democracy to Iraq is simply not happening. If anything, it would appear that our attempts to make the Middle East democratic have produced the opposite effect...

Exactly what happened when Hamas got elected to power. The democratic voting-process there is a perfect example of how the hordes of Muslims will vote.

And let us not forget the the Constitution of Iraq provides for shari'a law. Yet, our politicians spin that and say, "Okay. Your version of democracy." Well, another version of democracy is fine by me, but not when that version advocates destroying any civilization which is not Islamic. And that idea of Islamic dominance is inherent in Islam.

I'm convinced that Bush believes that Islamism, "radical Islam," is the problem. I'm also intuitively convinced that in the few minutes after 9/11, he didn't believe so, but rather believed that Islam is the problem. In fact, I've read some of his statements about how he believes he was brought to office, as a Christian leader, to combat the evil.

So who or what got to him? Grover Norquist? David Forte? Charismatic Muslims (one of whom is now in prison for money-laundering money to terrorist organizations)? The minister of Bush's church? His Yale education?

I can speculate all day long, but the fact is that GWB believes that ALL religions are inherently good, as was stated to me this week in a letter from the White House. And as far as I can tell, so believe most of our leaders.

loki said...

Excellent piece!!!
Compeling and so right on the money!!!!!

Mark said...

Loki:

Thanks. I appreciate your comments.

Mark said...

Always,

...I can speculate all day long, but the fact is that GWB believes that ALL religions are inherently good,...

Well that's where GWB is wrong! Islam proves the point.

leelion said...

Good piece Mark. I just received a copy of a libertarian magazine called "the free radical" pubished in NZ. The front page says "death to islam!" with the "behead those who insult Islam" placard photos. Here is the front cover blurb:

"In the name of humanity, Islam must be put to death. Not by nuking, but by shaming. Not by the sword (though we will if they leave us no alternative) but by the word. Human beings worthy of the title must rise up and shout in irresistible unison "enough of this primorial primitivism! We who are civilized are revolted by it and shall rebuff it at every turn!"
Muslims must discover rationality and decency; Westerners must rediscover them, and, as a matter of urgency, speak up for them! All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for cowards to appease it - and Islam is the locus of evil in the contemporary world.

cybercrusader said...

Heloise, For many years, I held to the mistaken belief that our politicians were ordinary morons. Recently I have come to the realization that since one needs an IQ of at least 50 to be categorized as a moron, our leaders simply don't make it and, indeed, are at best, submorons--or in other words, ordinary idiots!

Anonymous said...

Mark,

What do you think of this?

Saluting the 3rd ACR


Everything within me wants to believe that THIS type of thinking will prevail in Iraq and across the Middle East.

My motto is always hope for the best, yet prepare for the worst. Your blog has helped me do the latter.

You have such a gift for writing, it's always a pleasure to read your posts.

Mark said...

Leelion:

Thank you!

That blurb is very interesting. Are people beginning to wake up?

There is so much in that blurb I could comment on. But one thing is a little 'hopeful', I think. Islam should be killed off "by the word". I doubt that it is going to be that simple, or that bloodless! It's lasted almost 1400 years already, and hasn't been killed off yet. What makes us think that we can achieve that now, simply by the word?

I know we've got the Internet; but still. You have seen for yourself what fanatics they can be with the cartoon fiasco.

I hope they're right, of course; but I am sceptical.

Mark said...

Heloise:

Once again Mark your article is dead on and reflects what many of us think about our so called leaders who are nothing but hack politicos and their lack of knowledge, courage and spine.

Thank you for saying so. Be sure that I do appreciate it.

I like your term "hack politicos". That's very apt!

BTW, it's good to have you back with us.

Mark said...

US Iconoclastic Patriot:

Good point! :-)

Mark said...

Heather:

My motto is always hope for the best, yet prepare for the worst. Your blog has helped me do the latter.

God! Do I come over as such a pessimist? :-(

You have such a gift for writing, it's always a pleasure to read your posts.

Thank you so much for this wonderful compliment. You have made my weekend! In fact you have made the week ahead, too! :-)

Now for the more complicated stuff...

Everything within me wants to believe that THIS type of thinking will prevail in Iraq and across the Middle East.

We all want to believe the best, Heather. This is human nature. But sometimes, especially when in mortal danger, we have to think more pessimistically.

