Clouds Gather as ‘Sulky’ Musharraf Retreats to Bunker
THE GUARDIAN: In some ways life has changed little for Pakistan's president, Pervez Musharraf, since Monday's election. The retired general still trots out for afternoon tennis, aides say, and enjoys a game of bridge a few times a week. In the evenings he pulls on a cigar and, although he can't admit it, nurses a glass of whisky.

Visitors still call to see him at Army House, the marble-floored Rawalpindi residence of Pakistan's military chiefs, even though he retired three months ago. "It has been renamed Presidential Lodge," said spokesman Rashid Qureshi. "The normal routine is functioning."

But outside clouds are gathering. The spectacular rout of his Pakistan Muslim League (Q) party at the polls has shorn the retired commando of his political base, leaving him isolated and exposed.

"He's been sulking," said a senior party official. "He's retreated into a mental bunker, which is not healthy. He thinks everyone is out to get him and only listens to a small circle. It's a dangerous mindset to be in at this point in time. He could decide to hit back."

Musharraf's bad mood stems from the prospect of Nawaz Sharif, the rotund prime minister from Punjab he ousted in a 1999 coup and banished to Saudi Arabia a year later, returning to power. Sharif, who controls the second biggest party in parliament, the Pakistan Muslim League (N) has vowed to oust Musharraf at the earliest opportunity. "The nation has given its verdict. The sooner he accepts it the better," said Sharif.

But Musharraf, targeted at least twice by al-Qaida assassins, has a knack for survival. And he has at least one loyal friend left. Shortly after the electoral drubbing George Bush paused on a trip to Africa to pay warm tribute to him. He sounded less enthusiastic about Sharif's ascent. The message filtered quickly through the lines. In Washington the state department urged the opposition to work with Musharraf. In Islamabad American diplomats engaged in frantic talks with the opposition.

Senior officials from all parties told the Guardian they were trying to broker a deal that would ensure Musharraf stays in power. The PML (Q) official said his party was being pressured by US embassy officials hoping for a coalition between their party with Benazir Bhutto's Pakistan People's party, now led by her widower, Asif Ali Zardari.

"The Americans want a German-style grand coalition including the PPP," he said. "They want Musharraf to stick around, even if it's a diminished Musharraf." Clouds gather as 'sulky' Musharraf retreats to bunker: Despite US support, president is isolated in battle for power >>> By Declan Walsh in Islamabad

Mark Alexander (Paperback)
Mark Alexander (Hardback)

Piggy Banks? No More!
THE TIMES: Knorbert the piglet has been dropped as the mascot of Fortis Bank after it decided to stop giving piggy banks to children for fear of offending Muslims.

The decision has been viewed in the Netherlands as the ritual slaughter of a popular pig by political correctness. To some, it is the latest sign of uncertainty in Europe's most tolerant country about how far it should go to accommodate the sensitivities of minorities. It comes as the country is braced for a backlash against the plans of Geert Wilders, a right-wing politician, to release a critical film about the Koran.

Pigs are considered an unclean animal by Muslims and Jews, and Knorbert was culled after seven years as the Fortis mascot. A spokesman told the Dutch media that “Knorbert does not meet the requirements that the multicultural society imposes on us”.

The bank added that there had been “a number of reactions to the pig” and that a new gift and character were being developed that would be “fun for children of any persuasion”. Children who had received a Knorbert piggy bank for opening a EuroKids account will be given a junior encyclopaedia instead.

The bank, which is based in the Netherlands and Belgium, was keen to play down the influence of cultural concerns on its decision. Lilian Tackaert, a spokeswoman, said that Knorbert had reached the natural end of his product life cycle. “The piglet was indeed being given to children opening a savings account but we ran out of stock, although some branches still had some,” she said. “Now we are looking for something else.” Piggy banks are given the chop as bank tries to attract young Muslims >>> By David Charter, Europe Correspondent

Mark Alexander (Paperback)
Mark Alexander (Hardback)

Disney Characters and Adolf
Images courtesy of The Telegraph
THE TELEGRAPH: The director of a Norwegian museum claimed yesterday to have discovered cartoons drawn by Adolf Hitler during the Second World War.

William Hakvaag, the director of a war museum in northern Norway, said he found the drawings hidden in a painting signed "A. Hitler" that he bought at an auction in Germany.

