Monday, April 10, 2006

Is talk of limited nuclear strikes on Iran "nuts"?

Image hosting by Photobucket
JACK STRAW sought yesterday to silence renewed sabre-rattling from hardliners within the US Administration who are pressing for military action — even the use of tactical nuclear weapons — against Iran.

The Foreign Secretary described the idea that the White House wanted a nuclear strike as “completely nuts”. He insisted that Britain would not support pre-emptive military action, adding: “I’m as certain as I can be sitting here that neither would the United States.”

Many analysts in the West suspect that Tehran is attempting to build its own nuclear weapons. Over the weekend Iran allowed UN inspectors to examine some of the atomic plants which, its Government maintains, are designed solely for production of electricity.

Speaking to the BBC, Mr Straw said: “There is no smoking gun, there is no casus belli. We can’t be certain about Iran’s intentions and that is, therefore, not a basis on which anybody would gain authority to go for military action.” Read it all here: The idea of US nuclear attack on Iran is just nuts, says Straw Mark Alexander
Please accept my sincere apologies for my absence in recent days. There has been illness (with hospitalization) in the family, so I have been otherwise engaged. I am posting this today, but, unfortunately, I shall not be able to answer all the comments as I usually do. Please bear with me as things will hopefully return to normal again soon.

28 comments:

heather said...

Mark,
It's good to hear from you. Please don't worry about not posting. We all understand the need to be with your family at this time.

“President Bush says (military action) is not on the agenda, but they don’t rule out any option in theory. I believe it is not on the agenda and they are very committed indeed to resolving this issue by negotiation.”

Yeah, negoitiate with the nutcase that is hell bent on hastening the return of the 12th imam (Mahdi), good luck with that.

I consider myself an optimist, but this situation is so very depressing, and I don't see a solution.

I wonder if Chuck Colson was on to something when he posted this:

A New Year's dream: nightmare or prophecy?

Mussolini said...

“There is no smoking gun, there is no casus belli. We can’t be certain about Iran’s intentions..."

No cause for war that we can see?

You mean that promising to "wipe Israel off the map" is not enough?

You mean that being the largest funder of suicide bombers and other forms of terrorism where tens of thousands of innocents die every year is not enough?

So, there IS NO reason to ever go to war.

Might as well just give up now.

Always On Watch said...

Pardon me, but Jack Straw is an idiot. If he sees a mushroom cloud over Israel, what inane thing will he say then?

I happened to hear GWB speak on television this morning when he was addressing students at Johns Hopkins. He made it very clear that Iran must not be allowed to have nukes. Now, I'm not a diehard Bush fan these days, but he had that steely look in his eyes. I think he means what he says. I hope so.

As Heather has pointed out, there is no negotiating with a nutjob like Ahmadinejad, who has his eyes on the mahdi prize.

Always On Watch said...

OT here, and I don't think Mark will mind as he's occupied with family illness....

Tomorrow is supposedly the birthdate of MTP. I feel another "perverse" posting coming on. Very out-of-character for me, but I just have to take this opportunity.

forrestshalom said...

what's nuttier?

an islamic nuke attack on a western population center?

who's side is this straw guy on?

there is something deeply wrong with the west that in can elect such
leaders.

the west should wholeheartedly get behind israel and cut all ties with
moslem countries: economic, military,and political. it is committing suicide and God is not mocked. We absolutely need His help to roll back the islamic onslaught.

buy oil elsewhere, russia for example. and americans should dump their gas guzzling vehicles for hondas and toyotas. (i like the prius) 50 mpg.

forrestshalom said...

as for bush,

i wouldn't trust him.

he's in league with the saudi's up to the gills and there will be hell to pay for it for sure!

israel shouldn't believe a single word he says and neither should the american people or anyone else.

Always On Watch said...

Forrest Shalom,
I don't say that I trust GWB. And his ties to Saudi are disturbing in the extreme.

Of course, Saudi isn't too fond of Iraq. Very old conflict, going back to the Persian vs. Arab idea.

Xinyi said...

Hey there heather,
just want to thank you for posting that Chuck Cholsen link there. scared the hell out of me but I also recognize that its a very likely scenario. Yeah and neither do I see a solution either. Unless God intervenes.

Anum Mahktar said...

It is so funny how Americans is so afraid of Islam?
Most Muslims want only to live peacefully but when we are constantly attacked then of course we must fight.
Would you not do the same?

Iran Watch said...

I think McCain stated it best when he said the only thing worse than using our military to strike Iran was a nuclear Iran. Bush has clearly stated that he will not allow Iran to become a nuclear power.
And so has Israel.

usiconoclasticpatriot said...

Indeed, there are "nuts" about, namely Ahmadinejad and Jack Straw. Since when is is normal for the leader of a country to openly advocate ethnic cleansing and propagate hatred? I thought Tony Blair's government was against religious hatred, so why is this OK with Jack?

forrestshalom said...

we can rest assured that the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob will triumph in the end!

This is what the bible teaches and the chicken came before the egg.