I, too, would like to believe that everything is going to work out well in Iraq. I also wish your President the very best with this venture. I'm on his side. But I am rather pessimistic about the strategy he is employing, for every fibre of my being tells me that this war is being waged wrongly, and has been waged wrongly ever since 9/11.

Maybe I'm wrong, I don't know. Only time will tell.

Now the 'article' about the 3rd Armored Cavalry Regiment...

I hope this is accurate. I really, really do. But I am sceptical about its authenticity!

Has this really been written by an Arab? I have yet to come across an Arab with such wonderful, grammatically-perfect English; and I taught them for years, even graduates.

Everything about this article reeks of a well-educated Westerner's words. So I have to ask a question - another pessimistic question!: Has this, perhaps, been written by an officer who has leaned on an Iraqi mayor (probably appointed by the Americans - a flunky) to sign a pre-written piece of propaganda?

That's what it seems like to me: A piece of moral-boosting propaganda!

I HOPE I'm wrong. Believe me, I do.

Please tell me what you think.

By the way, Heather, I would like to send you a very gruesome attachment which I received yesterday. It's very real, and paints a side of Islam which you might not like to admit to. But I think you should view it. It might even reduce you to tears. Even I could barely look at it.

I cannot send it to you yet since I do not have your email address. If you send it to me - if you will trust me with it - I would be only too pleased to share this with you.

Anonymous said...

Mark,
We agree about more than we disagree.

~the war strategy has been flawed from the outset, (I would add), thanks in large part to Donald Rumsfeld.
I'm sad to see that you think the letter is a fake, but you are not alone in that belief.

If you scroll down the page, you will see that the mayor is now quite bitter since these troops had to return home and new ones have taken their place.

I think the mayor is well-educated and don't understand why you think an Arab couldn't have written this.
Many of the Arab immigrants to the US hold graduate degrees and earn well above the average income.

I think most human beings long for freedom. There were record turn-outs for the Iraqi and Afghanistan elections. This at much risk to the people who voted.

I don't think anyone can fairly judge what a country will be like decades down the road from the initial struggle and chaos that it goes through at the outset.

The US is a good example. We have a great, not perfect, constitution. The writers understood this and wrote a way to amend the constitution. (27)

The bloodiest war the US has been in was fought on our own soil over the issue of freedom for people held as slaves.

Why do people expect instant success from Afghanistan or Iraq when they don't hold the same standards for their own countries?

I don't think the Middle East will ever have democracy as we know it in the west, but I do believe it is possible to have a much better system than under Saddam or the maniac from Iran. It really is up to the people in the countries to want freedom enough to fight for it.

Thought this might interest you:

Egyptian Intellectuals Speak Out Against the Muslim Brotherhood Movement and its Slogan


And, I will have to pass on the offer of the gruesome images you'd like to email me. I have a very weak stomach and don't think I could look at them without losing my lunch. Do you get a lot of this type of email?

Mark said...

Oops, Heather, that should have been 'morale-boosting'! Sorry!

Always On Watch said...

whilst the US and the UK have busied themselves trying to bring democracy to the Middle East, they have also been busy trying to curtail our freedoms in our homelands!

Isn't it just crazy?

Old saying: "Charity begins at home." Let me change that to "Protecting freedom begins at home."

Mark said...

Heather:

We agree about more than we disagree.

I'm awfully glad to learn that!

I'm sad to see that you think the letter is a fake, but you are not alone in that belief.

There are good reasons why I think that this letter MIGHT BE a fake. Two things spring immediately to mind: The use of English. This is something which is difficult to explain in a few words. But the style of that letter is not typically Arab. The nature of the Arabic language is very different from English. Their logic is concentric rather than linear, and their use of conjunctions is very different, too. The Arab speaks or writes in concentric circles, using 'and' (wa) as their main conjunction. For example: This is so AND that is so AND the other is so AND this is my conclusion. The English speaker, by comparison, writes something like this: This is so, and the other is so. SO this must be. THEREFORE that must be too. CONSEQUENTLY the answer MUST be this. Do you understand what I am driving at?

Moreover, I have NEVER heard an Arab say: 'In the Name of Allah the Compassionate AND Merciful'. Rather, he would say: In the Name of Allah, the Compassionate, THE Merciful. That, after all, is how it is written in the Qur'an.

I think the mayor is well-educated and don't understand why you think an Arab couldn't have written this.