He found coloured cartoons of the characters Bashful and Doc from the 1937 Disney film Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs, which were signed A.H., and an unsigned sketch of Pinocchio as he appeared in the 1940 Disney film.

Hitler tried to make a living as an artist before his rise to power. While there was no independent confirmation yesterday that the drawings were the work of the Nazi leader, Hitler is known to have owned a copy of Snow White, the classic animated adaptation of a German fairy tale, and to have viewed it in his private cinema.

Mr Hakvaag, who said he had performed tests on the paintings which suggested that they dated from 1940, said: "I am 100 per cent sure that these are drawings by Hitler. If one wanted to make a forgery, one would never hide it in the back of a picture, where it might never be discovered."

The initials on the sketches, and the signature on the painting, matched other copies of Hitler's handwriting, he claimed.
"Hitler had a copy of Snow White," he said. "He thought this was one of the best movies ever made." Did Adolf Hitler draw Disney characters? >>>

Mark Alexander (Paperback)
Mark Alexander (Hardback)

Hillary Clinton Versus Barack Hussein Obama in the Austin, Texas Debate
Part 1:


Part 2
Part 3
Part 4
Part 5
Part 6
Part 7
Part 8
Part 9
Part 10
Part 11
Mark Alexander (Paperback)
Mark Alexander (Hardback)

Government Wants personal Details of Every Passenger
THE GUARDIAN: Passengers travelling between EU countries or taking domestic flights would have to hand over a mass of personal information, including their mobile phone numbers and credit card details, as part of a new package of security measures being demanded by the British government. The data would be stored for 13 years and used to "profile" suspects.

Brussels officials are already considering controversial anti-terror plans that would collect up to 19 pieces of information on every air passenger entering or leaving the EU. Under a controversial agreement reached last summer with the US department of homeland security, the EU already supplies the same information [19 pieces] to Washington for all passengers flying between Europe and the US.

But Britain wants the system extended to sea and rail travel, to be applied to domestic flights and those between EU countries. According to a questionnaire circulated to all EU capitals by the European commission, the UK is the only country of 27 EU member states that wants the system used for "more general public policy purposes" besides fighting terrorism and organised crime.

The so-called passenger name record system, proposed by the commission and supported by most EU governments, has been denounced by civil libertarians and data protection officials as draconian and probably ineffective.

The scheme would work through national agencies collecting and processing the passenger data and then sharing it with other EU states. Britain also wants to be able to exchange the information with third parties outside the EU.

Officials in Brussels and in European capitals admit the proposed system represents a massive intrusion into European civil liberties, but insist it is a necessary part of a battery of new electronic surveillance measures being mooted in the interests of European security. These include proposals unveiled in Brussels last week for fingerprinting and collecting biometric information of all non-EU nationals entering or leaving the union. Government wants personal details of every traveler: Phone numbers and credit card data to be collected under expanded EU plan >>> By Ian Traynor

Mark Alexander (Paperback)
Mark Alexander (Hardback)

An Interview with Geert Wilders

Mark Alexander (Paperback)
Mark Alexander (Hardback)

Pat Condell: The Shari’ah Fiasco

Mark Alexander (Paperback)
Mark Alexander (Hardback)

Two Saudi Scholars Find Nothing Un-Islamic in Allowing Women to Drive
BBC: Two Saudi scholars have said there is nothing in Islamic law to prevent women from driving.

The senior religious figures said the issue depended on the context.

They say women would need to be protected from harassment and that steps would have to be taken to ensure there was no mingling of the sexes.

An opinion poll published by a leading English-language Saudi newspaper suggests that this is a view supported by most Saudi men and women.

The two scholars are Abdel-Mohsin al-Obaikan - one of Saudi Arabia's senior religious figures - and another well-known cleric, Mohsin Awaji.

Both say that, in principle, Islamic law does not prevent women driving.

Everything depends, they say, on the context.

There are road safety issues. Steps need to be taken to prevent harassment of women drivers. Saudi scholars back women drivers >>> By Roger Hardy

Mark Alexander (Paperback)
Mark Alexander (Hardback)

Control Order on Muslim Convert Quashed by the High Court
DAILY EXPRESS: A control order restricting the movements of a British convert to Islam has been quashed by the High Court.

MI5 alleged that restrictions were still necessary because of a "reasonable suspicion" that Cerie Bullivant planned to travel to Iraq or Afghanistan to engage in terrorist activity.