--------

Psalm 2:12 Kiss the Son, lest he be angry, and ye perish from the way, when his wrath is kindled but a little. Blessed are all they that put their trust in him.

friendlysaviour said...

heather, I checked the link, thanks, truly mind-boggling.
Hey we all know that there is an enemy and that to defeat it, cut off it's head off. Without the "stone" to do ring a ring a roses with, what has islim got left?
An old book.
It would be that or abject ruin. The rest of us peasants will have to fight in the streets as we cuss people like Jack Straw whose names will be cussed for all eternity.
Don't Mo's mates know that if they mess up the country, they will all be in the same boat. I fear for those fools when the blinkers are rudely ripped from our eyes.
Straw is exactly that, a man of "straw." Expect nothing but dhim-witted inanity from him.
I hope our military will have a coup and depose this cowardly Government, when the sh.t hits the fan.

George Mason said...

Mark,

Welcome back. Obviously these are tough times, but you have so much support, as you can read.

He is so well named, this Jack Straw. Every time I see something he has uttered and then think of his name, I think of that expression "straw man." It refers to creating a phony something and attacking that phony something as though it was the real thing. He is sort of a substitute scarecrow, a place-holder waiting for that competent someone to arrive.

Jack Straw also reminds me of the sound track to a post-WWII Italian film. The music bore no relation to the story; it just chugged along as though it and not the film was the only thing there. Jack talks out-of-synch on good days and divorced from the drama he is supposed to be managing on all the rest of the days.

I swear, I think your politicos and ours exchange places with each other, as actors with fancy makeup and good voice and accent control.

Speaking of Brits, do you suppose Jack Straw ever heard of Neville Chamberlain?

George Mason said...

To Anum: Are you trying to emulate Jack Straw?

MissingLink said...

Jack Straw has always been a liability.
Another useful idiot.

Mussolini said...

Anus Mahktar:

Your post sent me into gales of laughter. I think I pissed my pants.

Try here for your "peaceful" religion that only chops off babies heads when they're "attacked."

You won't find any sites like that for christians, or jews, or hindus, or bhuddists...

Only Islam. Peace and Islam are not mutally compatible terms. Islam is all about murder.

Afraid of you? A F R A I D ?

Are you smoking your bhurka over there? Got beat in the head one too many times by your peaceful husband?

Or were you born a few fuses short of a full suicide bomb belt?

No one here is afraid of you. We are afraid of our GOVERNMENTS who appear to be allowing you to do whatever the hell you want.

I got bacon here that I will have no fear smearing all over your "holy" book, nor you, nor your silly "jihad" fools.

Islam is a STUPID man's religion.

heather said...

Very well stated Mussolini.

heather said...

Anum.

When I first read your post I thought you had to be kidding.

What in the world makes you think that Americans are afraid of Islam? We hold the utmost contempt for it based on what it has done to the world. It is nothing more than a cult of hatred.

Your statement about the desire of most Muslims to "live peacefully" was really hilarious. And the statement about constantly being attacked was priceless.

Where were you on 9/11? Practicing your religion of peace by jumping up and down celebrating the slaughter of thousands of innocent people?

BTW-I noticed one of your listed interests was submission. Click on the link to see what type of people have similar interests.

heather said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
heather said...

Anum,

This is what Islam
does.


Remember Beslan? What kind of religion does that?

Always On Watch said...

George Mason makes the point I always think of when I hear the name "Jack Straw": straw man.

I also think of the scarecrow in The Wizard of Oz: "If I only had a brain."

Always On Watch said...

I see that Anum has trolled over here as well. Yesterday, it was American Crusader and IBA. The day before, it was Warren.

And last week, my site, where I was declared a blasphemer. I wear the label proudly. After all, Anum declared that Jesus and his disciples reverted to Islam. So, I spoke my faith.

I won't bother linking to the specific articles; one can spot that Pakistani flag as avatar--not terribly original, I must say.

Anum appears to be blogging from a U.S. government computer--or so I've heard. Also, Anum seems to be hitting various sites which I frequent. It's gonna backfire, though. Hehehe.

Always On Watch said...

Mussolini,
Bravo!

Always On Watch said...

Anum allowed herself/himself/itself/themselves to be interviewed by a Jew here.

Beak is a good friend of mine, and his site is safe.

Have a read--interview Q&A and comments. Avenging Apostate also stopped by in the comments section.

heather said...

AOW,
Anum appears to be blogging from a U.S. government computer--or so I've heard. Also, Anum seems to be hitting various sites which I frequent. It's gonna backfire, though. Hehehe.

You should show her/him/it this article:

The Muslims are the Ones Who Failed to Present a Positive Image of Islam

heather said...

xinyi,

You're so welcome. You know, I read a more alarming article by him a few months ago, but I can't find it.

Chuck Colson isn't given to making wild predictions. He's a Christian and runs a prison ministry. (I think he became a Christian while in prison for
his involvement in the Watergate scandal.)

I believe the Bible shows that God does intervene--it's only a matter of time.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
bld,
I thought it was mind-boggling too--if I find the other article I will post a link.

Always On Watch said...

Heather,
That's a great link! Thank you.

I don't see Muslims doing much of the necessary separating, however.