I must explain myself here. It isn't that I don't think that an Arab could have written this. If we are talking about an Arab who lives in the States and who has been educated in the States, or anywhere else in the West for that matter, then I certainly think that an Arab could have written this. But that, as far as I can see is NOT what we are talking about.

We are talking about an Arab living in Iraq who would have learned English as a foreign language, not as a mother-tongue. As good as many students can be, it would be difficult for anyone from any country where English is not spoken and read daily, to write something as beautifully-written as this. That's what I am saying.

If you are telling me that an Arab who has lived and who has been educated here in the West has returned to Iraq to take up the position of mayor of the town, then such a person could well have written it. But as I understand things, that is NOT what we are talking about. What we seem to be talking about here is a man taken from the local community who has Arabic as a mother-tongue, and who has learnt English as a foreign language, writing this beautiful piece. That's why it seems so unbelievable to me.

I have taught Arabs English, and I know what level they can achieve, especially without leaving the country for a protracted period of time.

I cannot say with certainty that this man hasn't written this. All I can say is that it seems doubtful to me.

Add to this the fact that it is in the interests of American and British troops to convey a message of hope to the people back home, and I can see a different picture emerge from that which you can see, perhaps.

Many of the Arab immigrants to the US hold graduate degrees and earn well above the average income.

Yes, but we are not talking about Arab immigrants who live here on a day-to-day basis, having degrees and eraning well above average incomes, are we?

I think most human beings long for freedom.

Yes, I do agree. But we have to be careful of how we define 'freedom' here. 'Freedom', to a Westerner means something quite different from 'freedom' to an Arab Muslim! We must be careful of not using our own standards and values to judge another people. We mustn't superimpose our own standards on a totally different mindset. And that is what we seem to be doing.

Arab Muslims also want freedom. Often, though, they want freedom in order to choose Islam as their religion, and an Islamic theocracy as their political system! Witness how the Palestinians have recently voted Hamas into office! Witness, too, how the Iraqis are working towards Shariah law for their country.

In addition, it has to be said there is a loathing of all things western in the Arab world. Yes, they like to come to the West for a vacation to "sin" and enjoy the pornography and alcohol and casinos and things. In fact, all the things forbidden them back home. But don't, for goodness' sake, think they wish to bring these "awful" things back home to the Orient. You would be greatly mistaken for thinking so. They wish to keep their countries pure.

You see, Heather, it all depends on how we define the word 'freedom'. That's what Bush seems not to understand.

Yes, all human beings have basic needs. They all need to sleep, they all need to eat, they all need shelter, etc. But not all people need the freedoms we revere here in the West. Indeed, some of our freedoms in the West are abhorrent to Muslims!

I don't think anyone can fairly judge what a country will be like decades down the road from the initial struggle and chaos that it goes through at the outset.

I agree 100%!

The US is a good example. We have a great, not perfect, constitution. The writers understood this and wrote a way to amend the constitution. (27)

Yes, you do have a great constitution. But don't be surprised to see that the constitution the Iraqis will choose will be very different from the US one. Indeed, they already have! But I hasten to add that I do not think that Bush expected such an outcome from the outset. He thought that the Iraqis would choose freedom American-style.

Why should we waste our resourcces and wonderful soldiers to fight to bring them what they don't want and what they don't appreciate? Those resources could be better employed in the military in a different, more useful way.

Why do people expect instant success from Afghanistan or Iraq when they don't hold the same standards for their own countries?

I don't expect instant success. I really don't. I am sceptical not because things haven't happened sooner; rather, I am sceptical because I truly do not believe that Islam and democracy are miscible, compatible. Of that I am convinced.

I don't think the Middle East will ever have democracy as we know it in the west, but I do believe it is possible to have a much better system than under Saddam or the maniac from Iran.

No, I don't think so either. They may well have a better system than they had under Saddam. But that's not why we went there in the first place. We went there in the first place because we wanted to install a Western-style government there. But, alas, it's not coming off!

It's no good saying now (and wringing our hands): Oh well! Our objectives are NOT being achieved. They're not buying into a Western-style government. If we aren't careful, they'll end up with a theocracy not dissimilarfrom the theocracy in Iran!

Oh, and by the way: By removing Saddam, we have created a stronger Iran, ipso facto.