But Mr Justice Collins, sitting at London's High Court, quashed the order after ruling: "There is no reasonable suspicion that establishes that." Islam Convert Control Order Quashed >>>

Mark Alexander (Paperback)
Mark Alexander (Hardback)

Schwere Ausschreitungen und Plünderungen in Belgrad
Foto dank der Neuen Zürcher Zeitung
NEUE ZÜRCHER ZEITUNG Online: Nach der Grossdemonstration gegen die Unabhängigkeit Kosovos ist es in der serbischen Hauptstadt Belgrad zu schweren Ausschreitungen gekommen. Maskierte stürmten die amerikanische Botschaft und setzten ein Büro in Brand. In dem Gebäude wurde eine verkohlte Leiche gefunden.

(dpa) Nach dem Angriff von Randalierern auf die amerikanische Botschaft in Belgrad ist in dem Gebäude eine verkohlte Leiche gefunden worden. Das teilte die amerikanische Botschaft mit. Bei dem Toten handelt es sich laut den Angaben offenbar um einen der Randalierer, wie der Belgrader Fernsehsender Pink TV unter Berufung auf die Polizei berichtete. Eine Sprecherin der amerikanischen Botschaft sagte, vom Personal werde niemand vermisst.

Maskierte hatten am Donnerstagabend nach einer Massendemonstration von 150.000 Menschen gegen die Loslösung des Kosovos von Serbien die Botschaft gestürmt und ein Büro in Brand gesetzt. Der amerikanische Botschafter war zum Zeitpunkt des Angriffs nicht anwesend. Eine Elite-Einheit der Polizei fuhr mit Schützenpanzern vor, um die Menge zu zerstreuen. Der Brand in der Botschaft wurde von der Feuerwehr schnell gelöscht. Auch die Gebäude der Botschaften von Grossbritannien, Kroatien, Deutschland und der Türkei wurden angegriffen. Schwere Ausschreitungen und Plünderungen in Belgrad: Amerikanische Botschaft in Brand gesetzt - Fund einer Leiche im Gebäude >>>

Mark Alexander (Paperback)
Mark Alexander (Hardback)

Beveiled Muslims Test Tolerance in Secular Britain
Photo courtesy of the International Herald Tribune
Women covering themselves up is objectionable to many British people, and is seen as a sign of subjugation. British women, along with their sisters in other Western countries, fought long and hard for their liberation and equal rights. They view the veil, especially the full veil, as a step back in time, as a step back to a bygone age. Wearing it is also seen as a clear sign that Muslims do not wish to integrate.

INTERNATIONAL HERALD TRIBUNE - LONDON: Increasingly, Muslim women in Britain take their children to school and run errands covered head to toe in flowing black gowns that allow only a slit for their eyes.

Like little else, their appearance has unnerved Britons, testing the limits of tolerance in this stridently secular nation. Many veiled women say they are targets of abuse. At the same time, efforts are growing to place legal curbs on the full Muslim veil, known as the niqab.

The past year has seen numerous examples: A lawyer dressed in a niqab was told by an immigration judge that she could not represent a client because, he said, he could not hear her. A teacher wearing a niqab was told by a provincial school to go home. A student who was barred from wearing a niqab took her case to the courts, and lost. In fact, the British education authorities are proposing a ban on the niqab in schools altogether.

David Sexton, a columnist for The Evening Standard, wrote recently that Britain has been "too deferential" toward the veil. "I find such garb, in the context of a London street, first ridiculous and then directly offensive," he said.

Although the number of women wearing the niqab has increased in the past several years, only a tiny percentage of women among Britain's two million Muslims cover themselves completely. It is impossible to say how many exactly.

Some who wear the niqab, particularly younger women who have taken it up recently, concede that it is a frontal expression of Islamic identity, which they have embraced since Sept. 11, 2001, as a form of rebellion against the policies of the Blair government in Iraq and at home.

"For me it is not just a piece of clothing, it's an act of faith, it's solidarity," said a 24-year-old program scheduler at a broadcasting company in London, who would allow only her last name, Al Shaikh, to be printed, saying she wanted to protect her privacy. "9/11 was a wake-up call for young Muslims," she said. Head-to-toe Muslim veils test tolerance of secular Britain >>> By Jane Perlez

Mark Alexander (Paperback)
Mark Alexander (Hardback)

Defending the West
THE SPECTATOR – Melanie Phillips: Daniel Pipes records how a united display of public condemnation and opprobrium forced Islamist organisations in America to back down over the refusal by Muslim cab drivers to transport blind passengers accompanied by their guide dogs. Faced with a united approach by police, courts and public opinion which resulted in such cab-drivers admonished, fined, re-educated, warned, or even jailed, the Council on American Islamic Relations finally backed down. Pipes concludes:

When Westerners broadly agree on rejecting a specific Islamic law or tradition and unite against it, Western Islamists must adjust to the majority's will. Guide dogs for the blind represent just one of many such consensus issues; others tend to involve women, such as husbands beating wives, the burqa head coverings, female genital mutilation, and ‘honor’ killings. Western unity can also compel Islamists to denounce their preferred positions in areas such as slavery and Shar‘i-compliant finances.

Defending the West >>> By Melanie Phillips

Mark Alexander (Paperback)
Mark Alexander (Hardback)

Flemming Rose on Free Speech and Radical Islam
Mr. Rose is the culture editor of Jyllands-Posten. He is writing a book about the challenges to free speech in a globalized world.

THE WALL STREET JOURNAL - Opinion: At a lunch last year celebrating his 25th anniversary with Jyllands-Posten, Kurt Westergaard told an anecdote. During World War II Pablo Picasso met a German officer in southern France, and they got into a conversation. When the German officer figured out whom he was talking to he said:

"Oh, you are the one who created Guernica?" referring to the famous painting of the German bombing of a Basque town by that name in 1937.

Picasso paused for a second, and replied, "No, it wasn't me, it was you."

For the past three months Mr. Westergaard and his wife have been on the run. Mr. Westergaard did the most famous of the 12 Muhammad cartoons published in Jyllands-Posten in September 2005 -- the one depicting the prophet with a bomb in his turban. The cartoon was a satirical comment on the fact that some Muslims are committing terrorist acts in the name of Islam and the prophet. Tragically, Mr. Westergaard's fate has proven the point of his cartoon: In the early hours of Tuesday morning Danish police arrested three men who allegedly had been plotting to kill him.

In the past few days 17 Danish newspapers have published Mr. Westergaard's cartoon, which is as truthful as Picasso's painting. My colleagues at Jyllands-Posten and I understand that the cartoon may be offensive to some people, but sometimes the truth can be very offensive. As George Orwell put it in the suppressed preface to "Animal Farm": "If liberty means anything, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear."

Sadly, the plot to kill Mr. Westergaard is not an isolated story, but part of a broader trend that risks undermining free speech in Europe and around the world. Consider the following recent events: In Oslo a gallery has censored three small watercolor paintings, showing the head of the prophet Muhammad on a dog's body, by the Swedish artist Lars Vilks, who has been under police protection since the fall of 2007. In Holland the municipal museum in The Hague recently refused to show photos by the Iranian-born artist Sooreh Hera of gay men wearing the masks of the prophet Muhammad and his son Ali; Ms. Hera has received several death threats and is in hiding. In Belarus an editor has been sentenced to three years in a forced labor camp after republishing some of Jyllands-Posten's Muhammad cartoons. In Egypt bloggers are in jail after having "insulted Islam." In Afghanistan the 23-year-old Sayed Perwiz Kambakhsh has been sentenced to death because he distributed "blasphemous" material about the mistreatment of women in Islam. And in India the Bengal writer Taslima Nasreen is in a safe house after having been threatened by people who don't like her books. Every one of the above cases speaks to the same problem >>> By Flemming Rose

LETTERS TO THE WALL STREET JOURNAL APROPOS OF THIS ARTICLE:
Do You Have a Right to Avoid What You Don't Want to Hear?

Mark Alexander (Paperback)
Mark Alexander (Hardback)

Danish Cartoonist Kicked Out of Hotel Over Jihadist Fears, Now Homeless
HOT AIR: Two years ago Kurt Westergaard was in his Copenhagen home drawing pictures. One of them was of the Muslim prophet, Muhammad. Now Westergaard is homeless.