And, I will have to pass on the offer of the gruesome images you'd like to email me. I have a very weak stomach and don't think I could look at them without losing my lunch. Do you get a lot of this type of email?

It's a pity you have to pass on my offer. Still, you know best. I shall, however, describe it to you instead. There are six pictures in all. They show a dear little 8-year old boy from Iran who has stolen bread from the local market. As punishment, the adults stand around and place his arm on a blanket on the floor and get a vehicle to drive over his arm to crush it! I tell you that it is heart-rending! Heart-rending! This is the "religion of love and peace" that our leaders, including President Bush, so readily speak of. They are BARBARIANS and SAVAGES!!! I wouldn't treat a rat in that inhumane way. If only you could see that dear little boy's face, a face showing the agony he is suffering! THIS is the mentality of the people we are dealing with!

Thank you for the link. I shall view it shortly. I appreciate your sending it to me. You always have such wonderful links. I wonder where you find them all!

In answer to your question, by the way: No, I don't get sent that many gruesome links; though I do get some from time to time.

Anonymous said...

Mark,
My posts usually are full of typos/mispellings so don't worry about it.

I had a paragraph in there about the Revolutionary war, not sure what happened to it.

AOW,
I think that is so important, and the only way to protect our freedom is to fight each and every case where it is being infringed.

Fight each and every time our freedoms are taken away. I saw this link today on Moonbattery.

I'm happy to see the original author isn't backing down. I just hope others have/will come out in support. What she had to say is so true:

OSU Muslim Students Protest Barometer Letter

Anonymous said...

Mark,
I just saw your recent post. You did explain yourself very well. I now understand why you think it was not an original piece written by the mayor himself. Thanks for taking the time to explain it.

Would a translator be able to rewrite what he ( the mayor) actually wrote and remain true to the original intent/content of his letter?

I don't agree with you that Bush was so naive as to think he would bring a US/Western style democracy to the Middle East, but something along the lines of Egpyt or Turkey.

You did a very good job of describing what happened to the little Iranian boy. I have read of similar atrocities happening in that country. Words fail me when expressing my utter contempt for such barbarity.

Anonymous said...

AOW,
I forgot the link to the article in question. Written by a male, not female.

The Islamic double-standard


*I promise no more posts from me today. I'm off for a fun afternoon with my husband.

Mark said...

Heather:

Enjoy yourselves!

Anonymous said...

Good Evening/Early Morning Mark,

I would very much appreciate your response to my question about the translation of the letter by the mayor from Iraq.

It makes perfect sense to me that it would be translated from Arabic to English to be distributed to the English speaking world. I'd like your opinion. :>

Have you had a chance to read the article by MEMRI? It seems very encouraging to me--what do you think?

Mark said...

Heather:

I have only just printed out these articles to read. I shall read them as soon as I get a chance, in any event soon. Like you, I took a few hours off yesterday afternoon/evening in order to have a little fun! :-)

I'll get back to you with my comments as soon as I have read the articles.

Now, about that translation. I'm sorry, but I missed that question you posed.

Answer:

Of course it would be possible to translate it from Arabic into English. But stylistically it would probably be quite different. It would therefore, in all probability, have a to be what is termed a 'loose" translation. In other words, conveying the meaning of the text rather than being true to the actual words used and the syntax.

If this is the case, then it begs the question: How true is it to the original? AND: Has anything been added or deleted?

I sense that you want me to say that it is genuine. I cannot say that. However, I'm not saying it isn't, either. All I'm saying is that I have my doubts.

Mark said...

Heather;

Your links are most interesting (as always).

I have read them all. The article by Nathanael Blake is outstanding! Really outstanding!

You say you find what was written on MEMRI encouraging. Well, it is to a point. The problem is that there are all too few people speaking out in that way.

You know, Heather, the forces of darkness in Islam can be quite overwhelming. You can see this in places like Iran and Saudi Arabia,

Unfortunately, the whole thrust of the Islamic movement is backwards, not forwards!

Mark said...

It's interesting to read that you also think the letter might well be a fake, Mussolini.

Anonymous said...

This is one of the most heart-wrenching posts I've read about the situation in Iraq.

They have summed up what the people long for, and the harsh reality of what is happening around them. I cried for a long time when I read this.

Mortars were louder than reason in Baghdad today...

Mark said...

Heather:

Thanks for this. I have read the first part, but will have to read some of those comments as and when I get time. There are many to wade through.