Draw a picture offensive to Muslim extremists, and you might find yourself without a roof. Ask Kurt Westergaard, one of the twelve Danish cartoonists whose autumn 2005 Muhammad caricatures lead to violent protests throughout the Muslim world. He was booted from his police-protected hotel room on Feb. 15 for being “too much of a security risk.” And now the 73-year-old cartoonist and his wife are without a place to live. Danish cartoonist kicked out of hotel over jihadist fears, now homeless >>> By Allahpundit

Mark Alexander (Paperback)
Mark Alexander (Hardback)

Islamic Fashion: The Great Cover-Up
Jakarta:


Turkey:


Iran:


Mark Alexander (Paperback)
Mark Alexander (Hardback)

Eat You Heart Out, Ahmadinejad! Naughtiness and Daring in Iran

Mark Alexander (Paperback)
Mark Alexander (Hardback)

’Hooks-R-Us’ Preacher of Hate Launches Yet Another Appeal Over US Extradition
DAILY EXPRESS: Islamist preacher Abu Hamza has lodged an appeal against his extradition to the United States.

A Home Office spokeswoman said that the appeal will now be considered by Home Secretary Jacqui Smith but could not say when a decision will be made.



Ms Smith signed papers paving the way for Hamza, 49, to face terror charges in the US on February 7.



There was a 14-day deadline, which was due to end on Wednesday, for Hamza's legal team to mount an appeal.



Hamza, who has served two years of a seven-year sentence for soliciting murder and inciting racial hatred, is wanted in the US to face charges that include providing support to al Qaida and involvement in a hostage-taking conspiracy.



The US government claims he was involved in a global conspiracy to wage jihad against the US and other western countries. Hamza Appeals Over US Extradition >>>

Mark Alexander (Paperback)
Mark Alexander (Hardback)

Diana, the Late Princess of Wales: “There’s Something About the Way You Look Tonight” - اميرة ويلز

Mark Alexander (Paperback)
Mark Alexander (Hardback)

Endless Love

Mark Alexander (Paperback)
Mark Alexander (Hardback)

Gays Cause Earthquakes, Says Ultra-Orthodox Jew
BBC: An Israeli MP has blamed parliament's tolerance of gays for earthquakes that have rocked the Holy Land recently.

Shlomo Benizri, of the ultra-Orthodox Jewish Shas Party, said the tremors had been caused by lawmaking that gave "legitimacy to sodomy".

Israel decriminalised homosexuality in 1988 and has since passed several laws recognising gay rights.

Two earthquakes shook the region last week and a further four struck in November and December. Israeli MP blames quakes on gays >>>

Mark Alexander (Paperback)
Mark Alexander (Hardback)

Mohamed Al Fayed, the Owner of Harrods, ‘Laying Into’ the British Establishment


Mark Alexander (Paperback)
Mark Alexander (Hardback)

The Muslim and the Christian Princess



Mark Alexander (Paperback)
Mark Alexander (Hardback)

An Arab Perspective on the Princess: اميرة ويلز

Mark Alexander (Paperback)
Mark Alexander (Hardback)

Why Are Americans Giving Up Their Freedom?
TOWNHALL.COM: Are Americans tiring of individual liberty?
It sure seems so. How else can you explain the proliferation of laws that regulate the most mundane aspects of our lives, and the mostly passive reaction of Americans to the ever increasing micromanagement of our lives?

Liberty has always been a tougher sell than many of us assume. We all want the freedom to do as we like, but few of us are as committed to allowing others to act contrary to our notion of right and wrong. Majorities have always sought and often found ways to impose their views upon minorities. The most vocal minorities have often been successful in imposing their will on the majority, at least for a time.

So there is nothing new about threats to Individual liberty being a daily part of our lives. What is new is that the institutional barriers to regulating our daily lives have effectively broken down. It took a Constitutional Amendment to pass prohibition of alcohol (and repeal it). Who today expects a Constitutional fight over smoking, obesity, trans-fats, or any of the myriad personal issues now under the purview of government control?

America was founded on the belief that government power should be strictly limited, because the alternative to limited power was unlimited power. The framers of the Constitution were rightly concerned that without strict institutional barriers to the expansion of government powers there would eventually be no barriers at all. Power, in any form, longs to be absolute.

Unfortunately, the concept of limited government is becoming an anachronism in today’s America.

There are no limits on what government can regulate because we have accepted the notion that there are no limits to the benefits government can and should bestow upon us. Fifty percent of health care is paid for by the government—including universal health care for all of us over 65. Your trans-fat laden donut today could mean higher taxes for me in the future. Ditto for smoking and other risky behavior. The pervasiveness of government power over our lives… >>> By David Strom

Mark Alexander (Paperback)
Mark Alexander (Hardback)